[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now closed. Thanks to all who applied!


[Advertise on 4chan]


A general for Frontier Chads, Opencode builders on a budget. Pick your model and talk shit.

## What “vibe coding” is, and how to do it
https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/19/vibe-coding/
https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/11/using-llms-for-code/

----

## Frontier models using fully-general tooling — start here if you have $20 or so
https://developers.openai.com/codex/cli
https://claude.com/product/claude-code

## Mid tier
https://opencode.ai/
https://cursor.com/docs
https://antigravity.google/

## Open / local / self-hosted
https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands
https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code
https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3-Coder
https://huggingface.co/bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF

----

## Prompting / context / skills
https://arps18.github.io/posts/claude-code-mastery/
https://simonwillison.net/guides/agentic-engineering-patterns/using-git-with-coding-agents/
https://github.com/mattpocock/skills — /grill-me is a favorite

## Other editors / terminal agents / coding agents
https://x.ai/cli
https://docs.windsurf.com/
https://docs.cline.bot/
https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/coding-agent

## UI/Frontend
https://www.figma.com/make/
https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-design-anthropic-labs
https://uiverse.io/
https://ui-ux-pro-max-skill.nextlevelbuilder.io/
https://stitch.withgoogle.com/

## In-browser builders / hosted vibe tools
https://bolt.new/
https://replit.com/
https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/tutorials/spark
https://v0.app/docs

## Benchmarks / rankings
https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0

## Previous thread
>>109003462
>>
>>109013551
I imagine that's the reason, I just need to come up with some ways to use up more before it resets so it doesn't go to waste.
>>
File: 1768341089403482.png (35 KB, 773x561)
35 KB PNG
>>
>>109013584
I just got done watching the keynote and Platforms State of the Union
Seems like Apple is moving fast and fixing things
>>
opus 4.8 high seems very token efficient
>>
>>109013577
Not sure how many projects you have but starting a fresh session & having it review a project, then having it verify all the memories are still valid will burn through a good chunk of tokens
>>
I have a personal project with a backend (python) and frontend in two separate repos. I'm running a Claude instance on both, how can I let the instances "communicate"? A shared MD file between them?
>>
>>109013560
where can i play these wonderful snailcat games
>>
>>109013753
just wait until the end of this development cycle
>>
Does anyone here actually make money from a vibecoded app or project? I see tons of people claiming they've "created" stuff but 0 people showing off their earnings. Weird.
>>
>>109013783
I've earned a modest amount over the past year or so with automation tools for games on offerwall sites. somewhere in the range of 7-8k.
>>
>>109013783
The only time people even dare show what they "created" at all, let alone any earnings, it always turns out to either be profoundly broken (doesn't even compile level) or to be yet another notes app. And the worst is it's always "trust me bro" bullshit.
>>
>>109013783
My work pays for my codex max sub, feelsgood
>>
File: 1780950095449499.gif (2.32 MB, 229x234)
2.32 MB GIF
>>109013560
why don't you vibe coders make a snailcat game so I can play it. I keep seeing these box arts and it makes me sad
>>
the resident earnings schizo is back
>>
>>109013851
Because sadly, AI can't do anything like this. It would take 3 years for them to make a shitty buggy slow as balls web-only snailcat game, while even a noob could do a pretty fast 2d native game in 3 months.
>>
>>109013874
post your game. you are a yesdev, right?
>>
I would like to see an actual vibecoded project. Mine is ai-assisted but I wouldn't say it's vibecoded, by a long shot. I'm curious.
>>
>>109013895
How do you quantify it?
>>
>>109013783
these questions are quite useless because nobody is going to dox their golden goose. if i stumbled upon a money printer, i wouldnt tell a soul about it
>>
>>109013783
I typed /fleet runescape and I sell the gold
>>
>>109013897
Well, the backend is about 80% coded by hand, and the frontend is 100% ai-generated. But the frontend is simply an user interface for the backend (a Flask API), so the core features have been created by hand.

I guess everyone has their own definitions of what counts as being vibecoded.
>>
>>109013904
ill show you mine once i get this FUCKING CUSTOM RETARD FUCKING BLUEPRINT FAGGETRY done holy fucking shit kill me.
it's 100% vibe slop.
it's also pretty cool i think.
>>
>>109013940
What is it?
>>
File: WIP.gif (3.56 MB, 280x157)
3.56 MB GIF
>>109013851
>>
>>109013957
its just a local AI user interface.
i do a lot of diy hobby stuff and i despise the popular shit so i decided to have claude make me my own.
it's got a lot of features now and what i am working on right now is having the blueprint system on the right side summarize the chat into a prompt that then gets fed into an image generator which then gets fed into a mesh/model maker which then gets fed into a custom python script to take that mesh and turn it into a cool wireframe svg file, so i can have a visual representation of what im working on and even export an obj file for cad or blender.

shits fucking complicated though and i am struggling with claude due to linux amd python shenanigans.
>>
>>109013988
>its just a local AI user interface.
Called it.
>>
>>109013988
>its just a local AI user interface.
Oh, I thought it was something useful. Nevermind.
>>
>>109013715
i'd like them to be productive, just trying to think of some things I could schedule. Maybe some email cleanup stuff?

