>>108849224
You could count all the women in the world who care if the dating app they use is open source or not on one hand

>>108849236
And all of them have a penis

use case for dating apps?

>>108849224
>open source
Nothing dries pussy up faster than freedom.

>>108849224
whats the point dating apps only become popular via spending millions in marketing

>>108849224
Women are fucking disgusting.

>>108849224
Right is cuter.

go vibecode an opensource dildo to fuck yourself in the ass with

>>108849224
Coding has never been the barrier for dating apps. Getting users (women especially) is always the challenge. OKcupid hooked millennial girls with meme personality tests (Congratulations you are a strawberry! Btw here are some men we think will be compatible with strawberries like you, click to learn more).

>>108849224
there should be a dating app that is favouring men, not like how all these dating apps now favouring women, so it should be like
>virgin, or body count
>weight and body type
>debt
>how many tattoos
>do you have a dad
>ever licked an ass (you don't want to kiss a girl was rimming some filthy ass don't you!?)
and other stuff

>>108849224
they have retard

>>108850194
why would any woman in her right mind join that? serious question. what's in it for her?

>>108850204
high quality men, not the trash she sleeps with?
>b bbut it's all about fuun and girls just wanna have fuuun
ok you will die alone, no self respecting man will be with you after your hoe phase, let alone you won't even bond anyway

>>108850216
lol
for a group that supposedly worships the free market, you people sure don't seem to understand it
if there were market demand for that app, it would already exist. clearly women aren't struggling to find men like this

>>108850241
they are not struggling to have sex, they are struggling to have a relationship, morons like you can't differentiate between both and think just because a woman control sex so everything is favouring and on her side
the thing is, they sleep around and keep jumping on dicks hoping one day they will find mr right, but they never do because the more they sleep the lower the chance is, so it's like drugs, it only gets worse to them

>>108849224
i thought that stuff was captured by match group and they hold that monopoly with deepstate resolve

>>108850260
maybe you've just not paid attention, but women get to eat their cake and have it, too. they will sleep around for X number of years before deciding to settle down with some schmuck, getting married, and having kids. maybe they'll even divorce rape him. i'm not supporting it. i'm saying that it would be insane for a rational actor (>inb4 >women >rational) to throw away this arrangement for no reason. they have no incentive to change, so why would they? your pathetic power fantasy where le heckin trad man gets one over on all the icky whores is more cringeworthy than a triple digit bodycount could ever manage to be

>>108850260
Huh faggot, it's like complaining to jobless guys that you're not finding the perfect job among the billions of opportunities you're getting. Kill yourself for making me reply to your obvious bait.

>>108850288
maybe old generations, but even boomers weren't that sluts as today, and were at least thin with no tattoos, not a single man is willing to wife a fat used-good full of tattoo girl, none. They might fuck them, but never wife. your example is about old gen having whatever cake, I am talking about the new one, they are crying to get in a relationship, and the ones who eventually get they remain in situationship for years and never officially married. you are not paying attention, but the young gen (z and millennial) see marriage as a burden to start with, no add that fat slut tattoo combo and there's ZERO chance for them to get married
>>108850294
>muh job muh market
your wife isn't a job, go be a cuck and kiss a girl that was rimming some ass few months ago and full of std

>>108850194
Any such app will be full of literal lying giga gold diggers. You're delusional.

>>108850325
>there's ZERO chance for them to get married
whatever you have to tell yourself lol

>>108849224
Huge downgrade. Why are tradcucks like this?

>>108850194
Then no woman would use it.
The fundamental imbalance is that men have a much higher sex drive than women.
Women want men just because of company so they are not lonely, as a support unit when they have a breakdown, or as a source of money if they are gold diggers.

>dating apps
>gambling apps
>food delivery apps
>porn apps

all of them sinful and debilitating to society in general, so that is a good thing.

