I fucking love MIT, MIT is the future of software. I am going to make so much fucking money off of you people.
Stallman was right about everything.Fuck capitalism and fuck cucklicencers.
my open source project is gpl3 AND I use AI
>>108779605>hehe im so progressive i'm going to use the most open license i can think of so that anyone can do whatever they want with my work>nooo people are doing whatever they want with my work noooooget a life
>>108779641Stallman is old, dying of cancer, and broke as fuck. Why do you people worship losers?
>>108779605a license change wouldn't have prevented that AI users don't care about license. His mistake was publishing the source for his software.
>>108779641Stallman said that Free Software has only ever existed under capitalism, is completely compatible with capitalism, and takes ideas from capitalism. Stallman complains about extreme capitalism (ie crony capitalism) which I'd a populist stance not a communist one, so stop being a retarded commie
>>108779676streetshitter or kike, call it
>>108779848Crony capitalism is capitalism in its purest form, the system is working as intended, it means a for of capitalism where the corporations rule the government and society, basically a world where capitalism won, are you enjoying it?
>>108779641All code should be Public Domain.
cuck license
turns out that what foss commies wanted was control of the works of others all along>>108779641this is completely compatible - integral - to (claimed) freetard philosophy THOUGH. does software not want to be free?
>>108779848>>108779914National Socialism, with Corporatism is the best system of governance. Ironically enough, the closest thing to this is Xi Jinping's China in current year.
>>108779942>>108779848>NOOOO you must allow Indians using AI to steal your project and turn it into shit or you are le communist
>>108779914I would say that trading capital is capitalism in its purest form. I think what you mean is the logical conclusion of unchecked capitalism, but you're a moron so what can I expect
>>108779961that is the fundamental goal of foss, yes. what did you think 'for any purpose' meant? they've been pretty explicit.i do understand that the mentally disabled, eg autistic, may find such implications, blatant as they are, unexpected
>>108779641>>108779605>>108779932Proprietary (including freeware) software is the only viable release model since 2022.Any other license is getting shit stolen from you while you get poorer and eventually homeless while others become trillionaires like Elon Musk.
>>108779993>he thinks copilot isn't stealing code from private proprietary reposlmaoing at u
>>108779641Linus Torvalds and Brendan Eich deserve more praise than Stallman.
>>108779848IP and copyright law aren't even capitalism anyway, they're older than capitalism and come from mercantilist England.
>>108779650>>108779605how does GPL protect you against vibecoded stealing anyway? the model has been trained on your code and it can regurgitate it, but how will you prove that this happened? how will you even know?
>software wants to be free>noooooo not like that
>>108779676Being called a loser in clownworld means you're doing good, it's a compliment.>>108780041>>108779991>>108779942The purpose of free software is to create and ecosystem and community with certain values that are aligned with the interests of the user, that's what "free" means in this context.Licenses are a means to an end.>>108779993No, but I do believe that FOSS must change into something more closed if we want good outcomes from it, something like source-available but you can only collaborate under certain conditions and only fork under certain conditions.The current meta of corporations and AI getting code for free while developers starve is completely unsustainable.
>>108779605>choose a license that allows specifically that>be made that it happens
>>108779641>use a license that allows anyone to steal your work>somebody steals it>f-fuck capitalism!Are you retarded?
>proprietards getting uppity lately
I wouldn't expect to make money off of an open source softwareJust make it proprietary or garner some sort of fanbase / community
>>108780001>he stores his code on someone else's computerlollmao even
>>108780186and the end is communism. your definition of the interests of the users seems to be entirely at odds with the actual user, in this case the guy forking it.
>>108780242freetards come in two flavors, lying hypocrites and actual retards that don't understand the basic implications of what they preach
>>108779605Doesn't matter how much money you make, you'll still be generic soulless cuck
>>108779605This happened to me. Some nigger made a slopped up fork of my program, so I decided I will go closed source from now on.
>>108779605Claude fucked his girl, and he just sat watching.
>>108779961the point isn't that he must, the point is that he did and is now having second thoughts.
>>108780007Linus Techtips and Brandon Who aren't deserving of praise.
>>108779605hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah cuck license not even once
>>108779641Get a job you worthless faggot
>>108779947>Be parasitic "nation">Tell everyone you "numba 1" whilst chanting your gay ass nationalist anthem >Suck the wests cock for IP and contracts that you use local slave labor to satisfy.>Ris is crosest thing to pure capitalism. America soo stupid threy make a service economy.It's fun buying chinkshit knowing some malnourished, limp wristed, conformist chink worked 40 hours per day to bring me for a price soo low I can buy multiples >Inb4 prease move to China, whypipo. Please.
