Anonymous 05/03/26(Sun)19:45:49 No. 108748052 >>108744608 Consistently coming up with things nobody has isn't necessary, and is near impossible. But there's a difference between looking like settling on one specific thing and variations are possibly just model RNG or looser prompting, and not looking like that. I suppose it may be possible to cheat and pull a for x in pseudointellectual_topics: monologue about x , but multiple is still more than 1.>>108744538 >>108744552 Same color scheme, else different. >>108738922 >>108738938 Same composition, else different. >>108744977 >>108744991 Certain 20th century styles and people idk. All might as well been pulled from a pile of prompts or style references, but in a vacuum I can only assume someone made some changes here and there, unless it turns out they were fully automated. Also more easily ignored when they aren't trying to be edgy or provocative. If chingrab and leotard anon were unironic then they found it peak sexy in ther minds, within nsfw limits of closed models. Picrel, left column, slice of life, not too interesting, features same setting and character, but depicts three distinct acts and points in time, and doesn't require dream-like changes for "variety". Not saying I'd start posting 20 pics of the bathroom. Meanwhile, "samey things" have a stronger "same thing but regenned?" effect, with little adjustments that don't change the idea. I remember anon posting TFD webms, IIRC at least 1 (lol) would have the character break into laughter at the end, which shows she doesn't poker face the whole time. Can be gimmicky if you think about it, muh humanity... Anyway, right column pics 2 and 3 poses the group the same way, looking at viewer, context unchanging, feels comically "staged". If the same guy is about to be mexican beheaded so many times, I'd start wondering if anything ever happens to him, "Does he actually get his pic taken this way and nothing else?" Stuck in a snapshot, with changes as a result of a non-strict prompt being regenned.