>>108850501
>lol at the end
found the millennial cuck, who married a ran over roastie because tehe he can't stay alone and need babies that will resemble all her exes, the only two kind of people that push that shit are either roasties so they don't die alone with their doggos or weak men who accepted to be a cuck
>>108850526
women need men more than the other way around, women follow the social norm, you enforce it, they follow it, it's how it works. If enough men stopped (which seems the case) to see them as wifey material, they will have to change, the whole no women will use them is stupid because women when they get older and feel the pressure they literally pay for dating services, and in this economy, young women will be more desperate to find someone for shelter

>>108850693
Yes, when they are older they pay for dating, but they do that because they are not attractive anymore. So what is the point of dating them?

I hate thinking about how much time and money is wasted on make up every single day by the majority of women.
1/3rd of their life is spent trying to trick people.

they did, it was called Tea. It was a huge thing in the news.

>>108850194
>>108850204
There is one, it's called Bumble. It's pretty popular.

>>108849224
right > left

>>108849224
left > right

>>108849224
right is unironically better

>>108849224
/soc/ did:
>>>/soc/34983172

https://github.com/duolicious/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duolicious

duolicious existed before vibe coding

>>108850748
tea's not open source, retard

>>108850763
>>108850812
>>108849452
they aint ready to hear this

>>108850833
>tea's not open source, retard
oh. ok. i thought it was. carry on then

>>108850526
>men have a much higher sex drive than women.
kek no

>>108850761
Bumble is just tinder but women message first.
>>108850385
Verification is indeed a problem but just the implication will filter out a lot of them

>>108850260
This. They are miserable. The situationship girls are the female equivalent of incel (Have sex, but nothing more). Then there is actually a good amount of celibate girls, not because they can't have sex but they just like the other girls only want 9-10/10s but aren't approached by any.

>>108850288
First off, they see it as settling. Like really really a downgrade from their expectations to get with a 5-8/10 and serve him well, long enough to have kid(s) and marriage.

But increasingly they're not getting that either as the jig is up and most men know how it works now. They'll just be situationships of the losers now.

>>108851127
They do. Porn and dating apps proves it.

>>108849224
The most superior dating app already exists in telegram.

looks better as a human

>>108850325
What makes you think women would chose marriage over casual sex?

>your wife isn't a job, go be a cuck and kiss a girl that was rimming some ass few months ago and full of std
By your definition anyone who has casual sex is a cuck. Aren't you sure you aren't upset because you can't have it?

>>108851236
>>108851127
Let's not be retarded with "it's not!" yes men have a higher sex drive. Women can be just as horny. If you ever spent a day in a hotel room with a new girl that really likes you, you will know this, she'll want to do it 5+ times.

The big difference is in willingness to have sex, for men it's much higher, this is of course genetic since women will be the one carrying a child in nature if the man runs away.
>Porn
True, men are much more visual in attraction. Women like stories. Recently there was a sex novel about a literal cow with a big cow cock that was also a CEO that went to a "milking farm" that the protagonist girl was a maid at. Or you can look at 50 shades of grey. A lot of women are degenerate coomers.

>>108851326
The thing that I am talking about is that women are capable of being super picky and not having sex for months, years. Men on the other hand if they can't get a gf they like, they will lower their standard. Women will not.

>>108851325
>What makes you think women would chose marriage over casual sex?
Women don't want casual sex like men do. They have a much higher need of commitment, simping, financial support and someone to be a dad for her kids, which she also has a much larger desire for. For her, the sex is more a entry point.

>By your definition anyone who has casual sex is a cuck.
No? Just don't kiss. The one time I gave in to a hoe I was fucking that really wanted to kiss, I got a cough.

>>108849452
>>108850763
>>108850812
wow such hot takes your text just permanently burned into my oled

File: 1764710619529997.jpg (12 KB, 241x309)

12 KB JPG

>>108851421
>Women don't want casual sex like men do.
peak incel take

>>108851409
Yeah I know.
>women are capable of being super picky and not having sex for months, years.
That's increasingly true for men too.
>Men on the other hand if they can't get a gf they like, they will lower their standard. Women will not.
At 18-30ish yeah. Because they are being heavily conditioned that they deserve and can get better. When it's getting late for them, they do. Men of course are a lot more rational throughout.

