you can't tell me crt is the only thing it's been decades
you want a competent bfi implementation on modern oled, but those are limited by burn inpulsar monitors exist if you dont mind ips gray blacks
>>108775147Manufactures could do something about it, but they don't want to. Its probably possible to create an OLED panel that almost perfectly replicates the CRT impulse. But it would be dim, and for some reason normies like their monitors eye searing.
>>1087751471000Hz refresh rates
>>108775147It's already been solved.But manufacturers are like retarded childre, they're slow ar catchinging up.Blurbusters provided an algorithm that can replicate the crt beam, and works best the higher the refresh rate.At native 480Hz+ panels you should be able to achieve both clarity and brightness at a wide variety of frame rates.Nvidia even implemented its own spin as GSYNC PULSAR, but it's not very widespread yet Smooth motion and high refresh panels can also help.Going forward these two approaches will be the wayIf I were a manufacturer, I'd make 16:10 LCD and OLED monitors that can emulate CRT beams and mask slots NATIVELY, at any Hertz and compatible with VRR, and that would be the ultimate monitor for all use cases.But their mental minority is too challenged to even keep thesame gamma between all the possible Hertz for even reach thos very accesible heights that anyone like a brain, like me, could achieve with just some effort.
>>108775173>if you dont mind ips gray blacksIf you don't mind CRTs either, then
>>108777562Nobody is retarded except you. Nobody in the industry will push this hard for a product with such low demand. 480+ hz is only for few sweaty gaymers. Otherwise absolute 0 content for such screen. We will have 8k before that.
>>108778202Zero content, except 90% OF MOVIES IN THE UNIVERSE, gaymers, old consoles.And when they target gaymers, their dick is so limp it falls down so hard it makes a crater on the ground and collapses the whole earth into a fucking black hole.HELLO?!?!?!?WAKE UP ANON!!!!11!i hope i'm being aggravating enough that you won't think of anything else the whole day. I learned from the bests.
>>108778288Take meds. Every movie is in 24 fps. Literaly like 5 of them are in HFR. One is last avatar and that is only in 3D scenes and 2D with wide shots to avoid jitter. All the rest will look the same regarding 120 or 960 hz. Besides even sport is streamed in shit 50 fps. It would be a miracle if we ever get proper 120 fps.
>>108775147>>108777084my qd oled alienware is less blurry than my friends fw900, crtniggers need to know their place
>>108778288>90% OF MOVIES IN THE UNIVERSEThose look like shit on CRTs too. Perfect CRT motion quality requires frame rate equal to refresh rate.
>>108778567Yes, less blurry, until anything moves.
>>108778648oled at 240hz is really, really clean. the issue is being able to run games at those kinda fps, which is why you need nvidia multi frame gen
>>108778684What this modern trash needs to replicate a fraction of the power of the CRT. I will keep my 60fps real frames over hallucinated slop.
>>108778719well it is also 32"it has 8million pixelsit has perfect contrastits thindoesnt have crt light beams hitting your eyes
>>108778727> 8million pixelsCRT does not need all these pixels. 800x600 is more than enough. Plus it renders faster. No need for upscaling slop.
>>108775147That crt rolling scan shader does amazing things for motion clarity.
>>108778648its also clearer during motion, the sony looks like shit with or without motionim sorry to break it to you, but your stance on crt "superiority" is delusional
>>108775147you can, but you need to emulate CRT strobing.
>>108779411You probably have some form of brain cancer.
>>108777562our society is decaying desu. the same people putting it all together are detached, distinct and paid peanuts. that's the real problem.
sample and hold also gives you some really visually nauseating "motion blur" when spinning a camera around in game really fast. it looks awful and the shader fake motion blur is mediocre.
>>108779417>You probably have some form of brain cancer.oh noes! did somebaby's feefees get hurt???does the baby really attach his emotional wellbeing to being a massive luddite just for the sake of it??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>108777084>Like===drawn to it like a bug zapperHuh. The more you know.