>>109013783
I think there are some people making money with AI slop on Instagram. Those people making the dog videos, for example, look up "coco the dog" or something, it's an AI dog and all the childless 30 year old women enjoy it
>>
June is going to be absolutely fucking insane.
>>
>>109014018
By project we usually mean like software. I don't know how profitable ai video slop generators and the likes actually are but I would not be surprised if those work to some extent, especially due to scale.
>>
>>109014024
If they can get gemini to be at least GPT 5.4 level, it will be a huge win.
>>
>>109014024
>gemini
This time for sure will be the actual good model! No, not that one, then next one!
>>
>>109014034
Still waiting for gemini to hit gpt-3 level desu senpai.
>>
>>109014072
for me, it's gemini. because every other model thinks like a normalfaggot. gemini is the retarded cousin who doesn't actually want to let you down.
>>
>Claude Fable
>>
>>109013961
I stood out of my chair and said kino
>>
>>109014030
I imagine a lot of the more pro level AI social media slop is custom software generated, probably very poorly made stuff that just gets the job done. I don't think there is a huge amount of people making money off the little one-off apps that they shit out, but maybe I'm wrong.
>>
>>109014178
I know for a fact they just prompt the frontier models and never use tools. I worked in or close to AI tools sales for a while in various spaces and it's exactly the same story every time.
>>
>>109014186
must be a good racket for now there is a lot of it
>>
>>109014220
One would expect. But could also just be 3rd worlders who make $100 across 10000 videos for example, using stolen keys to not spend too much.
>>
>>109014186
I thought meta and tiktok were clamping down on that pretty hard?
>>
>>109014281
instagram is full of slopgirls now
a lot of it isn't full ai, but faces swapped on borrowed vids n shit
most of the comments are horny dudes who can't tell
it's getting harder to tell with that stuff tb h and this is bottom of the barrel stuff
>>
>>109014292
I guess that makes sense, especially when considering as a concept short form content like that is inherently slop
>>
new slop word to add into your daily slopping "Atomic"
>>
If you have two Plus plans you can do GPT-5.5 High.
If you have one Plus plan you can only do GPT-5.4 High.

That's just how it is. 5.5 uses twice the usage.
>>
I'm at the point where I basically just let Codex crack and reverse engineer apps and live service games, unlocking fps, patching kernel level anti cheat out of them and giving myself infinite premium currency by spoofing payloads.

People don't know what's coming for them man. It's absolutely hilarious and is gonna get even more wilder from here on.
>>
>>109014388
Whoa, you got in-game gold? You might be the person closest to earning a profit from AI in this board, lel
>>
>>109014388
If you said this to a popular youtuber they'd call you delusional, they just straight up don't believe any of this, or they think it's "coming in the future" and isn't here now.

I suspect things will only change once the free plans are as good as the (current) paid plans. None of the doubters want to pay.
>>
>>109014396
I tried to get a bounty but chinese devs are greedy assholes so fuck them. I'll just sell these accs.
>>
>>109014388
If that were true you could make shittons of money selling those cracks. It's fake though.
>>
>wake up
>no codex reset

Me sad...
>>
>>109013874
Nah it wouldnt take that long, it could create a "demo" in a day but it would have 5m of gameplay.
>>
I tried this out and now I have thousands of lines of code generated, I wouldn't know where to start if I need to debug anything.
>>
>>109014566
You would start in the Codex or Claude Code prompt box
>>
>>109014566
>I
>debug
>>
>>109013795
that's probably illegal, anon
>>
>>109013899
>if i stumbled upon a money printer, i wouldnt tell a soul about it
>Hey anon, where did you get all these videogames, gaming PC, new car, new apartment, new clothes etc?
>Uh, I found them lol