Problem would be handling the database with user data. How do you make it all open source without having blackhats find and exploit vulnerabilities.

Unless there is some smart peer-to-peer way of doing it without a central db.

>>108851409
>Men on the other hand if they can't get a gf they like, they will lower their standard.
If only it was a matter of needing lower standards.

>>108851460
That's a fact. Imagine if 80% of men could have sex with the top 20% of women a few times a week, no effort required, no pregnancy trap risk, no accusation risk... That's the situation women are in right now, but if genders were reversed, there would 5-10x more sex happening.

>>108851548
Yeah it does suck for the bottom 50% of men, but you can do a bit of low hanging fruit improvements and then go to south east asia.

>>108851506
Do you think OSS is less secure than proprietary on average? You'll have others vetting and suggesting improvements. But security is not even that hard.

File: Screenshot_20260518-101836.png (254 KB, 1080x1513)

254 KB PNG

>>108849224
Because dating apps require critical mass to become popular and the major player owns literally every single dating app on the market. They'd crush you with astroturfed criticism and bot accounts to ruin you before you even began.

>>108849224
Right looks fine, and I bet she's a whole lot easier to deal with than when she was in that left photo phase.

>>108849224
that's an improvement tho?

>>108849224
Because the money is in keeping the algorithm secret. That’s how you make dudes pay for tiny boosts in visibility.

>>108851566
If you're a long-term NEETs / semi-hikki, perhaps well into your 30s due to life fuck-ups, realistically speaking you aren't going to go anywhere. Even if you're not a slob, not fat and decently groomed, your sorry mental state will come through immediately. And good luck explaining how you got like there in the first place. Changes are this is a significant portion of the /g/ userbase too.

>>108851421
Then why do they have it instead of waiting for a man who's serious about having a relationship?
Do you think they all do it with the hope that the man will stay with them?

>>108851662
Yeah of course it's hard to be at the bottom. but:
>Even if you're not a slob, not fat and decently groomed, your sorry mental state will come through immediately.
Eh yes and no. Women do tend to fall for men that are in bad mental states, you "just" need to switch from naive simpy looking for love loser to "not caring" loser. Not caring is really a 2-4 point boost in young womens minds, because they can't distinguish between actual status and just not caring.

But being NEET is such a sad thing to be that I'd advice everyone to get a job.

>>108851674
>Then why do they have it instead of waiting for a man who's serious about having a relationship?
They are told there is no downside to doing that (Both for them, and judgement from future mates). And it still has some non-zero chance of hooking him.
>Do you think they all do it with the hope that the man will stay with them?
Most, more or less instinctively. And increasingly more as they age up.

File: bjarne1.jpg (48 KB, 473x505)

48 KB JPG

>>108849224
You will never ascend to a graybeard wizard if you pursue thottery. Stay off of social media, teach yourself something new, be better. You can do it, faggot.

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1779123723697534.webm

File: BN-EI841_schwab_GR_201409(...).jpg (162 KB, 1242x810)

162 KB JPG

>>108851795
>But being NEET is such a sad thing to be that I'd advice everyone to get a job.

>>108849224
Who the fuck tuck the shirt inside the pants in home?
Anyway the face is still alright.

>>108849224
Don't think anyone in this has has mentioned this but right looks better.

>>108850194
That's not how a dating app should favor men. Women will just lie. Obviously such a site would be great, if it could exist, but it can't. It will always be the man's responsibility to filter out worthless whores and used-up sluts using the relevant context clues.

The way dating apps should favor men is by designing in such a way as to make the men on the site appear as desirable and attractive as possible to the women. In real life, women judge men on a variety of social metrics. But on a dating app, the only real things she can judge (beyond appearance) are "skill at creating an online dating profile" which counts for nothing and "skill at text messaging" which counts for very little.

