>OG programmers get started on machine code>languages like C come into exstence>the C programmers get looked down on for not having to bootstrap their own compilers to be able to do anything>OGs die>C and other compiled languages take over. Virtually all programming uses C even at low level>scripting languages come out>they're seen more as toys, and not really considered programming>scripting languages become more powerful to the point they can entirely replace compiled code for most applications>C boomers screech that people coding in scripting languages aren't real programmers>life continues on>AI happens, its seen as a toy, and not for serious programming>AI gets more powerful>programmers screech that coding with AI isn't real programmingAnd then what happens? History repeats.
>>108743532>And then what happens?Look around you. And remember, it's only going to get worse.
this comparison stops at """AI""" because it requires prior code to source from because it can't actually coherently program on its own. So it will never actually kill traditional programming.(Now if actual AGI ever goes public, sure)
>>108743980Ron Paul? You've been here a long time.
>>108743532>OGs dieNot the GOAT
>>108743532Ai won
>>108743532>compares llms to deterministic compilers unironicallyyou're exactly the target audience for this rug-pull, anon.
Call me back when those technologies are actually become obsolete. I bet there will be decades between LLMs dying (first) and Forth, Lisp, and C dying.
>>108743532this timeline is so wrong its astonishing
