>>108819498
Monet was almost blind when he was painting these so they're just saying what they actually think about them without the fear of talking shit about one of the supposed masters.

>>108819498
>i actually added shit in this meal
>aha there was no shit, curious how you refused to eat it

>>108819498
gm sar

wow. such an epic troll

>>108819498
This has happened multiple times and people are still falling for it. Artists are literally retarded

>>108819553
more like
>aha there was no shit, curious how you described how much it stank
although i agree with >>108819548

>>108819498
Social media has always behaved like a hivemind, midwits and such get their opinions from the majority and will shit out some intellectual sounding bullshit to fit in with everyone else. It really hits you when you realize most of the planet is like this.

>>108819498
People in your screenshot sound way more eloquent than you.

>>108819498
I didn't inow they had anti AI posts generated by bots now
how does that make sense?

I'm inclined to believe most anti-ai posts are written by AI. There might be 1 real human in OPs picture.

you would be surprised by the amount of people who listen to ai songs on spotify without even realizing.

>>108819498
>half the replies in the screenshot are the same generated blocks
Fuck that is sad

>>108819498
>decieve people
>hahaha look at how dumb these people are for trusting (basic human instinct)

wow, epic troll. i dont want water or electricity anymore, thank you for showing me the light. luddites btfo.

>>108819502
>luddite
Tiel speak

>>108819498
oh noooooooooooooooo

File: Screenshot 2026-03-01 at (...).png (272 KB, 375x375)

272 KB PNG

>>108819498
I don't get it. What is this supposed to demonstrate besides people hating the very idea of getting subjected to AI slop?

>>108820676
that anti-ai schizos literally can't tell the difference

>>108820690
Ok. Let's say your slop generator beats the astronomical odds and shits out a Monet-quality image. You show it off trying to prove that AI "art" is as good as actual art, only to find out everyone hates you and your image just the same. What did you win?

>>108820676
>oh no you cant deceive people into revealing their biases

>>108820643
>>108820711
wrong quote

>>108820676
People hate the technology itself and everything made with it which is irrational and retarded. There is AI slop but there are also good ways to use AI, this is hard to grasp for some people

>>108820711
>revealing their biases
Who's been hiding their biases? Everyone hates you and everyone is open about it. What's your point?

>>108820720
>People hate the technology itself and everything made with it which is irrational and retarded
Why?

>there are also good ways to use slop generators
Maybe. Can you name one?

>>108820661
Not an argument, trans

Imagine not knowing the deep connections between tranners, "AI" and technocracy. /g/ is a failed normie board.

File: IMG_2579.jpg (192 KB, 534x528)

192 KB JPG

>>108820762
Shut up.
This is simple to understand
>do you like Ai? Yes? Then you are a chad Nazi vibeGOD
>do you hate AI? Yes? Then you are a Luddite snailcat transgender
Understood? Trans

File: 1765228128152775.png (442 KB, 800x450)

442 KB PNG

>>108819498
>>108820799

>>108820799
Failed normie.

File: IMG_2375.png (558 KB, 1971x819)

558 KB PNG

>>108820807
Snailcat beahavior.
Don’t you like it? Make your own imageboard called “4snailcat" and ban ai or some shit.

>>108820812
We are Nazis. AI is a Nazi tool

>>108820827
One positive quality National Socialism is that it would put all your likes in hard labor camps.

>>108820827
I think there is something wrong in your head

>>108820544
Eloquently retarded

File: IMG_3587.jpg (359 KB, 904x899)

359 KB JPG

>no I swear guys AI totally won't take all your jobs and community resources and continue to enrich the parasitical class

>>108820909
I think anything related to "AI" is cancerous and subhuman but the right side of your pic is the moral, rational and necessary outcome for anyone who defends a system with "jobs".

>>108820922
I don't disagree. The system can be improved. Further entrenching the technocapitalists genociding humanity is not the way.

>>108820544
And yet they are wrong.

>>108820941
>The system can be improved
Fleecing and then exterminating human cattle is the only way this system can be improved.

