>AI is unprofitable but it also makes more revenue than google
>>108780937>trajectory
>>108780937Ridiculous projections thread? Hold my Itanium.
>>108781039I'll dump a few as well.
>>108781052
>>108781059
>>108781064
>>108780937>Trajectory >Revenue
>>108780937what kind of subhuman retards fall for these
>>108781072you will never live in the universe where disco record sales account for the entire world economy
>>108780937>forecast>by a private equity goon>who defnitely has investments in Anthropic
>>108781096HOLY year of linux gaming within my life time
>>108780937Revenue =/= profit. Please learn finance.
>>108781089They're called investors apparently.
>>108781096total Linux victory
you're living through the singularity:)
>>108780937I"m thankful that they helpfully pointed out that the place where the lines cross is the 'crossover'
>>108781215>IEAThat's a fossil fuels lobbying group lol, of couse they'll "predict" that renewables will magically slow down and go away.
>>108780937It's unprofitable because it's not a stable product. All these companies have runaway R&D spending because they're pouring more money into it tomorrow than they did today. Just serving the current models would definitely be profitable, which is what those chinese model providers are doing. In reality it's extremely unlikely that the chinese models are cheaper to run than the paid american ones, they just don't worry about the R&D spend because they can just distill it from GPT and claude. Same as what XAI is doing, which is why they're offering bottom rate pricing on grok.
>>108780937Baby's first "revenue vs profit" moment.
>>108780937>what is profit>what is revenue
>>108780937Let me know when AI creates more jobs than it destroys.
>>108781096jej
>>108780937>100B is more than 465B?
>>108781727Logarithms
>>108781655not even revenue, anonit's estimated revenue now;;;;;; projections. get with the times.
>>108781744It's sloptastic futurenavelgazing (I need those as words in English, stat).
You guys are making fun of projections but don't underestimate jewish money schemes. Market is designed to make fools of everyone.
>>108780937AI slop chart?
>>108781744>403B is more than 1T
>>108781096y'all naysayers are gonna feel real silly in 2043 mark my words
i love this thread
>>108781890that's when the gnu hurd is ready and takes away all linuxxers
>>108781923basedthe hurd is the wurd
>>108781890Too bad the universe stops existing in 2038
>>108780937When are we going to come back down to reality
>>108781890literally heard that 20 years agoyear of linux on the desktop any day now
>>108780937
>>108782127
>>108781215No, we're living through a money laundering scheme that is gonna make the Asian Crash of '97 look quaint.
>>108781744based retard
>>108780937> literally incapable of making a profit> somehow passing alphabetkek
>>108781096Why does this chart stop at 100%
>>108782231what would more than 100% mean in this context
>>108782270Don't worry about that. Just extrapooooolate. More = better.
>>108782060Why did intel even shoot up like that in the last 2 weeks? What happened?
>>108782354Apple rumors and Terafab and the AI Race heating up with China Taiwan tensions also not being the best all compounding. Oh and 18A processing coming up online better than expected, meaning they will probably be able to catch up to TSMC soon which really would be around 2030 or so.
>>108782270People having Linux on several devices.
>>108781064I like her thinking posture, very cute:)
>mfw reading this thread
Incel software devs are being wiped out by chad and stacey! Reminds them of high school ! Sad !
>>108780937did they ai generate this chart?
>>108782354Their fabs are starting to do a lil somethin somethin. Turns out Pat Gelsingers plan of build build build kinda worked out.Also there’s rumors tim apple jr. might be buying from them.
>>108783020Considering its anthropic, yeah most likely.
>>108780937Until Anthropic and OpenAI file their S-1 before their IPO you should take any ARR numbers they release with a mountain of salt. If these startups were actually generating huge amounts of cash then they shouldn't need tens of billions of funding every few months from hyperscalers and venture capital.
>>108780937>y-axis doesn't start at 0
>>108782354>>108783153Intel also has *gasp* decent productsIntel Xeons have better internal bandwidth than Epyc and are better value than Epyc.Hyperscalers bought Intel because they made sense.How we go to this point where because Intel couldn't satisfy retarded gaymers that they are worthless is beyond me.
>>108781052Yeah but they couldn't expect that silicon just didn't work right at that speed. There was zero indication.You want to see something funnier, check Intels roadmap prior hitting the 14mm wall.
>>108780937Profitability doesn't really have any correlation to how much money you make in the first place. If you spend 10 trillion dollars to make a healthy 5 trillion, to say you're making an absurd amount of money is an understatement. Yet you're spending double that to get there.
>>108780937the fucj is that Y axis
AI is never sold as what it is, it's always sold as "what it will be", lmao.
>>108780937no where close to being true. AI isn't really AI anyways. just more tech slop to get sub revenue from.
>>108780937anons to everyone who thinks this shit could be profitable without huuuuge price increases remember that geforce now premium is 22 bucks per month, at least in my country, and that is only a rtx5080 equivalent.There models run in hardware that are what two orders of magnitude as expensive, and the trainings costs are brutal, while geforce now its basically a custom virtual machine
>>108780937I don't understand the copes. Companies pay for claude almost everywhere and even if it costs 1k$/month per employee it's still worth it. I don't see how the revenue would flatline.
>>108780937AI is free online. If not, just go to a new site that is. I have 2 machines that are setup for AI now. Why pay for it?
>>108786383Incorrect, snailcat. AI is the future. AI has replaced 99% of software devs and enhanced the remainder 1000x. Face it. You lost and AI won.
>>108780937>projectedAlso revenues is not profit. I plan to buy into their IPO but this is a very misleading chart
>>108786771bc the actual cost is waaay above that
>>108787271First world companies pay 10k+$/month per employee. Anything below that is enough to replace him. I really doubt inference on Opus is more expensive than this, at least on a yearly timescale. If govts add carbon tax and shit then maybe. Mythos may be more expensive too, but it's not for daily dev work.
AI-slopped graph. Nobody that made it past high school would create a scale this fucking retarded
>>108780937If I make up numbers that make us look good and make up numbers that make Google look bad I can look like I'm making more money than Google!!
>>108782464if valve can get arm proton working well enough to officially support steam on android this is possible
>>108787516I too like misleading investors, Steve apple's keynote graphs were my favorite
>>108788205This retard is ACTUALLY misleading investors THOUGHhttps://x.com/JosephJacks_/status/2052569028397515063
>>108781935>the hurd is the wurdthe wurd rhymes with hurd, sure
>>108787516why does it matter if both google and anthropic are on the same scale?
>>108781096100% linux in 23 years? Why so pessimistic?