>>108775147>you can't tell me crt is the only thing it's been decades>>108777084>Manufactures could do something about it, but they don't want to. Its probably possible to create an OLED panel that almost perfectly replicates the CRT impulse. But it would be dim, and for some reason normies like their monitors eye searing.>>108778648>Yes, less blurry, until anything moves.>>108778719>What this modern trash needs to replicate a fraction of the power of the CRT. I will keep my 60fps real frames over hallucinated slop.>>108778762> 8million pixels>CRT does not need all these pixels. 800x600 is more than enough. Plus it renders faster. No need for upscaling slop.>108779417>You probably have some form of brain cancer.
>people still give the time of day to a blog run by a guy who explicitly configured his camera for a CRT monitor and uses those settings to photograph every other monitor type
>>108775147We're just now getting to emulate what CRT's were doing with G-Sync Pulsar. However many decades to finally meet an equilibrium between LED's and CRT's.>>108779456>picconsent accident moment
>oledcucks still have no argument>to compensate they post xhemselfs as a hecking gigachaderinosgeg, crt wonned
>>108780551Is this your last cope?
crts are obsolete
>>108775173Every monitor has perfect blacks. Just turn it off faggot. OLED cultists are insufferable.
>>108782734are these just shitpost bots at this point
>>108778630NTSC TVs run movies with 3:2 pulldown and interlaced to hit 59.94Hz exactly, which combined with the phosphor afterglow of 15KHz CRTs will look pretty good.Alternatively 31KHz CRTs (aka computer monitors) can run in a refresh rate that is an exact integer multiple of movie frame rate (for ex. 71.928Hz).
>>108782749>everyone who didn't like oled is a shillbotyou're in a cult
Nobody here even knows crt's.
>>108782867The only thing nobody knows is whatever the hell this graph you keep posting is.
>>108783130I can't even tell you how much time I spent to make it. This was a rabbit hole and it burned me out. Likely nobody else is as informed as me.>nobody knows is whatever the hell this graph you keep posting isCRT and OLED were on opposite ends of each extreme with TN and IPS being the most stable. But they all converge around the middle half a minute in.
the problem of led and lcd is the decay time. CRTs have a constant decay effect; when the next frame is draw, the previous frame is already gone or almost gone, whatever the color or brightness. With leds, when a new frame is being drawn, the previous frame is still there more or less depending of the color and brightness. because of that, you have a ghosting effect and the brain can't do the interpolation as effectively as with crts. For leds to compete with crt smoothness, you will have to: draw a frame. draw _instantly_ a black screen. and only then draw the next frame and repeat. You have to draw two frames for each actual frames.
>>108783253wrong
>>108775147>the only thing CRTs can do better than other display technologies just so happens to be the only one that mattersHow convenient!
>>108783269wrong what? your picture is not even real.
>>108780836this is your first arrest
>>108783412crt is clearly blurring more in that pic stfu
why are displays so bad at motion blur
>>108775147Eh, 60hz is fine.
>>108784200because
>>108783179>TN and IPS being the most stableDo you know how VA compares?
>>108775147Clearly there is, just keep increasing refresh rate. Of course, it's going to get difficult to run anything at that refresh rate beyond desktop UIs. Maybe shit like frame generation with ridiculous multipliers is going to be more useful at extremely high refresh rates? Take your real 100 FPS and make it into fake 1000 FPS for the purpose of avoiding motion blur on the screen.Beyond that there are backlight strobing techniques which improve motion quality on the screen, like Pulsar or whatever that new thing that recently released was called.
>>108778567You've never actually seen an fw900
>>108783253>the problem of led and lcd is the decay timeTraditional LCD and OLED screens have no decay time at all. The image is permanently on, all the time, it does not decay at all, it only changes according to the input signal. Yes, this does cause motion blur compared to flickering displays like CRTs.>draw _instantly_ a black screenCRTs aren't "instant" either, like I can see trails behind bright objects on a black background on the CRT monitor I have, but it has to be quite fast.
