There's a new trend where people online are saying things like "LLMs aren't intelligent" or sarcastically saying "AGI anyway now!" in response to random AI related posts, and smugly acting like they're some wise sage or prophet whose superior to everyone else.Yeah we get it, AI is overhyped and retard consumers think AI is more than it actually is. Congratulations, you are so smart.This reminds me of what Redditors were in the fedora atheist days before it was taken over completely by drooling hyper retards.What causes this smug AI Reddit scientism, and why do I have a sneaking suspicion this board is full of these types of faggots?
>>108847243LLMs aren't intelligent.
>>108847244Thank you dr. RedditYour Mensa certificate is in the mail
>>108847243It is a direct response to AI evangelists that think we made a digital god that never make mistakes.
>>108847251The best way to spite me would be to agree in your next post that LLMs are not intelligent. That would dilute my take's exclusivity and prestige.
>>108847243Doesn't this describe most online discourse about any topic?
>>108847268Already agreed with that take in the OP retard>>108847255How is this different from vegans telling everyone at ever opportunity that they didn't "fall for the lies of the meat industry"No one cares faggot
>>108847290So you agree that LLMs are not intelligent.
>>108847298Not OP but I don't agree with this. I pasted this thread into Claude and it confirmed that OP agreed with that statement in OP.So apparently LLMs are more intelligent than you are.
>>108847309>Not OPDidn't ask.
>>108847244>AI isn't intelligent because...because it just isnt okay??>le n-next token predictor bro!
>>108847319Whom are you quoting? Why are you losing your mind with rage over simple facts?
>>108847329Can you prove it's not intelligent?
>>108847360Yes.
>>108847363
it depends on the perspective. If you're a soulless jeet subhuman, LLMs look like god to you since it is much better than you (barely sentient organism). If you're a white man with high iq, they look stupid.
>>108847278Here's fifteen reasons why Trump raped kids and you'll never convince me otherwise... One: his brother was in Hillel. Two: he blew Bubba. Three: vats of acid for dissolving brothel babies. Four: he groomed a six year old...
>>108847243People created a new mental illness for themselves over their anthropomorphic obsession with an auto complete and are using it to deprive people of electricity and water, all on your dime. Maybe you should be more annoyed with them than the people who explain what ais actually are.
LLMs are good for software dev. kind of shit for everything else. that's not intelligence. i'm not sure what you call that other than "sometimes useful".
>>108847402>deprive people of electricity and water,Is this what CNN told you to believe?
>>108847410Zion Don rapes kids.
>>108847290the meat industry isn't actually making retarded threads on /an/that behavior is squarely in the wheelhouse of vegansi much more rarely see some faggot post "you should eat meat yum yum" to rile up the veganfags and i wouldn't have reason to assume that poster is paid to do sothe AItards are making retarded threads on /g/
>>108847407>t. Fedora tipping AI rationalist skeptic
>>108847410Cnn is too busy cancelling themselves because of two scoops man to report on any of the damage caused by deified autocompletes.
>>108847413You should use AI it's smart and fun fun
>>108847420CNN has gaslit half the population into believing that AI datacenters are deleting water from the planet
>>108847416>labelscall me whatever you want. that's just the reality of the situation. it's not my fault people are offended by the truth.
>>108847433>mentally ill jeet doesn't understand the bare basics of reality
>>108847433Water isn't deleted from the planet, it's just not going to go to goycattle anymore. That includes you
>>108847416>My AI girlfriend is real Claudia told me so!
AI bros of today are the original reddit scientism crowd lol, funny how you shills try to turn that on other side
>>108847243Chill, I just hate Jews and notice patterns. I wouldn't mind the tech itself if it was being created by the Third Reich.
>>108847243Have you considered that you might be a blithering fucking idiot who falls for every scam he comes across?
>>108847376Stupid is an understatement. It looks like a digital lying Jew.
>>108847290Are you trying to get people to shame other people for being skeptic and resistant against AI? I'm sure there's a way to do it but it's not this.
>>108847243They're just the type of person who fills in the space you see in every community where the same mainstream opinions get repeated in every discussion and nothing interesting or insightful is said. People who talk for the sake of talking.
>>108847410Should I believe RT instead, you fifth columnist whore? Have you considered how easy it would be to just kill yourself?
