Damn, anons. I finally found living proof that AI can't replace artists (holy shit, I'm commissioning one right now, for God's sake). Do you see it? Yeah, the fucking attached pic. I first asked mainstream AIs to remove the clothes from this texture. The faggots didn't have the balls to do it at all. Then I switched to local visual AIs, and they did nothing but produce garbage. Then I finally switched to generative models dedicated to the images, and holy shit, how embarrassing! Hahaha. The inpainting, masks, and prompts from the shitty engineers managed to produce worse results than the general-purpose models... Skill issue? I don't think so, I put my 5080 through the wringer, and nothing good came of it, and thank goodness it's 2000+27.
Holy shit! So much reason to sell!
OP just discovered boiling water
LMAO
>>108859206I draw tits for free for the fun of it, asses too, even. Why did you feel you had to buy a 5080 to not even get the tits you want?I thought AI was supposed to democratize this kind of stuff and be cheaper. Where are all the snailcat posters?
>>108859836But the fact is, no matter how good I am at setting up these tools (that's what I'm for, ultimately), the result will only ever be partially controlled. If you think about it, you can only achieve a very specific task if you talk to a professional in the field (in my case, an artist), contact them, show them the 64x76 PNG I uploaded in OP, and if they're good at it, they'll complete the job in the best possible way. But the most important thing is that it will understand the job 101% better than the AI, which, I remember, despite the well-set mask (pixel for pixel), reproduces monstrosities like these, also taking into account the well-set prompts with the various models and the relevant time. I'm pretty sure this isn't a skill issue on my part, whether with stable diffusion or with other types of AI... It's simply a roll of luck every damn time
>>108859940>that's what I'm for, ultimatelyTypo, i meant "that's what they are for, ultimately"
>>108859940>>108859968Why did you think it's called slop? The frustration you are feeling is because you're not compromising. You made the mistake of thinking that an ai could deliver what you actually want - that's the first scam they want you to buy into. The second is convincing you that you should just be happy with what you get. That spirals until all you have is the same homogenized slop for only the goodest of goycattles.
>>108860010Look, anon, I already knew what you're saying. I've never paid subscriptions to mainstream models online in my life; when I needed them, it was only to kill the boredom and maybe some coding stuff. I won't deny that they've saved my ass a few times in the coding field, but let's give Caesar what's his... Since I switched to a 'flagship' GPU, I thought that with the right models and the right settings, I could push this type of equipment to the max. What a good way to strip away the clothes of a 2D texture from Jill Valentine for PS1? And nothing, I realized after 2TB of models to run in LMStudio and stable diffusion, the stupidest of things isn't possible? Angry? Maybe just for the wasted watts, but certainly disappointed by the fact that slop exists even in local environments.
>d1sc0rd (d0t) com sl4sh invite sl4sh tech>"official" /g/ discord>full of FBI type authoritarian memes>Join, instantly banned before even seeing anythingWhat are these fags on?
anon there are 24/7 AI nudify threads on /b/. if you can't figure out how to use these tools to generate tranny pixel booba that's on you
>>108860168I don't think so anon, at this point it's easy to unmask your ragebaiting too
>>108860168The kind of crap you see on other boards is more generalist slop than specific as in the case of OP
>>108860437this