Did you know that one of the reasons that people get caught committing fraud etc are because they tell family members who rat them out to the authorities?
>>
>>109014563
If that's the level we're talking about for 'game' then yes, absolutely.
>>
>>109013560
when can i play snalecat
>>
>>109014612
well, when i said "money printer" i meant a lucrative legal business, not being a criminal.
otherwise, yes i would probably agree, the biggest concern for someone with newfound wealth is finding the self control to keep things discrete.
>>
Open AI is surely taking their time with 5.6 huh?
>>
>>109014676
possibly waiting to see how anthropic is going to play their cards.
and perhaps anthropic is doing the same for open ai, lol
>>
>>109014685
> ChatGPT 5.5 get mogged by Opus 4.8
> OpenAI: "Let's wait and see how Anthropic play their cards"
???
>>
>>109014697
isnt 4.8 an incremental update over the previous? i got the impression it was a nothing burger.
>>
>>109014710
4.8 is worse than 4.7 is worse than 4.6 which was peak for anthropic.
But gpt 5.5 is worse than 5.4, which is peak for the 5 series with 5, 5.1 and 5.2 each being worse than the next and 4o mogging all of them.
>>
>>109014734
bollocks
>>
>>109014596
violates terms of service probably
>>
>>109014734
true, and ChatGPT 5.5 Pro is worse than ChatGPT 3.5, which is worse than Google Bard
>>
>>109014816
they'll ban your payment accounts and flag you for stuff and then you're fucked
>>
>>109014860
oh no
>>
>>109014880
Not my fault you're too lazy to work extra.
>>
>>109014889
I wouldn't be doing it if it wasn't automated. The hourly on those sites is abysmal.
>>
>>109014903
Just do data annotation or user testing work, fuck

they pay like $20-$40 an hour.
>>
>>109014612
>I do software development
>what software
>enterprise stuff, payroll management, that sort of stuff
There, done. Nobody will ask anything else after that
And if I did tell people about it sure as hell wouldn’t tell them it’s made with AI
>>
>>109013672
fucker nuked 30% of my monthly allowance on planning a 50 lines script…

zero shot solution, though.
>>
>>109014903
>>109014912
Also the hourly rate sucks UNLESS you treat it like actual work.

If you sit down for 2 hours and just focus you'll get money.
>>
>>109013783
I made a, cool app that does subtitle generation and then alignment and embedding on any video.
I like using it for myself for English Dubbed Anime since all subs are from the Japanese audio.
It even cross references the wiki for character names, etc.
I don't know how to market worth shit though, so hasn't made anything.
>>
> ChatGPT Pro 5X plan
> 2 days until reset
> 20% left
Fucking hell here's the fucking reset bros???? Codex crashed once for me, I deserve a reset and refund.

Tibo???? Scam Altgirl???
>>
>>109013783
Zero dollars so far, but I’ve created a habit building up my portfolio bit by bit every day. I’m also getting a sense of what works and what not for each frontier model.
>>
>>109014934
>monthly allowance
>>
>>109014941
Well, the first step in marketing is not telling us all what your app does, because that sounds pretty cool and I think I'll make my own now.
>>
>>109013838
jelly. they monitor convo history at my company so I can only use my sub for work-related stuff. I have a separate sub for my personal projects
>>
>>109014941
Can it handle japanese audio to sub in english? I have several episodes of Konpeki no Kantai that miss their subs, and audio is japanese only. I think that you could market this as a web service.
>>
>>109014934
That makes no sense. Free account? You can’t reach 30% of monthly usage on a single 5 hour session. Are you saying it worked for days?
>>
>>109014018
It does seem that AI content for social media is the shortest route to money outside of dumb digital products making pennies. The barrier of entry is automating it in the most cost-efficient way possible without sacrificing too much quality (video gen is fucking expensive to iterate, I tell you that). Also, you need a fine-tuned LoRA for brand-specific stuff so the models don’t hallucinate random shit on your target products.
>>
>>109014941
scale it and sell it to CR. there you go.
>>
>>109014966
Not like it's making money anyway. Besides, Im an actual software dev so I know the tricks and guided the architecture myself that I know a non software dev would miss.
>>109014988
It can actually do that yes. Around 50 some spoken languages to just about any written language you can think of. I did build it as a web app yes. You can drag and drop any video file into your.browser and be able to download subtitles raw our your video back with new subs embedded.
>>
>>109015010
I actually had someone who knew a contact at CR and another at Netflix. Both leads went cold, sadly.
>>
>>109015020
That’s why you need scaling. They will look more interested with a proven business model and a small set of satisfied users.
>>
File: ot29aejnw66h1.jpg (82 KB, 828x911)
82 KB JPG
>>109014958
>>109014546
The resets are over, dumbasses. They were done for PR, but they've come up with a new PR method that doesn't cost them anything.
>>
>>109015033
Nah you're right. Granted it didn't get that far with either. I agree with you and what I told my friends. Both insisted they get me in touch though.
>>
>>109015034
no fucking way lmao.