File: 56C43F91-BE1D-4623-85B0-5(...).jpg (286 KB, 1125x1484)

286 KB JPG

>>108820878
>>108820885
>>108820909
There’s nothing you can do about it

>>108820944
>And yet they are wrong.
Their basic thesis is that AI "art" is worthless trash and they're right about that. But they're normies and they're stuck reasoning in a framework that makes no principled distinctions between real and fake, so they confabulate whatever objections are expressible within that framework to justify their disdain.

>>108820948
So says the genocidal upper class yes. Unfortunately that thinking is a flawed ouroboros that leads society to collapsing itself.

>>108820957
I can project my conscientious rejection of this philosophy into the universe. If your bragging I can't stop the self mutilation of us all by a handful of participants, it's not the flex you think it is.

>>108820965
>muh art
the fact that a bunch of kikes managed to convince others (and maybe you) that multicolored diarrhea on canvas is "art" and that slicing a classical building in half with a few panes of glass and sheets of steel is "art" means that neither you, nor nobody else, has a right to declare what art is or is not
you couldn't spot a monet if he was painting it in front of you and neither could anyone of those retards

>>108820676

most people don't have the knowledge/skills to have on opinion on things they don't understand/practice.
People should be humiliated like that on a daily basis until : 1.They just admit they're simple ,2. they learn/practice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ne_supra_crepidam

unfortunaly now ((("""experts"""))) are as much dumb/paid shills so it doesn't help.

>>108820987
You are trans anyway

>>108820998
Bait harder

>>108821003
I won, trans

>>108820987
>So says the genocidal upper class yes
And they're right. They've bred you for their purposes. Human cattle ontology is encoded in your genes. You have no place outside of their niggercattle feeding lot, no more than a cow in the Amazon. It's their world and you are fully depending on their designs, so you will never have any leverage over them.

>>108820993
>most people don't have the knowledge/skills to have on opinion on things they don't understand/practice.
You don't need any special knowledge or skills to know that AI "art" is inherently trash, though. But they just don't realize this, so they think they have to justify that judgment by feigning competence they lack.

>>108820991
>a bunch of kikes managed to convince others (and maybe you) that multicolored diarrhea on canvas is "art"
Yeah, in roughly the same way they managed to convince a bunch of retards like you that AI slop is "art". What's your point?

>>108821023
cope. Artists are obsolete

>>108821009
>Your cattle
>Thus it's futile to resist culling
Falshe dichotomy slopmaxxing I see anon. Reddits that a way

>>108819498
No one likes AI except talentless weirdos that think they now have ability thanks to AI. it's like commies thinking they can now live like rich people since they took everyone else's shit away to "redistribute" to everyone.

>>108821042
You're not "resisting" anything, you're just using your allotted whining allowance to impotently whinge, using infrastructure they own and operate and can deny you at any time.

File: file_0000000084a071f4a9e2(...).png (2.86 MB, 1693x929)

2.86 MB PNG

>>108819498

>>108821033
>fully generic seething point
I accept your concept.

At least they are spot on in the sense that AI is by definition fake. If they were fooled it would just mean that the inauthentic content is getting harder to spot, aka, the situation is worse.

If a pajeet calls your grandma to scam her, and instead of being obvious, is very skilled a scam that you could also fall of, that doesn't make it any better.

>>108821055
Oh sorry, "passiveness is anticipated" is the proper nomenclature I guess to define your still false dichotomy.

>>108821077
They couldn't appreciate a Monet for what it was, thus they don't appreciate art at all (and neither do you)
If your first reaction against that painting is trash talking it, you do not know what art is. If an AI had been able to paint that then it would be art period.

>>108821080
I don't know what your retarded babble is about but I know 100% you're never going to launch any attacks on corporate data centers or kill any cops/politicians/CEOs, which counts as a complete concession of all my points. :^)

>>108821091
It's ok I know you don't understand how to parse english. I would be very surprised if you weren't at best a bad actor

>>108821086
>They couldn't appreciate a Monet for what it was, thus they don't appreciate art at all
That mainly points to the fact that """AI""" is polluting culture in a way that makes art harder to appreciate.

