How does it compare to RHEL/Fedora or Debian/Ubuntu? Tumbleweed looks like a nicer Arch, and integration with Btrfs/Snapper is top notch. There’s also a stable release Leap which offers two years of support. What’s not to like?
>>108835416Openclaw and vllm runs best on ubuntu
Ironically they dropped the chameleon.
>>108835416>What’s not to like?PatternsRichard Brown
>>108835416I used tumbleweed for a while and really liked it as a relatively minimal rolling distro. It is a little annoying dealing with media codecs and such, but I liked the OBS compared to compiling on my computer with AUR.That said, two things had me switching to arch (cachyos) last year. ROCm support for Blender cycles/LLM stuff was very flaky, even with them adding it to factory repos. They deprecated Yast which is a great admin tool, but the replacement for it had none of the basic functionality I used (firewall control, disk management) and Leap installations dropped Yast.
>>108836054>PatternsVery true. Updates reinstalling software I had intentionally uninstalled because of this was very annoying.
>>108835416i'd like to use Tumbleweed because their stability is top notch but they haven't ditched YaST there yet, only on Leap. Maybe when the next Leap arrives i'll install it, but their Gnome version is missing some features i like
>>108835416unlike Fagdora, they haven't banned potential inclusion of XLibre yet. so, still better than that and you can currently just compile it yourself if you use a DE other than GNOME and KDE.
I daily tumbleweed for 7 years now.
>>108835416I like it and have no desire to switch. CachyOS sounds interesting since they make gaming optimizations but I haven't seen a chart where a different distro with a modern kernel would be noticeably slower. Tumbleweed stays so up to date that it's already 99% there anyway. Also it's easy to use and supports KDE very well.
>>108836799Even better than Fedora? My concern is that if they go too fast, there will be more opportunities for Krashes.
>>108838514openSUSE is tested before developing an update so yeah, stable like Fedora, definitely more stable than arch. You have automatic rollback anyway just in case.The only problem is YaST. They should just kill it like that did in Leap.
>>108836054>Richard BrownIs that the Rotten Flesh guy?
>>108838699arch is tested and only ships stable releases of packages, tell me exactly how opensuse is better than that
>>108835416>clearly a shill thread in title>then tries to justify his reasoning while also asking for supportI don't get these threads. Just ask if you should use it next time instead of pretending it's the best while also not being confident in yourself.
>>108838970yeah
>>108839209SUSE automatically test like 100 times before deploying
>>108839287That’s the open suse tagline you mouth breather. >I don't get these threads. I can imagine you don’t get a lot of things.
>>108839209arch isn't tested an on top requires you to read their news before every update because it just can't do some updates automatically
>arch isnt tested why do retards spew lies that are so easily refuted?
>>108835416I see no point in (Open)SUSE unless you're a German nationalist.
>>108841839More like that I'm not an american nationalist.
