[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


GODDAMMIT WHY IS HDMI 2.1 PASSTHROUGH ADOPTION SO FUCKING HARD TO COME BY?

Granted my agitation with this is born more from a mix of the sound bar market's weak adoption of HDMI 2.1 passthrough and Sony using an HDMI encoding chip that only supports two HDMI 2.1 ports out of a possible four, unlike every TV on the market, but still...
>>
>>108828518
so stop spending peanuts on equipment and buy the shit that does the job, retard.
>>
File: 1778813944795.jpg (39 KB, 895x259)
39 KB JPG
>>
>>108828701
How does that help? I need a sound bar that supports eARC and CEC but also sends through any HDMI plugged into it with the full contingent of HDMI 2.1 features (VRR, ALLM, 120 Hz 4K, etc.).
>>
>>108828518
Because processing that much bandwidth takes a lot of compute - which is expensive.
>>
>>108830308
Why does it need processing power to pass the light through? An HDMI cable is already doing that for free.
>>
>>108828518
>sound bar
lol
buy real speakers
>>
>I need literal garbage because I'm too proud to connect RCA audio or a 3.5mm to a proper amp + speaker combo



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.