have the retards at anthropic completely lost it?
>>108794316Did they ever have anything?
>>108794316I saw this posted on reddit 13 days ago
>>108794316looks fake and gay
>>108794316they never had it to begin with
>>108795375just like ace thruster
>>108795442That's disturbing. I hate all these big corporations. They don't have to be evil but they always find a way to be maximally evil.
>>108795522corporations are psychopaths. that's not some "I hate corporations!" ideological statement. they are, objectively, psychopaths by their very nature.
>>108795442how is destroying the book the safer option?They're destroying books because they don't want to get sued by the copyright holders but if they're so rare than there's surely no extant copyright holder left that is even aware they have an actionable lawsuit?
>>108794316Fake + Gay.
>>108796584just like ace thruster tho
>>108795442>>108796557Use case for not destroying books?Why would they store some old ass fucking book taking up physical space when they can just burn it, meaning nobody else gets access to it and they don't have to worry about it anymore.As you age yuo will realize that having less things is more valuable than having lots of things.
>>108797145turd worlder spotted
women
>>108795442JFC I hate everything. They're not even saving the fucking scans, they delete the scans after it's fed into the AI and subsequently lost forever. They could resell the books but no
>>108794344>he went on readOh my, what an embarrassing admission!
>>108796557>but if they're so rare They're scanning everything, the rare books are part of a trove that includes every book, and if they get caught simply ignoring copyright law so they can steal all of it right now, then the government would likely put a stop to it even if nobody was around to say 'no'. The government doesn't even let you run an archive with 80 year old movies from WW2 in them despite the fact all of its directors and actors are dead.
>>108797145>Use case for not destroying books?Take your pick, on every level it's fucking dumb.>Financially These books cost money and would have value on the second hand market>Historically These books, if rare enough, may not have any scans anywhere. We rely on the internet archive and other online resources to scan books, and those are volunteer services >Scientifically Even if you don't care about the books and you don't care about the money you want the originals around to verify the accuracy of the data that the models were trained on. If you put in a book that says X, and it instead decides to interpret it as not X, they can never know now, as they have destroyed the originals AND the scans. It's how you get stupid shit like it telling people to put glue on pizza from a reddit post while ignoring every cookbook in its memory. Worse, depending on how niche these books are (again we don't even get titles of what was fed into it as that's effectively admitting to felony copyright infringement) we may never know what was destroyed. There are just ISBN numbers out there with no living replica of what it describes. This 100% seems like a legal move from a retarded lawyer trying to think of ways to break the law but not get caught for it in court instead of a move by any AI scientist or CEO.
>>108797145>use case for notStopped reading right there. Bait disregarded.
