>>108816420
Rust is actually pretty retard proof and you can easily get LLMs to the newest standard using one or two mcp servers to feed them crate documentation.

>>108816466
I asked for AI-RESISTANT, not AI-friendly.

>>108816420
A brand new programming language not present in the training data would probably be the best. Otherwise you have to go for the least used programming languages.

>>108816471
C, memory management still remains the ultimate filter.
COBOL is probably fucked judging by recent reports of banks using custom trained LLMs for COBOL migrations.

>>108816466
>uses LLMs
>has reading comprehension problem
naturally
>>108816420
Probably C++. LLMs struggle with it a lot.

>>108816420
There isn't one. Programming is a 100% solved issue for llms.
>>108816537
>Probably C++. LLMs struggle with it a lot.
Not at all in my experience. What would posess you to think such a thing with the sheer amount of training data available?

>>108816420
>Best practical vibe coding-resistant languages?
Probably a language that's popular with troons since they hate AI the most

>>108816527
You could make a programming language which requires that the programmer include slurs as part of any program.

>>108816537
>putting in more effort than a half hearted glance into /g/ posts
lol, dare I say it, lmao even

>>108816553
see >>108816466

>>108818015
Here's a (You) for consistent cringeposting.

>>108818046
You are trans and coder (codetrans)

>>108816548
Because the sheer volume is not all high-quality, and C is an exceptionally picky language requiring a lot of discipline to write well, where the slightest misplaced syntax mistake or missing macro parameter can silently lead to nasty runtime errors with segfaults, data corruption, and other disastrous behavior.

It's not that LLMs can't write C or C++. It's just a lot harder to catch and prevent the inevitable mistakes and hallucinations.

Program in x86 assembly, like God intended.