>89% of leaders say AI has not improved their company's labor productivity, despite widespread adoption, per Gallup.uh oh!
>>108857825It makes everyone lazy, dumber, and give less of a shit.
oh no no no wait for it...
I'll admit it's kind of strange consider most employees don't work at all. I imagine a bot would legitimately be better than most people for most positions even in its current state and I observe it getting better over time.So why isn't it actually helping them?I saw some article about people intentionally using it wrong and wasting tokens/money out of protest / to keep their job security.Could that actually be what's making up that percentage or do you think it's actually ineffective?
i use ai to generate anime sluts who wear very little clothing
AI is good for finding out specific information instantly(learning), and that's it.
>>108857980I am currently learning javascript, with a book and find it much better than a fucking LLM and if there is something I don't get I just go to the MDN.
>>108857825It's because everyone use it differently:One person is 10 times more productive.A handful barely more productive And the rest between "a bit more stupid" to "a whole lot stupid and lazy"So it cancels out in the end.
>>108857967in my case, the time it take are like 2 to generate code, 1 to fix issues and 6 to ensure the code and development trajectory can be understood by human. junior dev btwonce they are reliable enough to work without human reviewing every little thing then the pace will be insane
>>108857994you can use all, docs, a book an ai
>>108857967>>108858058Sorry, to clarify I meant like most jobs, not programming specifically.I agree that for programming it's not there yet in terms of time saving versus an experienced developer. At least not for novel tasks, only good in the hands of an experienced person when doing already solved problems.But for a lot of non-programming tasks, it seems pretty good. At least better than nothing which I feel like most people are doing because they have no work ethic and a "fuck the boss (ignore the customer and my team mates)" mentality.
>>108857825>b...but muh productivity
>dilation ratio ITT is 100%
total snailGAWD victory
codex 5.5 just oneshot'd a bug that would had taken me a whole day based on the diagnosisit found and patched the bug in 5 minutes
>>108857825>crash the labor market anyway in your path
>>108857825Today I went and got a burger whilst claude did a task that would've taken me 3-4 hours of constant focus and staring at my screen, it took 10 minutes to write the prompt and another 15 minutes to check if it made any aberrations once it was done.I do own my company though, I can see how an employee at a large enterprise would just do the bare minimum with AI and output the same performance as before
>>108857825I want you to go back and look at articles from the 1980s. That argued that the personal computer wasn’t adding anything to productivity either.
>>108858723Not all labor counts as productive. If you spend 4 hours on something that is of no value to anyone what have you really produced? This covers the majority of how AI is used
Half of the companies that laid people off have also already rehired people, for much more money.
>>108858965it wasn't, the internet made it useful
>>108857967because they use it in stupid ways and simply push work of verifying their bullshit onto those few competent people. So nothing changes in the end
>>108858965I sometimes feel they had a point, recently couldn't get onboarded at a new company because of a system break. From previous experience I know this is a 3 month sort of deal but then some chick from HR just did it manually and I'm in, 2 days. But even aside from that, just a few years ago Meta was trying to push the idea that everyone working in the meta verse. I heard some of the exact same clowning from hype addicted project managers. That died and now they're on AI, LLM's are more useful but they're probably going to kill that too. I actually can't wait for project managers to drop it once the market crashes because that's when we'll really figure out what can and can't be done with it.
>>108857825They don't need to increase their productivity, moron. >Get AI>Fire 1,000 chuds>Productivity stays the same>Save millions on wages, salaries, benefits>Win
>>108857994There's an entire group of zoomers and alpha kids learning that documentation is a thing and being amazed by it.LIKE WOAH, IT DOESN'T HALLUCINATE?!
>>108857825snailcat bros won.
>>108859839Turns out all we had to do was wait it out and it would blow over.AI is just a tool like any other. Its not going to change anything substantially for real work. AI evangelists lost.
>innerHTMLlemao
It was 98% a few months ago
>>108859877>that innerHTML>templates in ${item}, presumably unescaped.what the FUCK is this?
Its helped me a ton, I work for a defense company. There were quite a few projects everyone was way too lazy to actually do, so we were just spinning our wheels and taking naps at work, working from home from weeks at a time and just playing WoW. But with a GPT pro I manged to get two of those projects off the ground and promoted to IPT lead. Do I know CUDA programming? No. Is one of the projects almost entirely based on CUDA optimization? Yes lmaoI will say, it fills gaps and speeds things up, but there is a threshold. Had to restart a few times, I don't know how to undo a prompt, because it recommends and builds based on stupid assumptions.So its made me money
>>108859927it's from the Google i/o presentation right now lol
>>108859965w-what?!
>>108860030https://youtu.be/wYSncx9zLIU>>>108858697
AI companies are fucking retarded, that's why. This is shit is way too bloated and slow, and instead of trying to make smaller, domain limited models, they just bloat up dogshit that's a jack of all trades and master of none.This shit is not realistically making a dent until the bubble pops and they're forced to offer tiny models that work at 90% the efficiency but 10% of the cost.
>>108860044jesus fucking christ.
>>108857825and that's with massive subsidies lol. What a joke
>>108857967>out of protest / to keep their jobpeople are literally being forced to use that shit by management. of course they are going to burn tokens.
>>108857825s-so you're telling me there's 11% chance we might improve performance??t. a leader
>>108858965Sorry, all I could find are articles about how symbolic AI will replace experts in a few years.
>>108857825AI has replaced so many people that the few people remaining cannot hope to match the productivity from before.
>>108857967>consider most employees don't work at all.Prove it
>>108862387>pleaseNo.
>>108857825>>108858299what do American companies produce
>>108857825>>108857967threadly reminder that the plandemic revealed that this System is able to chug along nicely with only about 30% to 40% of the average human input.
>>108857825meow
