It just works>b-but i need the latest packagesuse containers like a grown up
I am not an enterprise, ergo I would not benefit from an enterprise OS.
I do, I just don't have much to say about it.>use containersI don't need them.
>>108864061>i need the latest packagesTip:
I don't use it because I can enter dnf update every once in a while and my system doesn't break on regular Fedora. Enterprise isn't really meant for people who are consciously thinking of their computer. It's the kind of thing an administrator installs for someone else. You can just look up what actually happens within the company anyways to see what the productive adults are doing. Red Hat employees will just tell you that they aren't forced to use their own product, they usually run something more up to date like Fedora or even another distro or OS and run containers for RHEL not the other way around. Some even run Rawhide/Atomic because you can just pin a stable image and always have it on hand.
>>108864061I need a newer kernel. In fact I take the inverse approach. Some software I need is 'certified' for RHEL/Alma, so with a current Fedora, I run a Alma container.
>>108864061>its 2030>sit down at my computer and boot up fedora>oops, almost forgot to submit a sperm sample>3 minutes later>"identity verified">would you like to upgrade to redhat premiumshould i buy it bros
>>108864061Rolling release is the only sane way to do distributions. "Stable" shit is outdated garbage from when OSes were distributed on CDs.
>>108864875Rolling for desktop, stable for everything else. I am not updating my servers and containers and vm quests daily.
>>108864888s/quests/guests
>>108864061Ubuntu is enterprise Linux, I daily drive that.
>>108864061RHEL would be cool if they supported KDE again, but they won’t.
>>108864061>Why don't you just daily drive real emtreprise Linux?Because I want the buttery-smooth animations of GNOME 48, but Alma/Rocky only have GNOME 47.>use containers like a grown upHow would I do that for GNOME?
>>108864888You don't have "servers" and "containers", stop LARPing.
>>108864903based
10.2 Redhat isos and rpms dropped today. This is a big release for desktop users, lots of gnome components were updated from 47 to 49. Patiently waiting for the Oracle linux drop now.
>>108864998Why do they have to support it? It's readily available on EPEL. The clones even ship prebaked ISOs.
>>108865558Release notes dropped:https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/10/html/10.2_release_notes/index
>>108864061imagine using systemd-bloatdcouldn't be me
>>108865873we know, you keep spamming this board constantly
>>108864061>containers>grown upWhat's the matter faggot, afraid of a little autoreconf -i?
>>108865115Many of the old / not underage fags here have IT jobs. It doesn't necessarily mean they're doing well financially, but they're employed. Some even have [frequently underpaid] sysadmin positions, where managing servers and containerized services is par for the course.
>>108867884not that anon but okay? its not up to an employee to pick the operating system for containers and theyre not "his"
>>108864875>Rolling release is the only sane way to do distributionsNo sane person wants to update their OS, or even their third party software, at all, let alone multiple times a year. You're criminally insane if you enjoy regular updates.
>>108867903I consider all of the endpoints I manage for clients to be mine, because I deployed, configured, and maintain them. I don't care if they legally "belong" to someone else. Your laws mean nothing to me.
>>108864061but the literal kids all use containers.
>ENTERPRISE QUALITY>good thing
>>108864061If you want a distro that "just works" you should use a debian derivative. There's no reason to use IBM slop in 2026.
>>108864061>Why don't you just daily drive real emtreprise Linux?I'm sick of you people misusing words. Just say what you mean using the proper definitions of the words.What you really are trying to say is not "enterprise" Linux, but corporate Linux, a Linux made by a corporation which used in business. There, that's better. Now your question answers itself: corporate Linux might as well be WIndows, but free for the download and can hopefully go longer between crashes.I'll stick to real non-corporate Linux, thanks.
>>108865574Completely different support cycle.
>>108864061Why don't you just daily drive desktop linux instead of being a faggy contrarian?
>>108868174The debian guys are so disorganized they forgot to nominate someone qualified for project leader so some fat non-binary blob Jeeta snuck in. Ubuntu is beta-testing admittedly broken rust coretools replacements in their LTS version. It’s the RHEL or SUSE family. Anything else is a meme.
>>108864261>X11
>>108868213Enterprise is different from corporate in this context. Though they are often used interchangeably, enterprise Linux does not necessarily signify that the distribution is produced by a corporate entity (but these days, many do contribute to the kernel). Some distributions that are fundamentally community-driven and maintained, while seeing extensive use in corporate / enterprise environments, are: Alma, Alpine, Alt, Debian, and Rocky. Your definition applies to distros like Azure, Oracle, RHEL, SLE, and Ubuntu.
>>108864061>use containers like a grown upkiddo, real grownups compile from source that they personally scanned for bugs