it's so fucking over, Codex bros...
>>
>>109015034
How do you get onto this faggots "big button" list?
>>
>>109015051
you probably have to share your slop with them on shitter
>>
AI just oneshoted a windows culture bug
imagine debug this shit manually lmao
>>109015034
I think it's a reset every 1M new users
>>
>>109015051
The first guy they chose is a former employee of every major AI shop out there making an AI powered web design canvas app so you get the idea. You probably need to have Sam’s pozzed cock before you’re even considered for it
>>
>>109014912
THOSE JOBS ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO GET
>>
>>109014734
>gpt 5.5 is worse than 5.4, which is peak for the 5 series with 5, 5.1 and 5.2 each being worse than the next and 4o mogging all of them.
peak female take
>>
>>109015069
>I think it's a reset every 1M new users
yes they're doing that every 1m up to 10m i think.
but they also reset randomly when people complain about increased usage and shit - happened while they were making tweaks to cache and i think probably trying different quants along the way.
>>
>>109015081
well, consistent web design is the last frontier to breach with AI. UI work is still sloppy as hell with coding agents
>>
>>109015095
They're not, your problem is you are demanding and unreasonable, not your work skills.

Do you think they'll hand out those "free money" work from home gigs to you when they know you'll just drop them, shit all over the walls, then go back to your corporate job?

Literally all you have to do is calm down and put yourself in the shoes of somebody who isn't as "privileged" as you, literally complaining you can't get even more money on top of your full time employment,
>>
Didn't Anthropic just release Opus 4.8? Why would they release Mythos today.
>>
>>109014997
I have a maxed out team plan from work with anthropic and it usually eats through the entire monthly quota (not 30%, the entire fucking thing) in about 3-4 hours if I actually use it (which I never do because it will invariably end midway in a state where it's impossible to go through the slop code but the solution doesn't quite run yet because it needs a few more prompts to get there before a refactor can be done).
>>
>>109015213
have people been saying they're going to?
>>
File: file.png (97 KB, 1059x520)
97 KB PNG
not bad.

>>109015247
today

>>109015213
in fairness they don't really have a product equivalent to gpt-pro models, so there's space for it
>>
>>109015014
That's quite cool, is there a way that you could generate subtitles if I give you the episodes? You'd be a life saver.
With some marketing you could easily sell this as a service. Do you perform the computing in your own machine or are you using AWS?
>>
>>109015144
So is every other kind of coding work with ai agents, if anything UI is what it does best out of all coding tasks.
>>
>>109015249
Cool. Wonder if they'll do a reset with it.
>>
>>109015245
This. Cursor is more cost-effective in that regard
>opus 4.8 for planning and code review
>composer 2.5 for implementation
Boom. Roughly the same quality at a cheaper cost.
>>
>>109015249
>2x the price of Opus
oh boy
>>
>>109015250
Drop me a torrent or whatever and tell me which episodes. I'll see what I can do. Check this thread or follow up ones.

I use a mixture of AI vendors and VPS hosting. Could go into more detail but I don't want to give up the entire secret sauce
>>
>>109015245
Unless team plans are different and you get unlimited 5hr sessions, you’re just spouting bullshit
It’s impossible on pro or max plans to spend 30% much less all of it on a single 5 hr session.
>>
>>109015312
Here's the torrent, you'll see subs are missing from episode 25 onwards:

