How come $50 IEMs still sound so much better than all the high end wireless earbuds?I love the comfort of wireless especially when working out but so far I'm always displeased with them everytime I use my wired in-ears.
They don't. You made that up.
>>108843987This has tested multiple times. Even audiophiles never hear anything better than 128kbps audio and they have no fucking clue what quality the headphones/earbuds they are using. Only difference is that people with best hearing, can hear the background noise. Still, I will never be stuck in one place with a wire. I want to walk around and still hear the audio. 20-100 hour battery life and the fact that I just put my headphones to a charger before going to bed, I will never have to worry about charging or hear that "battery low" message.
>>108844043but I tested it myself
>>108844043/thread
>>108843987mhmm....booba....
>>108843987that's a man.it has a dick
>>108843987i prefer the audio on my earfun air pro 4+'s to my simgot supermix 4s, personally. that said the supermix 4s (and other IEMs I own) are a lot more comfortable in my ear and sit flatter, which is nice when you're listening to music in bed and want to lay on your side
>>108843987wireless earbuds are dogshitthat makes senseI get real mad at those losers who claim their $10 IEM has some magic tuning that makes it comparable to anything $100 if not $500 or morefucking POORS and their COPING
>>108844169tested on your geriatric neighbours by a deaf and blind mantest it on deez nuts bitch I can easily tell the difference between YouTube tier audio and losslessmust suck to have such deficiencies baked into your very being. Sad!
>>108843987a thread died for this