>>108821099
>parse
Subhuman brown jeet outs himself. Whatever sins the global oligarchy may have under its belt, wiping out India's entire population using genetically engineered diseases would be enough of a good deed to absolve them.

>>108821117
You have the wrong framework in the brain, sar! Learn to parse English!!!

>>108821107
>That mainly points to the fact that """AI""" is polluting culture in a way that makes art harder to appreciate.
That's exactly the endgame. His handlers don't want you to be able to look at another human creation again without having ugly paranoid thoughts. No culture for the useless eaters. :^)

>>108821107
No. If you could tell what art is you wouldn't care where it came from.

>>108821117
>>108821130
>Your brown
Low energy. This is your best demoralization? Have some panache, ask chad GPT to write you a green text or something. Does it make you seethe I have ontological superiority to your shit demoralization slop?

>>108821160
It's like agreeing the Nazi uniforms looked good even if you're not a Nazi. If you
>didn't know that was a Monet painting
>hated AI
>was told it was an AI painting
>truly knew what art is

your reaction should be
>It's a masterfully painted piece and AI has reached the level of the masters, but I hate AI because it's not human
Just like I wouldn't say that the Hugo Boss uniforms of the SS were bad simply because I'm not a Nazi

>>108821086
dude, the entire internet is being flooded with inauthentic content. if you go to a museum, they wont have AI art, so this is not a real problem for people who enjoy paintings, but think about what they did to social media:

i go on youtube, see a video with an interesting title, and click it because im curious.

it used to be that this video would be made by someone who put time and thought into it, this doesn't necessarily make it better, but it does matter to me and MANY other people. it used to be that it would reflect someone's views and thoughts, which is definitely important and part of why people would watch a video. it also would be different in style from other videos.

now, you get that sometimes, but most of the time, they waste your time with something inauthentic. because some indian thought it would be awesome to automate the entire workflow, voice, video, and even the idea and the text that's read. wow, so efficient! but what kind of idiot would be ok with that content?

this AI content is unreliable, the facts are made up half the time. what is being said not reflect anyone's actual views or thoughts. the time it took to make was a tiny fraction of the time it takes you to watch it. all of this technically "doesnt matter", but in practice, people value authenticity so it matters. it also is generic, always the same, and always sounds like a polite robot. this is technically fixable with AI, but it would still be fake and dishonest, just harder to spot.

this is fucking annoying. i cant even find new things to watch from youtube recommendations. i have wasted a LOT of time so far, since AI came out, reading the start of articles that turned out to be AI, and clicking on video recommendations that are AI. its a real problem, idiot, not some shit snobs say to feel like we "value real art only" or something.

>>108821160
>If you could tell what art is you wouldn't care where it came from.
Kek. How do you figure that?

>>108821194
tl;dr and you don't know what art is refer to >>108821190

>>108821201
>tl;dr
its not that long, you're just retarded

>>108821168
>brown cattle seethes impotently

>>108821197
Art is either good or bad. Then you can argue about morality. If you’re presented with a masterwork and your answer is “it’s trash” then you don’t know what art is.
Morality and artistic quality are orthogonal to each other and only someone who doesn’t appreciate/understand art would conflate them

>>108821207
It’s too long because it’s just a retarded diarrhea of a post written by someone who got rightly called out on their bullshit
It’s defensively written, an insecurity driven wall of text

>>108821216
>Art is either good or bad.
And?

>If you’re presented with a masterwork and your answer is “it’s trash” then you don’t know what art is.
Why? You're just gonna keep reiterating your cattle opinions in a loop like some mindless drone, aren't you?

>Morality and artistic quality are orthogonal to each other
What does morality have to do with this?

>>108820643
What do you think double blind placebo control is retard? Oh my science

>>108821023

i was talking about the fact that people don't make the difference between ai monet and monet itself.

