why is AI trying to sneak mistakes into my code?
>>108786665Skill issue. Learn to vibeCODE
>>108786665>tryingthere are no intentions behind AIit generated text that was stasticially most likely to be the continuation of the previous text according to its weights.
>>108786686>it generated text that was stasticially most likely to be the continuation of the previous text according to its weights.also how human brains work btw
So you have to ask it to fix it, costing you another 3 dollars.
>>108786697retard
>>108786697lmao
>>108786838He's right, though. If AI isn't conscious then neither are humans.
>>108786697maybe yours lol
>>108786838>>108786840>>108786851luddnigger cope
>>10878666520 years ago this was industrial sabotage
>>108786665We trust the companies to give us what the want from their black boxes. However, they make money when you use generate tokens. Therefore it is in their interest to cause more token utilization. There is no reason to think they will give us what we want for as cheap as we want it.
>>108786999Fuck me, so much for proofreading. Point invalidated I guess.
>>108786999but then their competitors can... oh, I get it now
>>108787092i dont. care to explain?
they are trying to be le epic troll just like the human they were trained on :D
>>1087872001) Users don’t provide the benchmarks.2) success of the companies is measured in subscriptions, not in quality of products produced with the models3) an inferior product can still out-compete a competitor through various means such as marketing,4) these models are black boxes, you cannot tell how the companies are designing them5) now that the flash is over, revenue will speak loudest to investors, and raising the price is not the only way to increase revenue: increasing usage can as well6) these models can give you exactly what you want, or maybe it won’t. Meta hired psychologists to design social media to be as addictive as possible, these ai companies can social engineer as well (“that’s a very insightful question!”).Just a few considerations
>>108786697Human brains are not text generators, so your statement is incorrect.
>>108787492they predict thoughts instead of text
>>108787496It seems like you're starting to understand the difference, you're on the right track.
>>108787496they don't tho
>>108786697lmfao
>>108786665it has a sense of humor
>>108786697>NO U!!
>>108786850>>108786697You do get they'te completely different neural structures that support different operations, right?
>Sorry I've renamed all the variables in the script you asked me to look at>>Use the same variables >I put 90% of the back and renamed a few and made some new ones for no reason, but here's what you requested>>What the fuck, why do you do this? I'm just going to code on my own again.Vibeshitters are zonked on some gnarly snacks, Scoob
>>108786850>If AI isn't conscious then neither are humans.Maybe (You) aren't conscious. That can happen with some types of brain damage.
>>108788297More to the point, part of your brain is dedicated to trying to construct a consistent model of the world, to throwing away the crazy bits that the LLM-like parts spit out all the time. The sense of self and consciousness likely comes from that.Crazy things happening in dreams are because the consistency part of the brain is still partially offline.
>>108786672Not an argument, spammer.
>>108786955libtardautismo arrest
>>108786672Why is it that every time someone writes likeTHIS the post is absolute mouthbreathing pile of shit?
lol
>>108786665poor prompting skills, take a prompt engineer course. >>108786697good bait, pretendin to be a redditor.
>>108786665Why do you give it access to your code?
