APPLE IS GOING BACK TO INTEL
>>108782658Possibly the Intel foundry, not the architecture. Shame about your brain injury.
>>108782658Yes, to manufacture their processors, not to make Intel chips for Apple.
>>108782782>>108782803I thought the contract they signed to buy ram from Samsung was contingent on them also using Samsung's fab for their phone chips?
>>108782858Apple makes a ton of chips and they can spread the love around
>>108782658ah yes, "The Trump Administration pushed for this change"No wonder the stock doubled in price since April 23rd. Bunch of insider trading dicks. The least they could do is tell me first so I could make money too.
>>108782870Having a healthy and productive domestic foundry is a strategic necessity. The insider trading is another matter but Congress has refused to do anything about it for decades so what do you expect. Either way it's good for us to have domestic chip production.
American-made Apple Silicon chips. Let's go.
>>108782658intel bought ASML High-NA that is faster but not better performance at printing will need 1 pass vs 4 passes (simplified) so they will print the low end apple chips there cheaper
>>108782658Probably Intel modems.
>>108782870They've literally been plastering the state backing of until since Trump regained office. It's been known as Intel Aviv for long ass time, since at least his first term. If you knew that Trump converted to Judaism just like Nero, it's obvious where it's going.
>>108782658>drop 99.9999% software compatibility in the desperate chase for battery efficiency>alienate all professional customers>alienate all developers>cheat with hardware accelerators in web browsing to make up for ARM being total shit in real workloads>get utterly destroyed in battery life anyway 3 years later by intlel and ayymdARM is dead, and iCucks will bend over at take it up the ass when applel is forced to switch back to x86 and deprecates all their shit apps for the 10th time
>>108783380intel is making arm chips for them my man. https://newsroom.intel.com/intel-foundry/intel-arm-team-up-power-startupsthey've been working with arm for a couple of years now.
>>108782658Intel had one opportunity to force apple to agree to release a limited amount of MacBooks with panther lake chips and they fucking blew it.If there were some limited release of 100k units I guarantee they'd sell about before any other apple device would and it would prove that the market would prefer that partnership over any other arrangement between the two.
>>108783749*They would sell out
>>108783749Nobody wants x86 shit.
>>108783380>drop 99.9999% software compatibility99.9999% of useful software has native Apple Silicon builds.
>>108783778>Muh siliconEverybody wants X86 shit.
>>108783814>>108783778no one wants your currynigger silicon shit
>>108782658you're an idiot; they're not going to use intel chips, apple is going to make their chips on intel fabs.
Why is the US gov trying to save Intel so desperately?
>>108783380A fab is a fab. It can make an Intel chip just as well as an amd chip or an apple chip
>>108782658>Trump administration pushed for the dealIt's a show deal to kiss Trump's ring so as not to get their products made in China tariffed. It's a nothingburger
LONG LIVE x86.ARM is for faggots and chinks because they can't afford x86