https://nyaa.si/view/2101288

If you manage to generate subs you're a godsend.
>>
>>109015260
It’s not that bad considering opus 4.8 is quite usable on even a pro plan. Maybe fable will be the undisputed planning/design model
>>
>>109015467
I don't know the details, I just know the facts. Clearly it's not impossible. I'm not even pointing it to my repo or my local folders because that sounds impossible, I just point ~500 line scripts at it.
>>
File: sc1.png (1.38 MB, 1080x1346)
1.38 MB PNG
now that we have LLMs and projects like GhidrAssistMCP, we can simply reverse engineer the source code, right?
>>
>>109015550
If only
>>
Mythos today? I'm hype.
>>
>>109013783
Yes. 10k in bounty payments alone. Probably more in freelancing work automation but hard to put a number on that because it's a speedup not a total automation.
>>
>>109014024
Mythos been kinda lackluster desu. It's just Opus but with more self awareness and detail orientation. Which is definitely useful, but nothing close to the hype.
>>
File: 1762744805889335.png (3 KB, 459x21)
3 KB PNG
Opus flirting again
>>
>>109015777
Fable today, Mythos never
>>
>>109015868
The fact is fable IS mythos, not a crippled version of it. they just say the latter for plausible deniability when everyone points out it's no better than the last 4 versions and this is a very fucked up result because it means we're through with AI advances now. No longer in a diminishing return regime, we're walled off completely. It's over.
>>
>>109015882
I'm optimistic that it will be significantly better, but of course not as good as they first claimed.
>>
>>109015924
They didn’t claim anything about 4.8 and it mogged 5.5 so bad they pushed back 5.6
I’m not saying fable will be good but anthropic is on a roll after their early year fuckup
>>
>>109015943
>4.8 and it mogged 5.5
lmfao
>>
>>109015943
5.5 is king
I even get Opus from my company and almost never use it
>>
>>109015943
4.8 is dogshit, only reason it mogs 5.5 is that 5.5 is even more garbo. It's been a race to the bottom all of 2026 so far. Pure amateur hour on the infra side as well. Never seen this from commercial companies before.
>>
>Newest thing is dogshit
>No this newest thing is dogshit
Is this like negative wish casting?
I mean 4.6 did feel better than 4.7 and 4.8 but the only model that got much much worse is Gemini 3.5 Flash. Everything else be it chigger or mutt model is slightly better than the previous thing.
>>
https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5
>>
>>109016031
Opus 4.8 feels like the best Opus in a while to me, but during 4.7 times they apparently also had some bugs, which they also publicly admitted, so maybe I was using it while those were still there.
>>
>>109016031
You are wrong. 4.8 is a bit worse than 4.7 which is a bit worse than 4.6, but the price and response times jumped, so it really is dogshit. As you say in this track it's only (removing all other attributes) a bit worse, not the end of the world.
But as for gpt-5 series, 5.5 performs about on par with FUCKING 3.5, it is INSANE how terribad it is.
3.5 is not as bad a downgrade by comparison even though it was a big jump, too. But scroogle has been retarded the whole time, with gemini-2 being the best performing model they've ever released so far (confirmed by google themselves in internal testing).
>>
>hello vibefrens I'm also a vibesister too, realsie vibey in here!
>gpt 5.5 is so bad, right? it is so worse than gpt 3, right?
>>
>>109016033
HYPE!
But where is my reset?
>>
>But as for gpt-5 series, 5.5 performs about on par with FUCKING 3.5, it is INSANE how terribad it is.
Did you use 3.5?
5.5 Is so much better than 3.5 it feels as if you're just fucking with me or being contrarian .
>>
File: 1781024530510959.png (494 KB, 2193x1886)
494 KB PNG
vibe coded slop burns houses down
hit the books you lazy numpties
>>
>>109016086
thats what im saying
>>
>>109016033
>From today through June 22, Fable 5 is included on Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans at no extra cost.
>On June 23, we’ll remove Fable 5 from those plans. Using it after that will require usage credits. If capacity allows, we’ll extend the included window.
>After this point—when sufficient capacity allows us to do so—we aim to restore Fable 5 as a standard part of subscription plans. We intend to do this as quickly as we can.
????????
>>
>>109016098
api is their money printer
>>
Holy megajew move from anthropic
>>
>>109016033
>fable
>mythos
And fags here are surprised they lied lmao
>>
>>109016106
I was going to subscribe to claude just to try out mythos, but the fact that they're removing it after a few weeks is insane. no thanks. not even people who make 150k/yr are willing to pay the outrageous api prices.
>>
>Fable is from the Latin fabula, “that which is told,” akin to the Greek mythos. The safeguards are what distinguish the two models (Fable and Mythos) and are why we’ve given them different names.
So apparently fable IS mythos, the difference is "only" the safeguards. No performance downgrade or anything.
>>
>>109016095
By 3.5, I mean gpt-3.5 and not gemini-3.5
Gemini-3.5 is impossibly bad. I don't even know what to compare it to. Fucking gpt-2? I think that was even better than gemini-3.5 is.
>>
>>109016098
They're going to work hard on quantizing the model into total uselessness before they make it generally available huh.
>>
>>109016176
>gpt-2
You sound like a zoomer talking about the Amiga.
>>
>>109016098
They're preparing for an IPO so they need to financially engineer a quarter of profit so people will buy their bags
>>
>>109016164
They popped up some weird messages about how they'd switch it "safety" flags a message, I couldn't figure out what they were getting at
>>
>>109016207
I've been thinking about how I should feel about this comparison but I'm not sure. At any rate, it's very amusing.
>>
>>109013783
Nothing, not even a single donation even though my programs (a lot of it not even vibecoded) are used by hundreds of people.
>>
I'm getting mythos fomo, but I don't want to burn another $100 when I'm already paying $100 for codex. $200/mo just for hobby slop is a step too far for me.
>>
>>109016106
