>has an unacceptable dogshit history UX compared to chromium or even safariyou dumb faggots i want to see what i visited in the last 1 minute to few hours, not the last 7 fucking daysHOW HARD IS IT TO MAKE HISTORY A FUCKING TIME-SERIES
>>108816813Submit a patch, talk is cheap.
>she doesn't set her browser to auto clear history on exitngmi
>>108816825why would i bother to submit to that bullshit? I will just vibecode something which generates my own UX using the sqlite database that stores all this shitor better, drop furryfox and use chromium only
>>108816813Is this a mobile issue? I haven't noticed anything of the sort on PC. I don't know what the extension situation is like on mobile outside of Firefox, but maybe you could use something Chromium instead for mobile if you're a heavy mobile user.
>>108816858no, desktop 140.8.0esr on debian 12the default history window it opens is dogshit compared to chromium's
>>108816874I don't know, mine opens on "Today" by default. Unless I'm missing your point. Then again, maybe the Linux versions are different.
>>108816889I think he means it opens in a separate window instead of a tab like chromium, and that's what triggers him.
>>108816898no you retardthe firefox history doesn't list things chronologically, only grouped by daychromium groups things in a timeseries which works much better (even if they're fags who auto-clear it after 3 months or whatever)
>>108816874isn't chromeshit's history a fucking html?miss me with that putting a browser in a browser web app shit
>>108816930doesn't matter how they do it, they do it superior, 99% of time i want to see something recent in my history, not some shit months backit should ALWAYS be a time series of sites unless you choose to view it otherwise
>>108816813If you don't like it make a better one and contribute it, retard.
>>108816973>>108816850the only reason i'm even using this inferior browser is this website thinks chromium requires a new email but not firefox
>>108816982It was the opposite not long ago, posting from Firefox was almost impossible for a few days.
>>108816913No need to be a meanie >w<
>>108816813Just put the history menu in the toolbar or sort the history sidebar by last visited. Problem solved and 100 times better than chrome
why do these fucking subhuman niggers not order the "by date and site" as "last visited" within each groupingi'm glad google is holocausting these DEI trannyniggers
>>108816813>has an unacceptable dogshit history UX compared to chromium or even safariGood thing you can change it.
>>108816813>dogshit history UXHow so? I get to put it in another monitor.
>>108816813I don't see the problem, the history UX in firefox seems to be working just fine for me , although you are free to make an extension / use a port to do what you need here.I miss old firefox, this is why I have my private fork
>>108816913>the firefox history doesn't list things chronologicallyYes it does you dumb drooling faggot, "sort by most recent visit" is the default
>>108819135>dumb drooling faggotseems oddly specific
>>108819140underage?
>>108819149Not at all. I'm 24, let me have my fun, dick.
