What do you think about "technology bad" movies?
technology is bad
>>108750087
>>108750078obvious cope made by "boomer" plebs who buy into the "old=good, new=bad" fallacy. I remember when there were episodes of cringe cartoons I watched as a kid with the same cliche storyline and the moral being "technology bad and haz no-soulz, use imagination and luv"Yet somehow that particular movie you posted uses CGI and that God-awful "cal-arts"/bean-mouth style. Pretty ironic.
>>108751525>"old=good, new=bad" fallacyIt's not a fallacy though, at least not entirely. Old technology was designed and made locally, and the average human could understand how it worked. Modern technology is a magic black box of proprietary materials, manufacturing methods and code made in a chinese factory and impossible to repair.
>>108750087this
>>108751651agreed, but what I was referring to was about those boomers that are extreme luddites who unironically think ALL digital tech is bad and "brain-rots-da-youf" , even something as innocent as a coin-op arcade vidya or a dumbphone. I grew up with them and they were insufferable.
>>108751525>obvious cope made by "boomer" plebs who buy into the "old=good, new=bad" fallacy.>>108751651>It's not a fallacy though, at least not entirely.Yeah it's not. And boomers will only talk about some superficial shit like how people are too much on their phones these days or that the music was better.Point out to the boomer that he worked a factory job after HS and supported a wife (That wasn't both a feminist harpie and wanting you to pay for everything at the same time) and kids on that, bought a nice house, brand new car AND had money for gas to joyride... And the boomer will revert to his programming and talk about bootstraps.
>>108750078Why does the person in the passenger seat have brown skin?
>>108750087FPBP
>>108750078The dad in that movie acted at though he was a boomer when he would actually have been an early millennial given his age and the time period.