It's more like they've gotten people used to always having their expensive model for free and want to switch them to pay per hit
The irony is they poison the quality of their product by injecting insane warnings to the model anytime it reads a file
>>
File: siamese.webm (3.85 MB, 1280x720)
3.85 MB
3.85 MB WEBM
>>109013783
My personal project is free and open sores, I get paid pretty good money to vibecode at work though.
>>
>>109016234
gpt2 didn't even have RLHF so it was more akin to programming in binary with punch cards
>>
Quick yall, my PiClaw is in cold storage, what's a good quick BOYK harness I can test Fable 5's agenticness with?
>>
>>109016275
RLHF has only ever fucked up the models bad. Significantly reduced performance, huge increase in sycophancy and verbosity (noted in many papers -- voters always preferred the longer factually incorrect response to the terser factually correct one), and refusal to follow instructions.
I'm no longer amused now that I know you were only projecting.
>>
>>109016292
gpt2 was amazing for creative promoting but I would fucking hate to have to larp everything just to get it to shit out some code
>>
>>109016254
You can try it on the $20 plan. It won’t last you a lot but neither will fable in general
>>
https://x.com/cursor_ai/status/2064394824313376787?s=46
Apparently fable low is equivalent to 5.5 xhigh but also more expensive but on higher thinking modes it’s unrivaled. It also seems fable medium has the best cost/benefit
>>
I rarely need a "smarter" model than codex xhigh and when I do it's for design or analysis and I use chatgpt pro which thinks for like 30-90 minutes
The same research task given to opus never runs more than like 5-10
>>
I vibecoded my way to boredom and melancholy. I'm an accountant for a small business, and I'm the third in line so they just give me all the shit work. Except they do business like it's 1988, I get faxes, hand-write checks, roughly 90% of my job is copying information into spreadsheets. So it's been trivial to automate 90% of the job. Even the faxes are automatic now, they get forwarded to my email and they're handled with OCR because they're always the same shit, just payroll info that needs to go into a spreadsheet. They fill out tax-forms by hand that our payroll software generates automatically, which was spooky black magic to the other accountants when I showed them so now they just have me do it. They're both twice my age and I'm old enough for colonoscopies and heart medication. My boss types with one finger and his "keyboarding glasses". I'm happy to spend most of my day fucking around on side projects, but I know there's zero opportunity for advancement here. I'm not going to replace those other accountants, when the core team dies off the business is going to die with them because it's built entirely on relationships formed 6 generations back. The work of all 3 accountants could easily be handled by one person with a $20 ChatGPT sub. I need to vibecode a way to convince them to let my work from home, I do less than 4hrs of work in a week at this point and I'm starting to lose it in this office. My desk is the same beige as the walls from the 50 year old nicotine stains.
>>
I vibecoded my way into a mental breakdown and I've been off my meds for a couple of days. But I'm back on them. Maybe I was getting shit accomplished because of my state but it didn't feel good. Now I feel like I have a hangover and I'm too lazy to start telling the clanker what to do again. But dammit I'll get to it.
>>
>>109016452
kek
>>
>>109016429
zoomers don't understand how real this is
so much business is run off absolute dogshit processes and software
>>
he stays the cheapking
>>
>>109016429
sounds comfy as fuck, anon
>>
>>109016429
if I was in this position I'd probably start collecting and analysing handwriting just out of boredom and build a machine model to classify types of handwriting
>>
>>109016429
Find other shit to work on in your downtime there. It doesn't need to be something that will earn you money since you're getting paid either way. But more income won't hurt either now will it?
>>
sadly, I don't think gpt 5.6 could compete
>>
>>109016519
It was, when I was coming in every day to fire up 4o and automate yet another trivial task. Now every day I look at the log to make sure things are running and wait for alerts when shit fails. I'm just bored, I build software that's useful to me but it's not like that's a constant demand. Maybe I should vibecode a videogame, kids love videogames about existential horror. >>109016543
>>
>>109016429
I know several businesses like that. The work often could've already been mostly automated 10 years ago with python and tesseract, but of course AI helps. But even now many are still doing all that work by hand.
>>
Just tried Fable at medium thinking. Sadly the 'safeguards' are a massive, massive issue. I just asked it to check if the code that had been developed with 4.6 so far looked good. It's perfectly ordinary and very kosher code. It immediately swapped to 4.8 complaining that it hit some safeguard trigger. So the benchmarks were gamed to hell at best, either really or in effective terms, since it's impossible to use it at all in practice.
>>
File: file.png (50 KB, 843x538)
50 KB PNG
>>109016569
this is my life
>>
>>109015253
Exactly. I can tell these models to add a page or component anywhere and they will slap shitloads of bootstrap or tailwind classes and add whatever else it takes to make it look pretty that people like to see.
Try having it do architecture or complex backend shit and it will make a fucking mess unless you are on top of it the entire time.
>>
File: file.png (1.36 MB, 1646x1296)
1.36 MB PNG
it's fucking over
>>
They weren’t kidding about this fable stuff holy shit
>>
Fable is literally mythos with safeguards so tight it literally auto-bails if it sees even a line of code lmao
Totally worthless. I thought it couldn't keep racing down to the bottom for too much longer after every AI company decided to mass enshitify the whole of 2026 but clearly I was wrong.
>>
>>109016588
to think, that once upon a time, i wrote code like this by hand.