>>108847455No, most of it ends up in the ocean.
>>108847455I have plenty of water. You're a retard if you forgot how to operate your taps after you heard a data center was being built in your state
>>108847243the real division os between those that have offline lans and offline local LLMs and those that do not.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bw9NS1ZH1C8
>>108847630>Should I believe RT instead, you fifth columnist whore?based
>>108847402>using it to deprive people of electricity and waterdepending on who those people are...I'm ok with that. Looking at you again India.
>In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face is that, in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is probably more meaningful than our criticism designating it so.
how (You) describe AI as a human?i think it appear different for different people
>>108847243>it's another "tech board somehow doesn't grasp functionalism" thread
>>108848148it smarter than 95% current population
>>108847360Well, I can definitely see that you aren't very intelligent. Because an intelligent person uses proofs to prove that something IS and not that something is NOT. In other words, you made a claim - you have to prove it.
If you weren't a difficult person to deal with, AI evangelists wouldn't exist.Every time you expected someone to wade through hundreds of pages of legal text for one specific scenario, every time you told someone to not necro a thread, every time you witheld the solution to a problem from someone for no other reason than making yourself feel superior and went out of your way to make them feel stupid too, you assisted the birth of LLMs.If you want to seethe at someone, seethe at yourself for being an insufferable faggot.
>>108847244the "I" in LLM stands for Intelligent
>>108847243>What causes this smug AI Reddit scientism?The fact that boomers, children, midwits and whatnot are actually developing ai psychosis and thinking that chatgtp is sentient, not to mention jeet clickbait channels and even the guys who develop LLMs themselves are constantly subtly pointing at this as clickbait and to hype up AIPeople need to understand what LLMs are, I think at this point there should be a mandatory course in schools that teaches people why a chatbot isn't truly sentient and why it should never be more treated as more than a tool
>>108849335Sounds like you're mad about computer software
id rather talk to an llm than you stupid niggers
LLM's aren't even the only form of machine learning models, but because the entire discourse and the industry grift is focused solely on them, it undermines the potential of more specialized architectures for different tasks.It's funny that when you're someone that's genuinely interested in the technology, you hate just about everyone because everyone is fucking retarded and makes it impossible to talk about it. The corposcum hoarding all the hardware to price everyone out of the business and evangelists keep pumping the idea that we've created a computer god because it can convincingly "say" certain things or it's really good at finding specific patterns, like Mythos finding security issues in software code, and the anti-AI lunatics shit up the entire web sperging out that we've literally created Skynet or HAL 9000 or put another sci-fi AI here since they're all dimwitted millennials that need pop culture from the 80's and 90's to be able to have any sort of relation to the real world. The people who actually give a shit about the research and development are few and far in-between.
>>108849728I understand your frustrations but "AI" just isn't intelligent. :^)
>>108849728This post was too long and seems to immediately veer off into delusional self pity, so I stopped reading it almost right away. Just fyi
>>108849749You didn't understood the word of what I've said if you think you're doing some epic rage bait.>>108849779Yes I keep making the same mistake on running off on topics that needs some intelligence on a board infested to the brim with the most tech illiterate retards the planet has seen.
>>108849786If you could change one thing about the world right now what would it be?
>>108847243The tpot rationalists (whether AI dicksucker or not) are all unemployed. This is the big secret. When not attending a birthday gangbang or cult meetup-camp, they spend their time pontificating about AI on Xitter.
>>108849820Nuke USA, Israel and India.
>>108849826I'm employed and I harass people on twitter daily if I suspect they are brown or trans. AI has nothing to do with it
>>108849820Have the biggest investors wake up and realize companies like Anthropic are unprofitable as the R&D costs are so big they'll never have a business model where they'll make all that money back, pull out their stocks, and initiate the bubble pop. It's inevitable, but the earlier we go through the whole market crash song and dance the better. After that the hardware prices will crash, there'll be plenty of affordable machine learning hardware on the second hand market from all the liquidated startups, and we'll enter a proper renaissance of the technology now that more researchers will have an easier time developing open weight models and we'll have an easier time running them locally.
>>108849844>brown or transGiven the original "tpot" aka "ingroup" was full of trannies, you're obviously not one of the "tpot rationalists" I talk about.