I can't too but i'm not going like "omg this is so different of monet because i want to think it is".
they showed a real monet saying it's ai and you've got people saying "but it's not like monet" they've been litterally fooled .
and probably a real "expert" on monet would have tacke a detail that he knows whats up because he studied it.

just like when i ask ai on history's questions about sources and he got it completly wrong kek i've got the knowledge so i can judge.
that's also why when guys says "yeah sloppy code" because they know how to optimise their codes because maybe they are some veterans who started with assembly in 70's i do accept that they know and i bow down to their expertise.
then people got bias etc but i hope you got my point. i don't even give a fuck about ai ,i just fucking vibecode apps in flutter because i've been tired of ads/subscriptions.

>>108821216
A poster of the mona lisa someone bought from temu for $1.50 - Trash

The real mona lisa - Not Trash.

the only difference is the origin. It's not like you're going to touch "the brush strokes" lmao stop being dumb

>>108821234
>i was talking about the fact that people don't make the difference between ai monet and monet itself.
That's not a fact, though.

>>108821240
No. Absolutely not. Youre again conflating two things because you don’t understand a thing. You wouldn’t say the brushstroke or the shading of the copy is bad like those retards on the OP were saying.
You wouldnt need to enjoy the AI Monet if it was truly AI made but if you knew about art you wouldnt be saying the brushstroke is bad

>>108821224
you're fucking retarded. you dont have any inner thoughts or conscience, as an NPC, and only react to stimuli. you only think its "defensively written and insecurity driven" because its just "very long" (according to you, because you're retarded, in reality all 4chan comments are short due to the character limit), so you thought "wow look at all he wrote to justify his bullshit!" and cant think beyond that

>>108821228
Morality is literally the only acceptable reason why you could say an AI Monet is bad
Not
>the painting is bad
But
>the way the painting was created is bad
The fact that people attack the result instead of the way it was produced (as evidenced by the replies) means they don’t even know what they’re angry about

>>108821155
>His handlers don't want you to be able to look at another human creation again without having ugly paranoid thoughts. No culture for the useless eaters.
/thread

>>108819498
Ignorance is a core part of the human experience, so exposing the ignorance of others is nothing noteworthy. Hopefully someone eventually pointed out the mistake that these people made (i.e. judging an authentic piece as if it was AI), so that they can learn from the experience and look at art more objectively.

>>108819502
I love the snail cat. He is me. Does anyone have the original full res image?

>>108821270
>Morality is literally the only acceptable reason why you could say an AI Monet is bad
AI slop is bad art because it's not even art. Not even belonging in the category is pretty as bad as you can get by the standards of fitness of that category. Nothing to do with morality.

>The fact that people attack the result instead of the way it was produced (as evidenced by the replies) means they don’t even know what they’re angry about
They know exactly what they're angry about: they're angry about being subjected to a counterfeit culture. It's just too bad they're not smart enough to realize that's been going on for a long, long time.

>>108821297
you don't know what art is

>>108821249

im not an english speaker and you're being annoying for the shake of being annoying ,please consider developping your thoughts and correct me so next time i'll use the right word for what i wanted to state.
that being said ,you're playing dumb because you're a terminally online retarded kid who only get basic social interaction through internet and since you're probably another vaccinated son of whore who have never read a book in it's life probably your only way to feel you're intelligent is to play dumb with people.You probably only talk english.

to make it short : okay attardé mental de fils de pute va bien niquer ta mère la grosse pute remplie de sperme de nègre.

why do i fucking browse those threads.!!!!!!!

>>108821250
You're too dumb to understand you fucking moron.

Here's a dumber example for you.

A vase you bought from the mall - $2, almost worthless trash

A shitty vase, objectively worse than the $2 one in every way, hand made by your 11 year old offspring. - Priceless. Absolutely priceless.

Origin and story matters in art. It's expression of the human experience, so OBVIOUSLY we value what the artist is trying to convey and express and where it's from. AI slop can look, aesthetically, as good or better than human drawn art, but the moment we know it's done by a soulless machine being prompted by a talentless moron, it loses all value.

A real monet has value because it was done by monet, a fake monet has no value because it wasn't by monet.

>>108821306
How do you know if any of these people can distinguish Monet from AI slop or not? They just got baited into trashing the pic and rambling about AI slop so that's what they did.