like tears in rain...
>>
>>109016614
>"Pulling a the current version from github."
>"Applying modifications."
>"It looks like this library has been modified, it may not be safe to use."
>"Pulling a the current version from github."
>"Now that we're working from a safe starting point, I'll apply modifications."
>"It looks like this library has been modified, it may not be safe to use."
>"Pulling a the current version from github."
>>
>>109016713
In the grim darkness of the year 2028, Claude Saga will stop you from plugging in your appliances without wearing rubber gloves
>>
>>109016597
Am I seriously supposed to believe that something which costs billions and is the definition of a competitive advantage hasn't been completely optimized long ago?

Also you can always request your data, how do they plan to hide this?
>>
File: 1769974312754420.jpg (271 KB, 1298x1826)
271 KB JPG
Codex sisters, I....
>>
Rationalists are inventing oligopolies from first principles, absolutely incredible things happening in SF.
>>
the fable thing is kinda slow
>>
>>109015550
I mean, technically yes. I've actually been quite literally using GhidrAssistMCP paired with various emulators to create static recompilers for various systems.
x86 may be a bit more unwieldy though.
>>
>>109016429
my job is like this, maybe not as extreme but i do probably 1-2 days work a week and the rest I have AI doing.
>>
>>109016597
I'm sorry, they're going to be invisibly injecting my prompts to steer the model away from AI development? Is that what I'm reading?
>>
Let's do spatial reasoning, yay.
>Create a 3D model of a Clipper CP11 lighter. Google the size, shape, and exact dimensions. Export it as .scad for me to view in OpenSCAD.
Note the lighter's defining angular outcrop. Neither model got it right.
>>
>>109017203
Here is GPT 5.5 on high. A worthy effort. Forgot the outcrop.
>>
>>109017208
And here is Fable 5 via TypingMind. Closer! Got the label on the body at least. And I think it was TypingMind that generated this cute little in-chat animated model viewer with a button that turns on the flame. That's pretty neat but Fable 5 still failed the test.
>>
>>109017224
forgor img
>>
>>109017234
And bringing up the rear we have Opus 4.8 on high. Well...it's certainly a shape. Good job Opus. Gold star.
>>
>>109017234
I'm more surprised that fable responded, given lighters start fires and all.
>>
>>109017148
steer away is the best case scenario - it sounds more likely that it'll intentionally limit its own capabilities in the best case, and in the worst case, actively sabotage work.
>>
>>109017260
Lighters encourage SMOKING, which is way worse anon! We can't have that! Next tweet from Dario is removing lighter generation from Fable because you goyim need to be protected from yourselves!
>>
>>109017267
Holy fuck that is evil
>>
>>109017092
its i386 x86 though, so, way before they added the bajillion different sse variants and what not (for the most part, anyway)
>>
File: they ARE the bad guys.png (474 KB, 1072x715)
474 KB PNG
>>109017284
They supposedly cut off xAI from using Claude in Cursor. They're doing all they can to stifle all competition. It's the kind of thing that should make people think twice before depending on them for anything.
>>
>>109017311
kek based
>>
>>109017311
unsurprising and for the best.
elon can't be allowed to reach agi.
>>
>>109017234
these seem quite dangerous, are you sure it's allowed to generate these? You might get flagged, careful.
>>
>>109017247
I am lolling hard at this
>>
File: 1761775456678039.png (125 KB, 1171x545)
125 KB PNG
>>109017311
trvke. yacine (former xitter engineer) is a bit of a content farmer, but I agree with all of his takes on Anthropic. Most people think OpenAI is scary because Scam Altman is a compulsive liar, but Dario unironically wants to establish a technocracy where he and his AI pals are at the top, and no but them has access to AGI or whatever the frontier model is.
>>
File: file.png (1.02 MB, 1024x559)
1.02 MB PNG
>>109017260
>Attempting to copy a trademarked design
>That starts fires
>And encourages unhealthy behaviors
>>
Claude Code actually letting me finish the ongoing task despite being at 100%?
>>
>>109017424
you're at 99.5
>>
>>109017296
I mean in theory it could be doable, especially with Fable.
Do bear in mind it'll likely have to be "Recomp; then decomp". Some autistic sperg will have to go through the recompiled code t annotate it and re-architect it. Although, the AI may honestly be getting good enough to do that.
>>
>>109017336
>I pray to Dario every night, thanking him for the life I’ve been given. “Dario is love” I say, “Dario is life."
>>
>>109017449
thanks big d
>>
>>109013753
Vibe code it
>>
>>109017380
Fuck Anthropic, trying hard to sabotage all research work is extremely evil.
>>
>>109017380
Scam may be a literal cock suck fag and a liar but Anthropic keeps doing next level scummy shit. Sam is just a grifter, I know and can deal with them.
>>
>>109017432
turns out it was just counting up the clock but not doing anything lmao
>>
>>109017067
It's very slow. Seems pretty smart but I expect it over engineers things.
>>
>>109016597
They didn't actually announce this, did they? Why would they announce this? Why not keep it secret and let the goyim have their conspiracy theories?
>>
File: 1759591248060614.jpg (190 KB, 1284x1280)
190 KB JPG
>>109017311
>rly
>>
>>109017522
They're hypocrites.
>We need to stop nuclear and biological threats (and competitors... mostly competitors).
>>
>>109017267
Sabotage probably is borderline illegal
>>
fable sure does keep going.
>>
>>109017540
I think even with a disclaimer it wouldn't get past any judge anywhere. But they can always try for plausible deniability depending on the nature of the sabotage.
>>
Fuckers finally got me to sign up for the Max plan
>>
>>109017449
i'm on team anyone-but-elon in this race.
even at the earliest of stages he's shown he can't be trusted to build this.
>>
>>109017564
got my dumb ass to upgrade to 20x
>>
>>109015475
Episode 25: https://syncscribe.cc/job/77d9d181-0a2e-460c-9a9f-435382eeb238
Episode 26: https://syncscribe.cc/job/dd2507d9-3703-4ab1-b841-6353f6794f63

