lmfao america can't stop taking Ls

>Western
American you mean. And looks to be so.

>>108776660
This is a death knell for the Chinese. AI is the future and by forcing businesses to continue wasting money on humans when they could get 100-1000x the productivity if that money was spent on AI means China will lose to the US.

>>108776711
Good morning!

>>108776717
Good morning sir how are you and your sirs doing today?

>>108776660
You think people are going to sit around and starve to death? Nah, starving, desperate people don't sit around, they will steal, plunder, and murder to not starve. I keep seeing this trope were people somehow believe the masses going hungry means nothing is going to happen. It's going to get bad.

>>108776809
If by bad you mean the masses will slaughter each other and leave the remaining 5% of the population the world then yes.

>>108776821
We've already seen this play out in history. If the mob reaches a certain size and organization, they will target the wealthy, steal everything they can get, then burn down what remains.

China is smart enough to act to prevent this scenario from happening. The wealthy here are exist in a bubble so they're oblivious to it. Hell, China will literally execute CEOs in China for doing things that are corrupt.

>>108776696
>>108776674
europe is just the poor retarded cousin of America

>>108776711
>100-1000x the productivity
Even if you were not a bot and such pRoDuCtiViTy was a thing, for what do you need that? I'm already pissed every freaking business tries to shove me their app. I don't need another fucking 1000 of them.

>>108776660
>justify layoffs
The only reason china is rich today is because they allowed their citizens to be treated like slaves with no rights. How quickly they forget.

>>108776711
Lose what? Americans will get turned into biodiesel but few child-eating pedophiles will have plot of land that defeated China? Also you do realise that you need consumers for economy, right?

>>108777012
That’s not really the main reason. Every poor nation treats their people as slaves, that’s just what comes naturally with being poor. But India or Indonesia or whatever country in Africa is not a superpower even coming close to China. They just made system where government has more control over the economy and then made small bubbles of high competition. And also they routinely disappear traitors to their nation from their party. And also they try to fuck over every western company that works with them while sweetening the deals.

>>108776660
>AI is safer
That was easy

>>108776660
AKA fire them with some other petty reasons instead so the cattles won't cause an uprising

>>108776711
>China will lose to the US.
At what?

>>108776660
China has 2x the unemployment rate of the US and growing. They're not going to actually enforce this. And those are just their own figures. The reality is probably much worse.

>>108776711
Anon the US already lost. You're living on an artificial economy propped up by Boomer savings.

>>108776865
That you think the elites won't have robot armies at their behest to deal with the cattle says everything wrong about your society. You can't sit down and seriously think about what's about to happen, you are waiting for your echo chamber to lull you into a comfortable talking point. Open your eyes and look at what musk is building with Optimus.

>>108776882
More likely to protect it's people and give them more rights though.

>>108776711
I am generation jillions of productivity by generating lewd swimsuits to coom to

take that luddites

>>108777029
Have you checked stocks recently? We are in a post consumer world. Line just goes up. That's how it is. Line goes up forever. Everybody poor? Line still go up.

>>108777291
Stocks and other financial bullshit is not real money, it’s made up, not in the sense that fiat currency is made up but in the way that the numbers don’t reflect reality at all, it’s all just speculation that will inevitably pop. If you tried to convert this fake money into liquidity or real money it will crash the stock and show that it’s nothing there, just an illusion where those who bought low and sold high legally stole money from those that bought high and sold low. When you remove the consumer suddenly 90% of companies lose revenue, losing revenue causes bunch of stocks to collapse, collapsing stocks cause mass selloff and mass selloff spills into other markets that weren’t affected otherwise. Elon Musk is nowhere near being the richest man, rather instead the way his company values are estimated are broken.

>>108776660
I already made this thread days ago.

File: And then for no reason at(...).png (26 KB, 600x300)

26 KB PNG

>>108777254
Which "people"?

>>108777326
Made-up or not, it is still their reality. Even if all of it is just everybody agreeing to never call out each other's lies, that's reality because that's the reality that determines your reality.
> it’s all just speculation that will inevitably pop.
That would be true if we lived in a consumer world but we don't, the Hormuz thing should have taught everyone that we are far into the post-consumer landscape where literally nothing in the real world matters. What matters is that line goes up, end of story. War, disease, famine, massive shutdowns and outages, we've had all of that within the last two months and line still goes up, line will never stop going up. To stop going up, everyone would have to agree that their money and finances are fake, and that's not happening. It's mask-off fraud from here until forever.

>>108776660
No. This just means that the chinese century is now over and chinas economy will lose again to the US.

>>108776711
So the Chinese are shooting themselves in the foot but Amerimutts are waiting for company funded UBI?
Lol

>>108776660
it's quite easy to overcome this, all they need is just to make another company and not hire many people from the start.