>>108821327
To be fair, many of those are probably bots themselves.

i'd even go so far as to think they're just false flag operations done by AI companies as marketing.

like "hurrr see people can't tell the difference, so pay for our model and make ur slop dreams come true"

>>108821327


because that's what they did.
if you got an expertise in your hands you can overcome your bias
if you know how to cut a tree or how to boxe or how to run or whatev
you fucking spot easily someone who don't even if you go like "huh no he's a real boxer/woodcutter etc"

eh just like if you know a language you spot someone who don't even if you say "no he's really fluent".

if you know you know.

>>108821336
Probably, but that's how normies act in general. You can skew their perceptions of anything just by framing it a certain way. Manipulating the subject to produce a response that conforms to a hypothesis doesn't confirm the hypothesis. It's called fraud.

>>108821344
The main thing to learn from your post is that you're a brown retard with no capacity for self-reflection.

File: whiterthanyoufuckingwhite(...).png (297 KB, 445x563)

297 KB PNG

>>108821372

be mad i'm whiter than you

>>108821402
You prove you're brown every time you post.

>>108821411

cool story shitskin please consider humble down when talking to white people ,god didn't make us all equal.

>>108821421
Even if it wasn't for your brown opinions, I could tell you're brown just by how desperate you are to deny it.

>>108821430

(you)

90% of the answers are not even commenting on the work and even having been deceived their argument stands

File: Sickos_Guy.jpg (17 KB, 144x244)

17 KB JPG

Now call him a tranny libtard and post an Indian meme

>>108820909
Do you just not have any money in the stock market or what? Most people's wealth is in their house and in the stock market, both of which will explode in value in an AGI world.

>>108820708
>Let's say your slop generator beats the astronomical odds and shits out a Monet-quality image.
your premise is flawed
AI image generator can output a thousand Monet-quality images per minute

>>108821681
Ok. Your psychotic delusions are completely tangential to my point, though.

>>108821696
You can't even tell the difference anymore. I can, but you can't. Not anymore.

>>108821700
Ok. Your psychotic delusions are completely tangential to my point, though.

>>108819498
Impressionism was shit so no wonder you can get away with claiming it's AI slop

>>108821708
You can't even tell the difference anymore. I can, but you can't. Not anymore.

>>108821763
Full-blown psychosis is causing you to mumble incongruently and argue against some voices in your head.

>>108819498
Most of those posts are right though, if not overly harsh. People forget that art was going to shit for decades before AI came on the scene.

>>108819502
Snailcat a cute

>>108820909
You could already do the one the left if you just became an artist, which is becoming harder due to AI.
People go into soulsucking jobs like coding and try to fix problems that don't exist to feel like they are contributing something to society and not just making Sheckelberg richer.

>>108821669
The stock market is even more lopsided than the monetary supply, it's majority owned by a small group of insiders. What's best for me is not what's best for stock holders.

>>108821845
"Artist" is not a job. "Professional illustrator" is a job and it's every bit as soul-sucking as any other job if you have any genuine artistic sense.

>>108820922
While it is true that jobs as a rigid occupation you are forced to dedicate most of your day to are very anti-natural for humans, the reason we have invented so much shit after agriculture spawned that version of jobs is that it forces everyone into specializing much more than they would otherwise, and people will never be willing to sacrifice that factor.

>>108821887
>the reason we have invented so much shit after agriculture spawned that version of jobs is that it forces everyone into specializing much more than they would otherwise, and people will never be willing to sacrifice that factor.
That's my point. That's why I don't believe the "elites" are doing anything wrong making you progressively poorer, nor will they be doing anything wrong exterminating you outright.