>>108779605As other anons already said, at this point the move is to do your public projects as closed-source shareware since your code will get stolen no matter what license you use.>>108780186>I do believe that FOSS must change into something more closed if we want good outcomes from itTwo things wrong with what you just said:1) This one's just me extrapolating what you said so feel free to disregard this point, but I'm assuming when you said FOSS you meant it in the way GPL means it. You can already change this idea of free software into something else as the MIT license has done, but at that point it's no longer GPL. Hell, the FSF constantly breaks freedoms 0 and 1 already with how they denounce most distros for letting the user run nonfree software on them, so the concept of FOSS is basically open to interpretation as is.2) We currently live in a post-ethics environment, one much more hostile to ethics than even the 90's with Microsoft's lawfare letting them do whatever they want. Mag 7 companies will simply steal any exposed code on the internet, free or leaked, and the response to complaints about this breaking license agreements will just be "what the fuck are you gonna do about it?". It's been like this since at least 2021 when art started being stolen, first for NFT's and later for image generation, and expanded to Github using all code hosted on it for machine learning, MIT license or otherwise.
>>108781572Nta anon, however,>1. move is to do your public projects as closed-source shareware since your code will get stolen no matter what license you use.Please elaborate >2. Is 1. The only solution you're thinking about?
>>108779914Thats like saying cancer is cells in their purest form
>>108779605>hey here's my code you can use it for whatever you want!>beep boo boo bop>NOOO NOT LIKE THAT THAT'S ILLEGAL
>>108781598>elaborateJust work on your shit but only release the binaries when they're ready
Lets see where we landed anonshttps://strawpoll.com/mpnb18LPYy5
I use MIT because my code is worthless, and in the hopes that others will use MIT for their code so I can steal it without the hassle of viberizing it.
what don't people get about free as in FREEDOM
>>108781612>Thats like saying cancer is cells in their purest formCancer is when a small number of cell grows without limit for their own egoistical survival until they kill the whole system, it's a very good analogy for billionaries actually, they are literally cancerous cells in capitalist society and yes what I am implying is that this is the natural conclusion of capitalism.Marx predicted this 150 years ago.
>>108781676Once you'll get a little older and a little wiser you'll find out just how much worse things would be under the natural conclusion of communism.
>>108779914you know what you call a system where a small group of politically aligned actors representing a much larger group of stakeholders meet behind closed doors to decided the economic policy of the state?
>>108781748Q: What do "remember about communism" and "remember about the holocaust" have in common?A: They are both used by kikes to deflect critique of their cancerous system.I know who is to blame for the mess we are in, and is sure not a dead ideology from the last century.>>108781842The Federal Reserve? The EU Commission? Uhmm maybe the Davos World Economic Forum?
>>108781121Linus created Linux and Git.Eich created JavaScript and founded Mozilla.
>>108779848>extreme capitalism (ie crony capitalism)Oxymoron. "crony" means the corporations receive special favours or protections from the government. This only happens in a mixed economy, as a pure capitalist system would constitutionally not allow collusion with the government, and the government would be limited in its power so collusion is barely even possible. A populist stance (a la Trump) actually increases cronyism.
>>108779605>infinite canvas....what the fuck is the point in this?
>>108779855Stallman is a kike obviously.
>>108781896all communist organizations, correctone of the biggest banks is literally named vanguard, how much more blatant do you need it
>>108781676There will always be a small group of people with a disproportionate amount of money, that's just the pareto distribution, one of the fundamental laws of nature.Also the billionaires today are not the same billionaires 20 years ago. A better analogy than cancer would be a lava lamp, where individuals and corporations beat the competition and rise to the top, only to lose their initial momentum and fall behind. What is closer to cancer is the ever expanding government. We need a government but a much more limited one.
>>108782119>Also the billionaires today are not the same billionaires 20 years agodepends on you mean the real billionaires like the rothschild family, or just manufactured state front men like musk and brin
>>108782128>manufactured state front men like musk and brinlmao>rothschild familyThey're much less influential now than in the 19th century. If they really were a cancer they would just continue to accrue power until nothing else remained.
>>108779650>my open source project is gpl3 AND I use AIit can't be both, because AI generated code cannot be copyrighted, sweetie
