>>108856139
If only there was a good desktop environment.

>>108856139
I'm guessing bootc is a systemd replacement?

>>108856251
No
>Transactional, in-place operating system updates using OCI/Docker container images. bootc is the key component in a broader mission of bootable containers.

>The original Docker container model of using "layers" to model applications has been extremely successful. This project aims to apply the same technique for bootable host systems - using standard OCI/Docker containers as a transport and delivery format for base operating system updates.

>The container image includes a Linux kernel (in e.g. /usr/lib/modules), which is used to boot. At runtime on a target system, the base userspace is not itself running in a container by default. For example, assuming systemd is in use, systemd acts as pid1 as usual - there's no "outer" process.

>>108856251
It's literally bootable containers. How do you even think is a systemd replacement? At least fucking google before you post.

>>108856339
>>108856372
oh I don't understand docker very well and virtualisation Sint for me so I'm out

>>108856139
Will Fedora use that by default in the future?

>>108856448
it's about update delivery
your os is just an image you can swap at boot
you can run rhel then reboot into ubuntu

>>108856473
yes

For the last time, I'm not bloating my home computer with container nonsense
I won't use docker
I won't use shitpaks or snaps
I won't use appimages
I won't use overlays and immutable memes
I will use my computer as Linus designed it, with properly installed applications and a regular file tree hierarchy

>>108856473
Yes. And Ubuntu says they're going to release a bootc spin by 2028.