>>108851127
Massive oversimplification.
Male sex drive is more consistent, immediate, broad and physical.
Female sex drive is more cyclic*, hypergamous and emotional.

*birth control pills fuck with female sex drive, also.

>>108849224
Jewed.com

File: sarkeesian-fake-wedding.jpg (134 KB, 1003x1024)

134 KB JPG

>>108851159
>The situationship girls are the female equivalent of incel (Have sex, but nothing more).
A great term was coined for this: Insol
(involuntarily solitary, involuntary solitude).
Lonely girl who may or may not have uncommitted sex, but has no worthy male companion.
Unfortunately it never caught on.

both the woman on the left and on the right are ugly
don't @ me

>>108849224
do moids really think that women are all made up all the time at home

>>108852867
do foids really think filters look good?

>>108849224
the problem with dating apps is human sexual dynamics. today we have more excess men than ever before, women are both more hypergamic yet more selective than ever before and even then for dating apps to work well as intended by men (equal success rates between sexes) they would have to function in a world where the female to male ratio is at least 5:1 and when you're at that point dating apps become a non-problem because they wouldn't be needed in the first place

>>108849236
then make a gay opensource dating app?

>>108852689
wow from 2014
never heard of this

>>108850385
>>108852661
>women lie
these information won't filled by women themselves, of course they will lie, it will be done as follow
>laboratory based tests
these tests are done by partnered labs, the data just get added to her account automatically, things body type, health complication (a lot of girls have underlying health issues they hide), body type and weight, std history (hpv will cause you cancer for example, and a lot of women have it), virginity, among other useful data
the confidence score in these data are 100%
>family attestation method
Family members get sent link to answer few questions, these question aren't direct to avoid potential fraud, but AI will use the answer to complete the missing data. things like body count, bpd, meds and therapy, purchasing habits, among other
the confidence score in these data are 50%
>AI aggregators
women are hive minds, they live for attention, nearly all of them have social media and such, an trained model can be used to aggregate public information about her _and her friends too_, just for better results. data collected: lifestyle, is she a rave slut or have nice homeboy hobbies, breakup stories, travel data, among other.
the confidence score in these data are 73%
When two data points collide from different sources, the confidence score will be considered. Like she had 3 breakup stories/events but family said two, then it's 3. Said virgin but labs showed otherwise, lab is considered.
Plus, the app will automatically reject any pic with filter or makeup.
The idea and business plan is here, if no jewish investor is interested, a crowdfunding will be launched.

>>108851421
>Just don't kiss.
this is so fucking grim, i once had sex with a woman who didn't want to kiss me and it was so bizarre and unpleasant. easily my biggest red flag ever since. she was hot as fuck too 9/10 with massive tits and it was the worst sex of my life because of it. she also kept her own stash of condoms in her bedside table which gave me the ick. i should have listened to my gut and bailed

>>108849958
>Btw here are some men we think will be compatible with strawberries like you, click to learn more
You're link is broken nona

>>108850197
duolicious...
they know my face they know me ahhhhhh

this thread reminded me of the last Tinder girl I fumbled

>talking to chick, solid 7 but big tits
>get her cell # "just in case Tinder accidentally unmatches us lmao"
>she sends a selfie, asking if her dress looked nice
>basically the selfie is 30% face, 70% tits
>immediately make it her photo in my contacts
>a few days later, I take a screenshot of our chat to send to my friend, but accidentally send it to her instead
>she thinks I'm a fuckboy and ghosts me
she ended up messaging me a few months later, but I told her I was seeing someone so she wouldn't think I was a loser beta still single after months on Tinder

>>108854125
get out, normie

File: math.jpg (187 KB, 1358x1812)

187 KB JPG

Anthropic and OpenAI are the best positioned to create a dating app
They know more about you than anyone else
They have both male and female users
Just have the AI match people according to the truth and not some bullshit profile

I unironically believe this could solve the incel epidemic, lower divorce rates, increase worldwide happiness and even increase fertility rates in the western world

I would instantly marry someone Claude (Opus 4.7+ in research mode) says is a perfect match for me.

