I have a 1440p@500hz QD-OLED.What would be an upgrade?
>>108765815Apple Studio Display XDR
>>108765815>What would be an upgrade?4k 240hz WOLEDbut as someone who has been on 4k for the last 12 months, im honestly not a big fan.the performance hit is too strong compared to 1440p and 1440p is still plenty in terms of resolution.
depends on the size of the display. but 1440p is fine for computer monitors in almost any case. get another one if you want to upgrade and you do actual work on your system.
waiting until 4k ultrawides at 500hzfor me that would be the ultimate monitor
>>108765841>500hzwhats the obsession with 500hz?you're not getting that many frames anyway
>>108765846plus OP is likely using DSC which adds latency and compression but retards are like "I dont notice it!" just like they dont notice their PCL through the roof or their DPC latency.
>>108765846Perfectly possible in a post-framegen world.
>>108765815Why do you think you need an upgrade?
>>108765884fastest gaming cpu in the world gets 160fps average at 1440p across multiple games. 2x framegen is only 320fps.
>>108765884and perfectly unreasonable.the only games that would give you such a high framerate are competitive shooters and relying on generated frames in those titles is absolute madness.
>>108765815A CRT
>>108765815When I first saw this in the catalog I thought they were finally doing an adult crayon shin Chan
>>108765846why not? that's about as much as you're ever going to want going forward>>108765876i also have a 500hz monitor and mine has displayport 2.1 so it's not compressing anything
>>108766078>why not?you're artifically limiting which monitors to buy without getting any real benefit from it.240hz is plenty. even 180hz will do just fine.
>>108766103limiting how? the only way to go up from a 1440p 500hz oled is resolutionyou're not getting better motion clarity or picture quality anywhere else
>>108766039crt clarity is a complete memejust because it's more efficient at serving you 60 images doesn't mean you see more than 60 images
The display industrys (lg/samsung/chinks) inability to make >240hz 4k oled displays is fucking baffling
>>108766153>inabilitythe displayport spec is holding them back right nowit's literally not worth making those only to saddle those turbo expensive monitors that would have to be sold at $1500 with fucking compression
>>108766179>the displayport specwith dsc 2.1 can do like 700hz at 4k
>>108766189yes, the C in dsC stands for compressionthey're not making those uber expensive monitors only to compress shit
>>108766200what the fuck, every monitor has it on by defaultthey only used more modern port on 4k 240hz displays because the old port couldnt hack it with dsc
>>108766125In purely linear motion, a 60hz CRT is indistinguishable from a 1000hz CRT. It looks the exact same to you. It just has no blur from the get-go (the frame exists only for a fraction of a millisecond - your eye can't move fast enough for the picture to blur).On sample&hold monitors (LCDs, OLEDs) the amount of motion blur is directly correlated with refresh rate.
>>108766215and in practice an oled and a crt at 120hz would look the same tooyou don't see persistence, you see frames, a crt is not giving you extra information
>>108766247>and in practice an oled and a crt at 120hz would look the same tooNo they absolutely do not. If I scroll a web page on my phone's 120hz OLED, I can't read the text. It becomes blurry. This is not something that happens even on a 60hz CRT. The text remains at a crystal-clear readable clarity no matter how fast I scroll. >a crt is not giving you extra informationNo, but it lets you actually see the information that's there.
>>108766206displayport only got good enough to losslessly display 1440p 500hz last yearit'll be a while for 4k to display 500hz, that's more than 2x the bandwidth
>>108766259>his point of reference is a fucking phonelmaoyou do know that the blurring that comes from having more visual information at higher refresh rates actually makes text worse right?you don't get high refresh rates to read fucking text
>>108766290>his point of reference is a fucking phoneNot an argument. Explain how would that affect anything? You wont be able to. >you don't get high refresh rates to read fucking textNot an argument. If you're unable to understand the concept of a benchmark, I have no idea why should I bother talking to you. >you do know that the blurring that comes from having more visual information at higher refresh rates actually makes text worse right?Absolutely not true. Why does the text still remain perfectly clear when I set my CRT to 200hz? That's more raw "information" than on the OLED.Go read this https://blurbusters.com/faq/oled-motion-blur/
don't get a 4K monitor it will ruin lower resolutions for you, comparison is the thief of joy. wait for newer monitor tech. I went back to 1440p when my nephew broke my monitor and it just looks terrible. Also the resolution scaling on Windows is awful, some programs just don't scale properly at all but on Linux it works perfectly
>>108766308>Not an argument. Explain how would that affect anything? You wont be able to.phone screens focus on efficiency, not fidelity, they consume a fraction of power that your big crt shitbox doesyou have no proper frame of reference here>Not an argument. If you're unable to understand the concept of a benchmarkif you think reading text is a benchmark then you're a lost cause>Absolutely not true. Why does the text still remain perfectly clear when I set my CRT to 200hz? because you're running it at 400p to reach that so the text is so fucking big that it's hard to miss
>>108766341>phone screens focus on efficiency, not fidelity, You're just making shit up. An OLED is an OLED, just because it's on a phone doesn't magically make it perform like an LCD. This was Samsung's flagship a few years ago too, it has the best OLED panel the industry produced at the time. HDR10+, 1500 nits peak .. It's arguably still higher fidelity than what you can reasonably buy for desktop. Phone OLEDs were always far ahead of desktop/tv tech. >if you think reading text is a benchmark then you're a lost causeWhat the fuck is the goalpost then, if being able to see things clearly isn't it? Like seriously???>because you're running it at 400p to reach that so the text is so fucking big that it's hard to missI can just scale the text to be the same relative size on the OLED or use more closely match resolutions or anything else. But I don't see the point. "More information" making things "more blurry" is the most retarded thing I've read on this board in a long while, and is disproven by pictures sent to this thread (>>108766215). Or just set your 120hz monitor to 60hz and see for yourself. You're clearly not interested in actually arguing anything in good faith considering how much uncorroborated bullshit you just hallucinating, so this shall be your last (You).
>>108766341I have an oled monitor and I can confirm what he is saying you dumb zoomer
>>108766407>You're just making shit up. An OLED is an OLEDyeah ok, you're just being a retard on purpose herejust go ask an ai chatbot why>if being able to see things clearly isn't it? Like seriously???it's for fucking video games where you're not looking at minute detail like text where you benefit more from more frames that portray your mouse movement better>But I don't see the point. "More information" making things "more blurry" is the most retarded thingok retard, imagine cycling between 2 images that last for 500ms and then 200 images that last for 5ms eachwhich one is easier to make out?
>just go ask an ai chatbot why>just go ask an ai chatbot why>just go ask an ai chatbot why>just go ask an ai chatbot why>just go ask an ai chatbot why>just go ask an ai chatbot why
>>108766459yes, if you're so retarded that you don't understand the difference in design and functionality priorities between a mobile screen and an actual fucking monitor then you're so stupid that you need an ai chatbot to lecture you
>>108766340Well it's over for you then, there will be a 6k monitor coming out.https://tftcentral.co.uk/news/samsung-odyssey-g80hs-the-worlds-first-6k-gaming-monitor-officially-arrives-with-32-165-330hz-dual-mode-panel
>>108766470just let it go bro.this is a retard thread.
>>1087658151680x1050 75Hz
>>108766645>have to sit 30cm away from the fucking screenthis is awfulit should be at least 40 inches
>>108768436That makes no sense, you want to be closer to a higher DPI display.
>>108770122you want to hit 60 ppd30cm view distance is way too close, if you can't up a roman salute without touching the monitor it's way too close and unhealthy
>>108765815>What would be an upgrade?IPS
