Fedora/RedHat approved. It's safe to upgrade now.
>>108784703major release means its ABI breaking? should i upgrade?
>>108784703>7.0.4-200.fc44.x86_64>7.0.4Isn't that version still vulnerable to Dirty Frag? Why not skip it in favor of 7.0.5? It's literally one change: https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v7.x/ChangeLog-7.0.5
>>108784765>major release means its ABI breaking?No, Linus just increments the major version whenever he feels like it.
>>108784765>Breaking userspaceIt won't Mauro.
>>108784811Announcement from Fedora's Security Special Interest Group in the forum:>Just an update. The fixes for DirtyFrag are pushing to stable right now. For Fedora 42, this is the 6.19.14-101 kernel. For Fedora 44 and Fedora 43, these are in the 7.0.4 kernel. There will be no 7.0.5 as it only contains a single patch which is already included in our 7.0.4 updates.
>>108784811You think Fedora does not know how to properly release packages? The changelog says the fix has been applied. If you see an upstream version, fiex can be pacakged by others with their own packages.7.0.4-200.fc44.x86_64 does not translate as an 1:1 copy from upstream. https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/kernel/kernel/fedora-44-updates.html
>>108784934Fedora is quite professional.
>>108784815doesnt that defeat the point of the 3 number versions?
>>108785125It's a suggestion.
Linux is in the same boat is as Steam. Once Linus and Gaben go, the show is over because you KNOW what's going to happen.
>>108784765It won't break
>>108784703>windows 7: 2009>linux 7: 2026Embarrassing