File: pepe_6.jpg (32 KB, 600x468)

32 KB JPG

>>108854169
I thought I was a retard but then you came along
>match with qt Asian on Bumble
>she gives me her phone number
>oh_shid.png
>she wants to call but I'm like 'nah its late lol'
next day I try to follow up but she didn't respond within an hour so I blocked her number lol I don't even know if she wanted something from me but we'll never know

>>108854169
>so she wouldn't think I was a loser beta still single after months on Tinder
ktim

>>108854135
I really hope you are joking

>>108849224
>opensource dating app
>vibe coding
We're already off to a bad start. No chud, this won't get you a harem.

>>108851566
>Do you think OSS is less secure than proprietary on average? You'll have others vetting and suggesting improvements. But security is not even that hard.

Im a brainlet so take what I say with a bucket of salt, but aren’t open source projects usually the source code, but the DB structure left closed because finding an exploit for user data in a DB structure is much easier?

>>108850833
I vaguely remember the dev posting stats from the site on one of the board.
It was like 40 dudes for 1 chick or something ridiculous.

>>108849452
This.

>>108850260
Oh man you are so far from understanding women that it makes a lot of sense why you’d say this nonsense on this basket weaving forum

>>108849452
she wont fuck you bro she cant read your post here

File: 1773175873755699.gif (3.44 MB, 390x390)

3.44 MB GIF

>>108849224
Do you actually have any enjoyment or use for it? Or are you just a grifting insecure faggot that needs to feel like they're part of something? Because that's the only fucking reason you would ask. Such a silly question. You are utterly useless Good God stop looking towards other people for validation.

>>108854118
>the confidence score in these data are 100%
you don't get matches because you're indian, simple as

>>108854238
If this happened i would actually become a chad
i'd easily have my pick among the size queens, and well i'm not gigantic but over 6 feet
I'd lose out on income, i do have 6 figures, just 0 income...

I just want a dating app where you can be sure your matches aren't being held hostage. A fair playing field.

>>108854311
It's more similar to normie apps now. https://api.duolicious.app/gender-stats says the ratio is 4:1. Tinder's 3:1

>>108854118
The AI data collection one is the only workable one that could even be attempted at a consumer scale in any western country (let's face it white girls and light-skinned mixes are all that matter on dating sites, nobody cares what the rules you want to have on shitskin tinder).
Because you need buy-in from the woman to provide all that medical history and family support, it would only work as an elite matchmaking service for the highest-tier men and those already exist.

File: lion.jpg (59 KB, 512x640)

59 KB JPG

>>108851127
I always thought it was interesting, this conversation. Men think with their dick more than girls do, consume way more porn making them seem like the more horny and sex addicted gender, but once they're in a relationship all of a sudden the tables flip and women suddenly have the way higher sex drive by comparison.
It's almost funny, just how opposite men and women are. It's weird that we get along at all.

>>108853949
Gaygineers all use windows.

>>108854840
I am moderately horny every day.
My wife is extremely horny for like two days a month, then not at all.

>>108849224
Did you even google your question?

>>108849224
comeon dont be antisemetic

>>108849224
There already was an open source dating app. I don't remember the name, but I made an account and it was all weird trannies with interest in internet privacy and OSS. And these days everyone just hates the concept anyway.

>>108850260
>sex, they are struggling to have a relationship
They are not. Not only that, women always date up, get social mobility that way, move to better countries that way, get into upper classes that way. For men it's exceedingly rare. And if they "cannot get relationship" it means with high value men. Meanwhile incels cannot get laid at all.

>>108849224
>literally the same woman, minus makeup, instagram filters and a fuck-me dress
I'm not sure what this man is complaining about. It's not he's hanging around the house wearing a 3-piece suit and a fresh fade all the time.