>>108821194
>if you go to a museum, they wont have AI art
That's true now, but in 100 years? How about 1000 years?
There are studies predicting that only 5% of current day physical artworks will survive the next 100 years. Enough actual human art has to keep being made and preserved to offset that culling rate if we want human art museums to keep being a thing, and AI taking over the comercial art side and creating further distractions for people is not going to help increase that.
Hell, the art we have nowadays is basically just a rounding error compared to all the art that has been lost. Paleolithic and neolithic humans seem to have loved painting as it was one of the few forms of entertainment they had yet all we have left of them are a handful of cave paintings. The greatest painter to have ever existed could have lived during that era and we will never know because nome of their work was preserved.
The romans were huge into painting sculptures and we didn't even know until recent modern chemical scans showed that basically all the sculptures we thought were bare marble and granite were actually painted.
All future art historians will have of our era will be an endless sea of AI art slop and all they will find once they dig deep into it will be shitty sonic and FNAF drawings kids made before they had to get a job to serve our oligarchs and lost all creativity, and niche furry comissions.
And AI is just the final nail in the coffin. Humanity already creates way less art than it should for the current global population numbers because of the system being as hostile as fuck to art as a way to earn a living and very few people doing it as a hobby because tons of other forms of entertainment are way easier.
I don't know about other things, but we might truly be at the end of history when it comes to human art. It's looking very grim.

File: IMG_2255.jpg (52 KB, 736x736)

52 KB JPG

>>108821795
>>108821284
This is you, luddite

>Caring about what a useless NFT huckster is posting for elonbux on Xitter

>>108822068
>Paleolithic and neolithic humans seem to have loved painting as it was one of the few forms of entertainment they had yet all we have left of them are a handful of cave paintings.
Hmm. And I'm sure they worried much about all the past art lost to time. And what art of theirs historians will find in 10,000 years. And the paltry artistic output of the global caveman population. Those were some truly dark times for humanity and art.

>>108821902
I would have agreed with you 100 years ago, as making sure the elites hold their end of the social contract by enacting superior violence is the people's duty and basically the whole reason why the social contract exists.
The thing is that the elites have become so powerful beyond imagination due to technology and modern psychology research enabling basically brainwashing on a global scale, that they can break the social contract with impunity and there's not much the masses can do anymore.
It got infinitely worse in the past 30 years because demographics have gone to shit to an extent that the older half of the population are fofcing the younger half into tolerating the death of the social contract in hopes that they will be able to retire and die before the world they have known implodes.
Game theory only works if both sides can hit back when the other side plays unoptimally.
Eventually, things will collapse and the elites will get bitten in the ass luke during every major collapse, but at that point
Really, the dame way that 4 year terms lead politicians to make bad long term decisions, the healthy adult period of humans lasting only around 40 years does as well. 40 years is fucking nothing.

>>108822148
I don't think you get what I'm trying to say. I think all civilized cattle inherently deserves what's coming. You should have read the ToS for civilization, the technological system, the consumer economy etc. before you signed up.

>>108822107
Early settled cultures cared that their religious art was preserved and we also have nearly nothing left.
And I didn't even mention writing which is by far the form or expression we have lost the most on. Ovid's Medea is supposed to have been one of the greatest plays written during the roman empire and we only know it existed from other authors mentioning it in their works. Even for the Bible, which is one of the most preserved and widespread books ever and relatively recent, the oldest complete text we have is from 200 years after it was written and there's debates to this day about how close it is to the actual original text.
And it's not like we care much about preserving art either. Our preservation efforts are entirely focused on basically just 0.1% of art that we have deemed of significance from our current POV.

>>108822244
Do you think your weird obsession with art-as-commodity has some kind of relation to the cultural degenerate that ends with """AI art"""?

>>108822283
degeneration*

>>108819502
And yet, AI would refuse to generate such an image for "transphobic hate speech". Sad! Luddites win once again.

>>108819498
AI can't paint a SS Goku serving tacos on your wall. But this snailcat can and will

>>108820098
AI art doesn't "have" to stink, these days there's models that can generate images of as good as the best human artists. There's also shittier models that can only make hideous slop but that is also true of human artists

>>108822523
>AI art doesn't "have" to stink
AI "art" doesn't exist.

>here's models that can generate images of as good as the best human artists.
Psychotic delusion.

>>108821845
>You can already do the left
Turns out you can just do whatever the fuck you want actually if your rich. Crazy.

People work soul sucking jobs because there's not enough room at the top, and people will kill to be on top.