>>108777530
Elites are too afraid of popping the AI bubble

>>108776711
China will enforce this for the time being and observe how USA deals with AI automation causing huge job losses. If USA economy is able to survive the job loss with some UBI and other such policies then China will implement the same and let companies fire its workers

>>108776660
I work for an American company that outsources a lot of its workers.
Managers are complaining because when they fired someone from India, they had to pay severance.

>>108777173
/thread

>>108776711
>chinese workers protected
>america will become the 3rd world shithole where citizens are exploited to provide cheap labor for the only people who can afford it (chinese and jews and the epstein class)
uh... based???

>>108776660
Look, once all the billionaires all trillionares, it will ALL trickle down. They will just hand out free money and goods while their fully automated robot factories create everything we need.

Sure, we basically told you the same lie when the multi millionaires turned into billionaires, but... just believe it again, you dumb fuck.

>>108776660
Americans don't want regulations because they say that's "nanny state" and "overreach"
They want to be fucked in the ass and enslaved, let them. It's their Anglo nature

>>108776660
They'll happily work them to death, though. Slimy fucking bugmen.

>>108776711
Chicoms speedrunning EU-style regulatory burden hypoefficency is nice, but we've got the same brand of idiots trying to do it here and it's still impossible to build things in half our states so I'm not that bullish.

>>108777530
https://x.com/Mayoveli/status/2050173495405891625
cope. the US could NEVER build some shit like this. you're too goymaxxed. inb4 the grapes are sour

>>108776660
cool, so I expect all CNC milling to halt in china while they get reaquainted with chisels

This is a strange admission that workers aren't needed except artificially. I feel like that's a really heavy thing to admit, and kind of strange to maintain facade for no real reason. You admit that your workers are not the best for the job, and that you will keep them around anyway, to the detriment of everyone else that now has to be limited by all the workers who are underperforming. And the only reason is pride? Appeal to tradition? Who actually wins here besides employees that are already measured to be worse than the average, why would you intentionally hold on to that. Do you not care about your company, the other workers, your customers?

File: 1645886755106.jpg (353 KB, 1559x567)

353 KB JPG

>>108776660
The powers that be have a new system that has been in the development for decades now, ready to be rolled out in the coming years. It will operate in parallel starting sometime this year and by the next decade it will be fully operational as the Agenda 2030 goals are slowly being implemented.
There will be no collapse, no violence, no uprising, no world war, no draft, no revolution, no killing of jews or politicians or other such fantasies. Instead there will be law & order, compliance and total surveillance until the very end. AI will be at the center of it all.

The Great Reset is inevitable.

>>108780603
So... your solution is to just let them starve? Jesus Christ the west is full of mentally ill retards like you.

>>108780911
China is not "the west".
>your solution is to just let them starve
As opposed to what? In the actual west that is how it works. If you want to be paid you have to work a job, and if you can't do that you get fired.
Ironic for you to bring up the mentally ill when you're espousing for the free welfare of them at the expense of you and me both.

>>108776660
I like free markets but I really think AI might be incompatible with them.
Between AI and capitalism, I choose capitalism.

>>108780603
This very much depends.
Blue collar work including both skilled and unskilled labor will always be a requirement. AI and robotics aren't there yet and everyone needs to eat.
White collar and most office work is massively overinflated for the amount of workers and the work that is necessary

Lots of office work has performance metrics that are either disregarded at an individual level or are so minimal and abstracted away from the actual hard metrics of the company's performance.

This is propped up by the fact that payroll is accounted for before profits. Of course when profits are down people are laid off because fiduciary duty dictates you lower operational expenses to increase margins but in general as along as companies remain profitable and growth is recorded companies will hire and keep people even if they contribute little to nothing for that success.

As someone who has seen both worlds. There is a not insignificant population of white collar/office workers who are employed solely because they fit in socially or hired with nepotism and for that they are rewarded. The work is secondary.

Arguably this is one of the main reasons the "economy" can grow and it's by making better consumers by elevating incomes. Of course not everyone can join in and there are "requirements" but a lot of it is arbitrary for a good portion of these "workers".

>>108777367
>several of whom were migrants
So they let off a bunch of good White German lads too then? Meaning it wasn't a case of giving immigrants special treatment, and the only person who actually got BTFO (both literally and figuratively) was the foid? Pretty based for once, Germany.

>>108780911
>solution is to just let them starve
What purpose do useless people serve, and who would bother to keep them around? I'll tell you right now the "ebil corporations" will not willingly give their shekels away, and the western politicians who are supposed to be putting policies in place that benefit their constituents are instead pushing policies that benefit the corporations (who bribe them with C level positions and "donations").

>>108777326
The top 10% earners already account for over 60% of all consumer spending. This number is only growing, and growing faster and faster. People below median income are already economically irrelevant. Wake up

>>108776660
you lived to see the chinese being more humane than so called "western" countries lmao

cant wait for trash americans to get hunted down worldwide

>>108776660
AI is not cheaper so they can still fire workers :)
They aren't doing it for any objective reason, they're doing it for the hype.