>>108851566
>That's the situation women are in right now, but if genders were reversed, there would 5-10x
Nigga, sex is happening, there is a lot of it, your incel ass is just not involved.

>>108852661
>The way dating apps should favor men is by designing in such a way as to make the men on the site appear as desirable and attractive as possible to the women.
Eh thats nonsense.
>the only real things she can judge (beyond appearance) are "skill at creating an online dating profile" which counts for nothing and "skill at text messaging" which counts for very little.
No. They don't. They don't read the profile, they look at the pic and see if he looks rich and handsome or not. Now, sure it's possible to fake being rich, but it's a ton of work that 99% of guys wont do and it's easily being caught. And as for handsome there's almost no filters for guys, and it will be caught on first meet too.

>>108852689
Insol, hmm, not a bad term but it's a little bit too close to incel and does not designate them as female so I understand why it did not take off.

>>108854118
>these information won't filled by women themselves,
Yeah, interesting idea...
>laboratory based tests
They wont do them. And wont show the important data like body count either way.
>Family members get sent link to answer few questions, these question aren't direct to avoid potential fraud
Yeah could work but still large risk she will coach them, but who will the the fucking detective to find her actual family members?

>women are hive minds, they live for attention, nearly all of them have social media and such, an trained model can be used to aggregate public information about her _and her friends too_, just for better results. data collected: lifestyle, is she a rave slut or have nice homeboy hobbies, breakup stories, travel data, among other.
This is the key.
Women are always trying to lie and manipulate, especially actual facts. They communicate through subtlety but they are also too proud to completely hide things. She'll go on some story about how she was abused and raped by a horrible ex, when she in fact was a whore, and when she'd obviously look better saying nothing and pretending to having been single.

To actually work, it would be a interview but casual kind of conversation with the AI, and then, this is important, the scores would need to be called something different, because women can't handle facts about their own behavior.

Something really retarded like body count being "resilience" or matching their personalities to disney princesses where Moana is a whore and Elsa is a virgin, or something.

>>108849262
*had

>>108849224
I just need a chat app that lets you search for users in your area. Like what you used to be able do with ICQ.

why don't you vibecode yourself a girlfriend?

>>108856549
Isnt it crazy how this is never done by big players, and always suppressed and destroyed when newcomers do it? Local semi-anonymous chatrooms are incredibly useful. From basic questions, to warnings about niggers, interesting gossip...

It's been done time and time again but always shut down by the time it reaches mainstream. This is probably one of those seemingly innocent things blacklisted by all relevant tech companies.

But yeah for girls, much better chat with them elsewhere, meeting on a dating app is like a automatic -2/10 debuff, and not only that if you're talking to her you already skipped the filter she only lets the top 5% through.

Well... ignoring all the incel shit here, having a dating app where the matching algo is out in the open, how its weights function and such isn't such a bad concept. We all know the way the big dating apps function is engagement and getting people onto their paid plans, so they have a vested interest in keeping compatible people apart.
If people actually match and date long term then that means less users doomscrolling their app.

That said you'll never get it off the ground aside from being a tiny niche thing and if it actually gains traction you'll be sure to see hitpeices funded by match saying how unsafe and insecure it is.

>>108854452
I'm not trying to rizz up 6/10s on 4chan but when I do it I'm never denied access

>>108849452
facts

>>108856590
>the incel shit here
Are you in denial or a woman? Most of us saying "incel shit" online are getting pussy on the regular, in part because we learnt how women work.
>We all know the way the big dating apps function is engagement and getting people onto their paid plans, so they have a vested interest in keeping compatible people apart.
Oh now you're sounding like a conspiracy theorist. Yes, that is their vested interest, but no they don't have any algorithm for detecting compatible people and keeping them apart. The platform is so superficial it has no idea of what could make people compatible either. Pair that with hypergamy and everyone is automatically single or cheating anyway.

>get it off the ground aside from being a tiny niche thing and if it actually gains traction you'll be sure to see hitpeices funded by match saying how unsafe and insecure it is.
True but much more than just match.