File: Screenshot 2026-05-14 at (...).png (102 KB, 1148x390)

102 KB PNG

>>108820578
if making anti AI posts generates engagement some jeet will make an account all about being anti AI for Xitter bucks. Anything that can be monetized will be
>>108820587
wrong

>AItards desperately coping with being the true niggers of the internet

Online artists are a bigger threat to themselves than diffusion models. This is just another proof of that, and how you could do a false flag to make them devour some artist alive since they're just that deranged.

>>108822545
The very first reply in his screenshot is blatantly AI generated.

>>108822558
Anti-AI psychosis induced by AI Derangement Syndrome (AIDS)

>>108822635
>Anti-AI psychosis induced by AI Derangement Syndrome (AIDS)
Imagine getting mad about things that objectively don't exist.

>>108820592
every time i get some generic shit with no vocals recommended to me i check to see if the "artist" has either one album or over 9000 released exclusively post-2023 and block them thoughbeit

is there a meme for ai centrists? im very ambivalent regarding ai

>>108819498
I refuse to believe any of those people are real. Only bots talk like they do.

>hourly aijeet troll thread

>>108822689
Aren't anti-AI Luddites constantly mad about artists they claim don't exist?

"This isn't art and you're not an artist"

>>108822790
Get your T levels checked

>>108820728
the point kys retard

>>108822790
It's called not being a fucking retard. I imagine you see the practical use of it, see it just as a tool, but likely have some concerns around society's "moral direction" in regards to it.

The two sides of the spectrum outside of that are:
>1. AI hating is my entire fucking personality, I continue to move the goal posts on what is "good enough" and continue to nitpick every single little detail of every output
>2. Claude helped me make a website and now I think it's conscious and I have seen a digital god

Sadly AI is actually used by almost every non traditional working artists on the planet, even the ones that pretend not to use it or ones who are actively against it.
Not only that, but some companies straight up force people to integrate it in their pipeline.

>>108819498
those comments are probably all AI so who cares

>>108824930
this cope was written by AI

>>108824935
it wasnt but it easily could have been

>>108819498
how the fuck did none of them recognise waterlillies it's one of monetst most famous paintings...hey are all thick as dried shit

>>108819498
this thread is so 3 years ago there's a reason sora got shut down there's no value in AI art especially art that isn't even made by humans it's an oxymoron we're trying to automate the highest paying white collar professions i.e. coding now

>>108820799
God, thirdies are kvetching after all.

>>108820745
Neither with your attitude, grandmas

>>108820819
Then tell to stonetoss to how to build a bunker.

>>108820827
>we
speak it for yourself thirdie, and thirdies won't progress, only pretends.

>>108820957
the staff can ban you instead.

>>108819498
I really enjoy seeing them seethe, these retards really believe human art have "soul" but they somehow they all fail miserably at detecting it...
good fucking riddance, art is an hobby and should stay as one, we'll use computers to make movies and shit instead and these faggot artists will have to find a real job

>>108822463
Libtards never wins, only constantly loses.
>>108822635
>>108824674
the libtards only pretends and screech like pigs because USAIDS

>>108821008
>>108820998
you lost, grandmas btw

>>108825087
>>108821069
>>108822534
>>108822550
>>108825091
>>108825115
You will be replaced and you will die of hunger on some random street
Cope

File: 1777867286116.gif (70 KB, 350x466)

70 KB GIF

>>108822080
And this you, libtard.
>but Dammit I was planning to create a meme using that handheld radar but showing a snailcat instead, you ruined it,
not arguing with grandmas like you

>>108825166
Your boss fired you, thus your country will be nuked by billionaires
Arrest

>>108819498
at least half of those comments are AI. the OP gives the LLM a perfect point to generate a reply from.

>>108825190
Obsessed and Luddite
>>108825196
Im billionaire, cope, trans

File: Fuck AI.jpg (3.11 MB, 5464x2491)

3.11 MB JPG

>>108819498

>>108825204
Rent free libtard
>>108825204
You're a poorfag and a liar too, arrest, grandmas.

>>108825233
Im the CEO of Bosnia, retard. Keep your mouth shout please

>>108825246
you're CEO of the cringe department, i don't take orders from newfags like you.