>>108855332
Will ANY closed source cuck software survive the AI era????

>Claude 4.7 is getting good enough to actually do shit when told to and fix a reasonable amount of errors
>Claude mythos SUPPOSEDLY ("bro trust me bro PLEASE trust me") absolutely shits on it
>The functionality of any closed source tool can just be described to these bots
>with millions of times less effort than manually debugging and testing every little problem, something like photoshop or premiere pro could be theoretically cloned with these tools
>same with almost anything that doesn't need server side processing

Its an interesting time we're going through, Microsoft are investing hundreds of billions into a technology that, at the ideal level of intelligence, would just be able to singlehandedly end the dominance of microsoft windows by seamlessly writing flawless software that perfectly exports their every file format and copies everything you can do on a windows machine for a business purpose.

The more you think about it the funnier it gets, I've realized that AI is going to destroy all software company moats as a side effect of it reaching maturity.

Oh so NOW AIslop is suddenly good?

>>108855453
The real tech people on this board have been defending coding agents.

>>108855431
I've been telling people this for the past 2 years, how the fuck are they going to make AI just good enough to replace (you), but not good enough to allow (you) to replace an entire corporate team at Microsoft or wherever? they can't sandbag it so precisely, it's going to do neither or both

>>108855469
>but not good enough to allow (you) to replace an entire corporate team at Microsoft

Hardware signing and attestation. You will run the software that they will allow you to.

>>108855453
reminds me of how some people have been using AI to develop their decompilations
The only ones complaining about this are trannies on twitter.
Frankly if you ask me the gloves are coming off
Any and all pieces of software will eventually be decompileable.
You will eventually see decomps of adobe shit without the tracking.

>>108855332
will any software survive? There are surely many projects cloning many packages using ai. right now :^)

>>108855332
How much of that was using leaked windows source code in claude's data set?

What if the ai generated Microsoft code that it was trained on? Isn't wine very strict about not using decompiled or leaked code?

File: 1766651708026113.png (1.47 MB, 897x900)

1.47 MB PNG

>>108855463
>>108855505
LLMs are real and they're insanely powerful and anyone who denies this simply hasn't used them or is bad at using them. But it's a mixed bag because they will clearly have an impact on jobs, especially tech jobs, especially programmers. These things can just straight up do a "good enough" job on projects you previously needed to pay a guy 6 figures and that took multiple months to do. I think a lot of the anti AI discourse comes from programmers who, either consciously or subconsciously, realize that this technology is the realest threat to their entire profession that exists. I've come to realize that, and it doesn't make me happy. But at the same time, this is the coolest technology we have ever invented.

It's a really mixed bag.

No horseshit here, I don't know how good claude is at coding because I'm a nocoder, but it has helped me substantially with random automation bullshit on linux and macOS without breaking a single thing

>>108855332
>But some dialogs may still end up causing crashes and some GPU-Accelerated features may not be fully baked.
Okay so it's another broken application like with any Windows application that aren't form the XP era.

Can AI be used to create use cases?

>>108856011
its like a junior programmer that had time to research every topic but gets its memory wiped every task. it can get shit done but never that well and will just follow instructions literally

File: 1774479114852914.png (724 KB, 2560x1440)

724 KB PNG

>>108855332
Windows desktop is dead since Windows 10.
MicroJeet killed it.
Wake the fuck up, anon.

>>108856204
Sometimes that's all I need, really
I see people doing strenuously complicated bullshit with these agents and I just couldn't trust it to do things that would take me a long time to verify that they're correctly done. But for simple tasks it's just simpler than fucking around or looking for a particular piece of software somewhere to do it. I'm a brainlet when it comes to even basic scripting.

>Linuxfags have to resort to AI doing their work to fulfill their dream of destroying Windows
You've been at it for over three decades. You lost, free desktop is a failed experinent, you were never going to defeat commercial software through ideology, let it go already.

>>108856292
>"You lost" says Kumar, as he blogposts about Windows trying to catch up with Linux performance

File: 1768048847165526.jpg (1.25 MB, 3262x1672)

1.25 MB JPG

>>108856330
>anyone not relentlessly hating Windows like me must be brown and on Microsoft's payroll
I accept your concession.

Posting this while shitting on the toilet like a white man I am btw

>>108855332
all it's done is just to iteratively stub out the routines in dlls and make regedits for whatever throws an error, and then a patch mfplat py file doing something. the rest is just markdown fodder and retarded shell scripts holding commands for a one click install.
this is the only file of substance https://github.com/sander110419/lightroom-cc-on-linux/blob/main/scripts/patch_mfplat.py

>>108855469
Corporate contracts. Microsoft hasn't been a software house in ages in terms of selling stuff to consumers. They're selling B2B services. Modern companies hate doing anything themselves, if they can outsource it they will while "focusing on core business". This means that they're buying their mail, office, conferencing, IM, software from someone. And because they're buying it from someone they get a 99.999% SLA with it so they don't have to worry about anything.

>>108856363
post the log next time

>>108855538
A nuanced opinion on /g/. What's next, frogs will rain?

>>108855538
WE already have had superior free tools to Adobe's crap for decades. Enterprises pay for live support and content features for their specific pipelines, not raw software access like they're just another nerd in the basement. That's why these kinds of big SaaS companies in 3d/cloud management/etc will still exist forever.

>2026
>Loonixtards are still coping at the thought of Loonix finally being relevant outside of servers while still failing to realize what actually holds back adoption
classic

>>108856267
Could you share details on how you managed to make vs run on linux?

>>108855332
It will. The moment you can run pirated version... It's over.

>>108855481
That can never work on PC because it would require Microsoft to dictate which specific PC's can run Windows.

If they just say "You need a TPM" well, you can emulate that in software.

>>108855538
the more i use them the more i realize their weaknesses. They don't do "good enough" job for anything serious unless you handhold them.
If you can't see how they suck you have a skill issue.

>>108860524
This is because they're deliberately gatekeeping the good models behind paywalls.

>>108860524
As a long time slop bot hater I'm seeing impressive stuff in the field of reverse engineering when claude is used correctly by a knowledgeable person in the right setting.
You are correct about 99.9% of AI use though its almost all just trash that looks passable for a second until you dig deeper, I wanted to say its a mixed bag but its more like a lottery.

>>108855431
Windows isn't dominant anymore, it's hosted AD and office that everyone cares about (including them.)