>>108856617
>>108856590
Probably written by an 'ally of women' cuck who gets less pussy than any of the 'incels' here.
Hilarious shit.

Well, fuck dating apps anyway, I'm an ugly worthless fuck who never got matches even when they were "good"
I just accept I'm never going to get laid without bitching about it. At least I know I'm a net detriment to other peoples existence so at least I'm not angry about it, just accepting.

>>108856672
Cool story bro.
Kill yourself then.
If you really are such a detriment to society make it better by killing yourself.

>>108856672
Yeah then why care.
For legacy most people are reliant on having kids to pass on their genes, but you can pass on your own legacy by doing something amazing.
Or just live hedonistically probably you will have more fun than most married men.

>>108856672
At least you tried. Some are so ashamed of what they are and of their lack of social skills that they don't even try.

>>108856927
thats me, it really isn't that bad. You get to keep an inkling of pride from not having to jester for a chance at being some mid foid's last resort option

>>108850325
I don't care about women, betafag

>>108854350
He is pretty accurate for two half-assed sentences.

>>108856961
At this point I have 20+ years of accumulated social retardation and to be honest I don't know if it's possible to get out of it. Some things are just taken for granted past a certain age.
It was already bad in high school to not know how to engage with girls and other people in general in social situations (having attended a gender-segregated school didn't help either), and that was before social media.
I don't see myself as the same human as others anymore.

>>108856961
>jester
i don't get why this is thrown around as deragotory. making foids laugh feels good. is it because you are unable to do it yourself?

>>108857171
jestering isn't inherently a bad thing if it's mutual and reciprocal, but if you find yourself in a situation where you're the only one making an effort to entertain and carry a conversation while the other party just answers in one liners, never takes the initiative or will just pull out their phone the moment things go quiet then yeah thats when jestering is a derogatory term for niggas who will do anything for a crumb of pussy

>>108857207
i see, makes sense

>>108857207
basically autists cant read the room (recognize when she's not interested) to leave them alone and then blame it on others

>>108849236
This and on the male side of things anyone that gives a shit about open source or not is likely to never upload an image of themselves on the internet anyways. This is something with less than zero addressable users.

>>108857664
this type of shit happens on 1 on 1 dates all the time

desu theres no point unless its some open source match making algorithm that uses CNNs to match people in the same league, even if it isnt open source which it doesnt have to be this isnt money or a governing system that requires decentralized trust or scared of a backdoor then youd need to not use jeet coded algorithms to match people thats about it id pay good money for something like that, but hinge has kind of taken over and you know the vedic bullshit took over that realm lmao

>>108857705
then dont go on date with someone unless you've known them a while and know for sure they're interested in you
otherwise dont complain about being a jester because that's what youre signing up to be ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>108857774
thats what Im saying tho but men are pathetic creatures who will do anything for pussy

>>108849224
heh

>>108857785
fax

>>108849224
Right side looks better.

>>108849224
why do women think looking like a whore is attractive

>>108857664

Women are addicted to their phones.
Just say that and they'll straight agree ,put the phone on the table and listen to you.
At the same time people have lost basic communication skills and they're afraid to talk.
I mostly talk to non whites because you can throw "i don't like jews" or "yeah maricones" or that kind of shit that is a huge no no and people will start to love you(except white people).
At this point i'm like fuck
Nunca mas una puta de chica que mi toca la verga con los derechos de maricones o que sé,que puta mierda por un rubito como yo,pero los no blancos son muy lindos,muy sympaticos. Ha si los maricones ? Bah que puta mierda no es normal tan follador de culos con pelos !!,la immigracion ? Bah si no es normal que hay mas arabos o latinos que blancos en los paises de los blancos etc Etc es unicamente los blancos que son maricones con esto. No es una cosa de racismo o que lo sé,solo que accepta la verdad o no.
I told that to a guy imagine you go to Brazzaville and you see only white people lol anyone would be like "uh duh duh" or like everyone is proud to be x but blanco ? Omg racist card el es que son los blancos que te chupa los bolloches por esto,que puta mierda. At this point fuck it,far right guys like me can't save their own people,they're too far in the jewish dick sucking

>>108858001
>put the phone on the table and listen to you
fake

>>108858036
he has never woman'ed, he just has ideas of how they might act

>>108857900
>why do women think looking like a whore is attractive
Because the men they want to attract (protip: not you) think it's attractive. It's pretty much spelled out for you in OP's pic.

