>we can always identify AI SLOP
>>108836856AI chads claim another victim.
>>108836856Neo-ludittism is completely fear based there is no logic, these people are unreasonable they lost everything but their ability to invent copes.
>>108836856So if I'd spit in a delicious dish and you couldn't tell while eating - that would be okay, right?
>>108836900more like someone hands you an amazing dish and you claim you found spit in it because you watched too many tiktoks about spit in food
>>108836856Monet is human slop
AI-art is inherently worth less than human made art,but it's funny to see everyone indirectly admit that many of the works of famous painters don't hold up without the hype surrounding the artist.I scrolled through this list:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_Lilies_(Monet_series)and couldn't find the one the supposed original that was supposedly posted by that AI-shill.But at the same time, many of them don't seem that impressive or nice, even if some are goodlike pic-rel s a great painting but many are barely decipherable blobs of color, somewhat like the maybe-AI, maybe-monet-original blobs of color that the shill on X posted.
>>108836856a digital JPG image of a Monet isnt a real Monet, you stupid fuck.
>>108837504kill yourself today
>make an "automated" account>is actually just a posting proxy>post actual art of some Xitter artfag>claim you've AI generated it>have a flood of mongoloids sending death threats to (You)Online artists are a bigger threat to themselves than AI. Zero thoughts, only emotions and animalistic rage.
>>108836856So in other words, society at large is going to hate you and your "art" no matter what your slop generator produces. Enjoy your "win".
>>108836984https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Claude_Monet_Nymph%C3%A9as_Seerosen_1915_Neue_Pinakothek_Munich_M%C3%BCnchen.JPGit's this one
>>108836984>AI-art is inherently worth less than human made art,There is no such thing as "AI art".>but it's funny to see everyone indirectly admit that many of the works of famous painters don't hold up without the hype surrounding the artist.No, it only shows that even people who know fuck-all about the finer points of painting at least have the common sense to reject the falsification of human culture.
>>108837667>>There is no such thing as "AI art".Art stands for Artificial Something Artificial can make Artificial things.
>mfw we're the ones failing the turing test now
>>108837739I consider twitter artists to be more like the humans failing the bear proof garbage disposal than an average
How can """AI""" recreate Monet's art if it can't even tell real Monet from fake Monet? Proompters BTFO.
>>108837614They already hated us beforehand, so that is neither here nor there.
>>108838388You should use the shatbot to do reading comprehension and write a response for you because that was absolutely retarded.
>>108836856HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>108836856Any responses after the ruse was revealed? How many jimmies were rustled and how rustled were those jimmies?
