>Saaars, we made basic window render in mere 94 millisecond! Saaar please do not revoke H1B, we do great work for you here at MicroSaarHow does such a clownshow get promoted as an improvement?
>>108796372it's megaseconds, not milliseconds
5 frames at 60hz is actually pretty pathetic.
sometimes i miss linux holy shit. still better than using wayland THO.
>>108796372>no title bar text>no browse button >no close button>no cancel button because options other than close button are great>no OK button>pane/panel cannot be moved>pane/panel will disappear when you click outside its boundaries to force close itSARRRRR
>>108796372They spent 1 month with a team of 12 people to do this simple feature.
you don't understand. they need the run menu being fast and performant to increase the effectiveness of the fake captcha scam. where they load a malicious command into your clipboard and the captcha asks you to press win+r, then ctrl+v and then enter. the slower this process is the more time the user has to realize that it might not be a good idea.
>>108796563you are an actual retards, it's not even funny
They're also experimenting with a 'low latency' mode to temporarily boost the processor to make the interface run a bit faster. Seriously.
>>108796372>wow I'm so excited!!!!!hahahahahahahahaha
>>108796372
>>108796372hasn't someone already debunked it? the old run dialog needs like 30ms or so to open
legitimately how do you fix all windows issues without carpet bombing all offices and having them rewrite the os from scratch without seeing previous version's code
>>108796511take the xlibre pill, anon
>>108796563>>108798083Sir, tell me, what is the use case for this features? I tryed to ask cloud code to explain but out of tokens so u must say what that is?
Oh look, windows is finally catching up to KDE lol
>>108798083I have never used this button.
>>108798083Nobody "browses" from run.exe to execute a file. It's redundant. You run things you know the name or path of.
>>108798147>>108798430>>108798508good morning sir,please do not redeem the browse button. it is decreasing the performance if the ui is to render an additional button, sir.
Normalfags don't use the run command, this was not necessary
>>108796372Why does it take 94ms to show a text input box?
>>108798533browse your way into an early grave, weakling
>>108796372I bet it's an Electron app.
>>108796372Wheres the Start button?
Embarrassing
>>108798633I love Electron apps I make them usung Cloud code.
>>108798140>use xLibre>pc krashes bc schizo dev hates blacks or some shitya no thanks
>>108798696Well… don’t be black I guess?
>>108798620I will RAPE you, NIGGER.
>>108796372Drawing almost eleven text boxes per second. Truly we are living in the future.
>>108798706Thankfully I'm not but I hate schizo pol tards more than the wokeies
>>108798760Sirs, please no need raping today sirs
>>108798430This, I don't understand the point of using the run dialogue box if you aren't just gonna run something.
>>108798088there's no one left in microslop who could understand the actually good parts of the code, let alone write it from scratch with no reference.
>>108798571Because the button is preloaded, and that's why it's so efficient: as soon as you boot up the OS it starts a Run dialog process which runs in the background.It gets shown whenever you need to use it.
>>108798088Windows, the system level kernel and core components, are actually pretty damn performant. People managed to get used to Windows 10, after all. The ideas around windows aren't bad.The problem has always been Microsoft racing to the bottom by cutting things they views as secondary like artists and graphical designers and hiring turd worlders who only recently got computers to their favela to design everything. That's why we get abominations like 3 control panels, explorers that take minutes to start, and giant bars that can't be moved on the graphical user interface whose advantage is that anything on it can be moved. Favelamonkeys and Currysweatshops are the cause of all of Windows suffering, and not the system programmers.
>>108798633everything is an electron appfind the modern program that isn't
>>108798083>open explorer.exe>navigate to exe>double click itwow, so hard.why the fuck are you using the run dialog to do this?
>>108797758Even with top of the line PCs I imagine making even one change to windows takes hours to compile and test. I work on a pretty large codebase thats not even a fraction of what windows must be and it can get pretty hairy. Indians or not I wouldn’t expect windows development to be fast at all
>>108796372It only takes 6 frames to show this stupid, simple window! In that time, a game engine from 20 years ago would have been able to a full 3d scene with lighting, shading, shadows and what not 6 times, but in 2026, we manage to draw a single 2d fucking rectangle! Now this is performance to be proud of.
>>108799165>recompile windows for a ui changeplease don't procreate
>>108799274I don’t think you’ve ever worked on a c++ project before
>>108799274The whole Windows UI is under one big fat bloated explorer.exe
>>108796372>How does such a clownshow get promoted as an improvement?The """journalists""" are even more terminally retarded than the bootlickers in middle management at MS.
>>108796372More than likely it uses the old trick of starting it at boot or login time — thus consuming memory and making logins more sluggish — and they just do a ShowWindow() when you hit Win+R
>>108796372lmao whatever happened to moving everything back to winUI? is win11 going to remain the designated shitting grounds until win12?
>>108798760gay rapist, you are. angry and frustrated, you shall remain.
>>108796511I still use X11. Still works perfectly for anything I need. I tried out Wayland on a htpc I hooked up to my TV. STILL has the same rendering bugs it had 10 years ago. Still crashes. Still has all kinds of limitations. How crazy is that? It's older now than X was when they said X was old and needed rewriting. They still haven't managed to reach 1/10th of feature parity.>hurr durr it's just a protocolCope.
>>108800792You probably discovered what every wayland advocate never knew: high performance graphics doesn’t use X or wayland drawing primitives. It essentially opens up an window and the video card draws directly into it. Wayland or X don’t (neccesarily) know what goes on there unless they request a copy from the video card memory.It’s been done this way forever, since the Apple ][
>microsaar
>>108798571>Why does it take 94ms to show a text input box?it has to compile the Javascript first
>>108796372probably 94ms for something always in cache, absolutely garbage
>>108803575To be fair, just spawning a process in 94ms on Windows is impressive enough.
>>108799144Delete System 32
>>108796372>94ms>goodwow
>>108798806>t. wokieI haven't seen any evidence that the XLibre dev is some crazy /pol/tard besides leftoids seething over him and the fact he said "Make Xorg Great Again" (basically a meme at this point). The fact you jumped to him hating blacks reveals your actual opinions and likely the types of people who listen to and take advice from, ie woke
>>108799291>t. jobless retard in his mother's basement who learned C++ from pajeets on youtube>>108799338Ever heard of object files, linking and incremental builds?
>>108798147>>108798430>>108798508>>108799161ATOMIZE INDIA THIS ISN'T FUNNY ANYMORE. I HAT PAJEETS SO MUCH AAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH
>>108804559>knowing nothing at all about me>jumping to false "evidence" to accuse me of being wokei won't say it, but we all know what you are lol.>no evidence of pol tardahh yes the openly anti vax guy with the IRC channels that are hilariously regurgitating pol takes isn't a pol tard.>u wokieif being woke means I'm not retarded enough to put 0 effort into thinking about anything, ya I'm woke bro.
>>108798083usecase?
>>108796372windows finder would be greatindians need to be in concentration camps though