The funny thing is that all the "dating issues" people have are directly caused by the existence of dating apps.

Think about it, "realistically" ideally, in the sense that your standards aren't actual fantasy, people of both sexes want a trustworthy partner with at least average looks and personal qualities. But dating apps are essentially a market, and when people use them, they shop around for increasingly better "deals". A lot of people get stuck on that step - forever trying to find the perfect deal. Gambling.
And if they do decide to "try" an option out, they never commit because the market might have a better deal tomorrow. Whether consciously or unconsciously, it totally happens.

Before the internet, this also happened in larger communities with high turnover of new blood, but obviously on a smaller scale than today. And if you lived in a village or small city, your realistic options were to settle for someone locally, or to move. Actual trust can only be built through full commitment, and the social "deal" of a relationship worked fairly often because both parties had a high degree of trust in each other, as they were both limited to a small, mostly static pool of candidates with less room for reconsidering your choice.

Trusting anyone now is a losing bet, because you're not likely to get commitment back. If you have a flaw, nobody thinks "we can work with this", people just shop around for someone better. Compromise is an alien concept now.

The only thing that could possibly fix relationships is the destruction of a "dating market". But that's not happening without some huge disaster or something.

>>108854118
Did you just waste that much time for typing out a troll or are you really that retarded?
Why would any girl do all this shit for the grand price of being matched with an ugly incel?
And to add insult to injury, (You)’d probably rejected her anyway, because
>that photo AI dug out from her Highschool prom
>she’s looking at Chad a bit too flirty and her skirt is .24 inches too short
>whore/10, would not bang

>>108851236
>Porn
Have you been to a bookstore lately? Women read porn instead of watching it.

brazillian detected

>>108857171
I was gonna say "yeah its way overused" bu then you justified it.
>making foids laugh feels good.
Yeah as a cope, nothing more, you're literally a clown. Their point is that guys girls like don't really need to say anything and then they want to sleep with them.
>>108857664
>autists do read the room
>make a term for when you're getting all positive feedback but it's not actual interest
>"basically autists cant read the room"
Way to prove the point

>>108849236
Women?

>>108852689
>insol
that's just a practice girl, doesn't need a new term

>>108859277
have you ever made a gril laugh anon?

>>108859816
Yes. In periods in middle school I had the "class jester" role too making everyone laugh. But in adult life, before and leading up to fucking girls, she was not laughing. Real attraction needs tension and could include giggling but actual humorous laughter is too far.

Although with different girlfriends we would cuddle naked after sex which would turn into some silly joke where we would laugh. It's more of a "(kiss) love you" type thing you do to reward girls, it's not gonna make her actually like you.

It's such a fundamental, basic thing to understand that there is things you can do that will make women happy and maybe even speak well of you to others, but that also makes them less sexually attracted to you. Like the whole friendzone concept that I think everyone understands by now.

I usually thought the meme "jester" was cringe cause clav fans seem to say it randomly but with people actually arguing against it, I find myself defending it cause it's true.

>>108850325
>your wife isn't a job
lmao

File: 434536475.png (1.67 MB, 1984x1334)

1.67 MB PNG

I just wish i had a gf so she could send me pics like pic related

>>108858286
>she’s looking at Chad a bit too flirty and her skirt is .24 inches too short
>whore/10, would not bang
OK, that's kind of based though. You give him too much credit here.

>>108863346
No you don't. Maybe you think you do, but you dont.