[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>buy a 55 inch TV for the living room
>connect my HDMI Laptop to stream some animes
>had to do something else for a while
>leave a frame on on pause
>return after an hour
>resume
>frame burned on the panel
>$1999 stolen
>absolutely no red warnings on the box DO NOT LEAVE STILL FRAMES ON TV FOR LONG
Why isn't this common knowledge or warning at media/device/electronics stores?
What do I do now? turn it off and let the panel cool down for a bit? are the liquid crystals stuck?
>>
>>108773807
screenshot the frame and invert colors. leave it on for an hour.
>>
>>108773807
>Why isn't this common knowledge or warning at media/device/electronics stores?
Because they want it destroyed and pilpul it into being your fault so they can sell you another one. We used to have screensavers, remember? Saving is antisemitism, you must consoom.
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (148 KB, 1280x720)
148 KB JPG
>>108773826
I can't screenshot it. It's on the panel. It doesn't translate on the jpegs.
>>108773833
>use computers since '91
>realize today why we had moving screensavers
>I thought it was only to save energy
>>
cap
>>
OP here. It seems The more I playback the anime the more faint the stuck frame becomes.
I also enabled the Windows screensaver. I use Ribbons. It's a bit shit, but all are shit.
I want my first one from Windows 95, the Windows Doom game.
>>
File: adi6ymbrho881.gif (1.77 MB, 327x251)
1.77 MB GIF
>>108774013
>>
>>108774169
>feels fuzzy inside
Thanx doge.
>>
>>108773807
OP, I kind of don't believe your story. I've owned an OLED TV, the LG CX to be exact, for a long time, it's a 2020 model. I use it almost every day, and I have no burn-in. I've even disabled two features that exist to protect the panel (pixel shift, and the feature that automatically dims logos it detects). Even with both those features turn off, it still looks fantastic.

I vary what's on the screen, but I'll still play video games with static HUD elements for a long time. I also watch everything in Filmmaker mode, so brightness is never too high, except in the specular highlights in HDR content. Also, my TV goes into screensaver mode if I ever have a static image on there for a couple minutes.
>>
>>108774274
It went away after 20mins of watching my series. Is it bad to use a lot of backlight? I think it's on max. I like how vibrant it makes anime and movies.
>>
>>108774287
The brightness comes from pumping voltage through to the pixels. More brightness = more heat. Heat is what degrades the pixels and causes burn-in. That's why people recommend OLED screens for dark rooms especially. That's where you really appreciate the infinite contrast anyway.
>>
Also OP, if your TV has something like this in the settings, run this.
>>
Been using oled tv as my mobitor for 4 years, no burn in yet. Just don't raise panel brightness.
I never got why peak brightness was selling point when it just burns your eyes.
>>
>>108774395
For a purist who cares about image quality, a high brightness is great for HDR content because it can more accurately display those ultra bright parts of the image. But the true point of "high dynamic range" is the dynamic part. The difference between the super bright and super dark parts of an image. That's what makes OLEDs special. Watching a movie in a dark room on an OLED screen that's properly calibrated is unbeatable.
>>
>>108773866
>realize today why we had moving screensavers
>I thought it was only to save energy
Mein nigger, I got an audible KEK! I'm glad I could be of help.
>>
anime looks terrible on oleds
>>
>>108775159
If in windows, disable HDR.
>>
>>108774274

Also a LG CX user. I wish the remote could control screen brightness and the screen itself with buttons. Have you found a 3rd party solution that allows for that?
>>
>>108773807
still using daily LG OLED65C8 from 2018. Zero burns.
KYS stupid nig/g/er. Another nonsense thread.
IPS-CUKCS will never be real panels.
You can name it as you want to trick stupid niggers like OP (miniLED, QLED, etc.).

OLED the KING. period.
>>
>>108776468
I just always watch in a dark room so I never adjust the brightness. I have all my settings as close to reference as I can.
>>
>>108773826
>just burn in the other sub-pixels too bro that will fix it
lmao just burn the whole tv
>>
>He fell for the OLED meme
I don't feel sorry for you
>>
>>108774324
>That's why people recommend OLED screens for dark rooms especially.
in that case, I really ought to wonder why some people shill oled smartphones so much... are they fucking shut-ins who never use a phone outside in direct sunlight?
>>
>>108777118
yeah as annoying as image retention was on old LCDs they weren't permanent unlike OLED burn-in
>>
>>108773807
>are the liquid crystals stuck
OLEDs don't use liquid crystals. LCDs do.
It's most likely not actually burn in, but temporary image retention - something that can affect both OLEDs and LCDs. It should go away on its own after a while.

I have an LG C2 with 20k hours on it that has spent its entire life as a second monitor, primarily for youtube and content consumption (games, shows), and it still has only the faintest hint of burn in if Iook carefully at a solid gray image (mainly at the edge of the youtube video window). I've turned off the TV's own auto-dimming burn-in mitigation via the service remote, but I use a black background with no icons and have implemented my own dimming scripts for the browser I use on that monitor that allow for more fine-tuned control over which parts are dimmed. I knew what I was getting into when I bought it, so I don't mind the compromises. The perfect blacks and per-pixel light control are worth it to me for media consumption.
>>
>>108777559
People use phones differently than they use TVs. You're not usually going to have a static logo displayed on your phone for hours at a time. Also, people replace their phones more often than they replace TVs.
>>
File: image.png (55 KB, 151x300)
55 KB PNG
>>108778712
>You're not usually going to have a static logo displayed on your phone for hours at a time



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.