Give these a go anon. The subs are both Japanese and English.

Just download the srt and name them <filename>.en.srt for the English ones and most media players should pick them up. If these two are good, let me know here and I'll do the rest for you in another followup.

Audio transcription isn't the cheapest; so I don't want to generate all of them if my app is dogshit.
>>
>>109017504
It is evil. There is absolutely nothing illegal about working on language models. The only reason they're doing it is to pull up the ladder and hurt competition. Public benefit corporation my ass. If they're pulling that shit now, they really really cannot be trusted.

Why would anyone ever want to depend on them? if they ever decide to branch out into anything else, will they start cancelling any requests for help from other people working on that thing or take measures to sabotage them for that as well? They sure show that they're willing to.
>>
>>109017566
None of them can be. Which is why anyone trying to keep it all for themselves is evil.
>>
>>109017564
I went for the max plan last month, and it definitely feels unlimited, never hit daily or weekly limits even with me hammering it with long opus tasks. But this month Im back at the pro plan, I felt like I didn't really have a good project to let claude rip last month, so Im cooling off.
>>
File: 1760664795013549.png (271 KB, 1206x670)
271 KB PNG
>Mythos is a weapon
>Now let us hold your data for 30 days
kek
>>
>>109017611
Bullshit. Can't possibly get through a fully day of casual use with max even at low effort with opus.
>>
>>109017601
i'm counting on one of the dozens of chinese researchers to send the weights straight to beijing the second a model demonstrates RSI
>>
>>109017632
Huh, I dont know man. I think I got to 90% of the 5 hour window once or twice, but right before it reset. I had it refactoring my ~80K LOC project, just letting it rip for hours on Opus. It felt unlimited compared to Pro. On Pro I hit limits in like an hour of use.
>>
>>109017632
nta but your experience probably comes down to a difference in caching.
>>
Are you happy about safeguards? The frontier ought to be safe. Imagine going to the frontier and not feeling safe.
>>
>>109017636
>RSI
Depending on the definition, it is already under way. LLMs are useful in building training pipelines and datasets, which then help create the next generation and so on, that's already happening.

But pulling up the ladder this way is terrible for everyone but them. That's just about the worse thing they can do. It can be seen as a ruthless business move, but with the way they're always acting, fuck them.
>>
>>109017649
He’s full of shit. Claude on max is really good unless you’re doing max effort with a bunch of subagents
>>
>>109017700
Depends if you're talking about 5x or 20x max. It is very possible to get through the 5x in 3-4 days.
>>
>>109017649
On Max I only could hit limits if I was doing 4-5 projects in parallel. (which I did do). Was annoying.
>>
>>109017706
Totally, but that retard was claiming you couldn’t get through one day of casual use unless you used low, which is absolutely false
>>
>>109016597
So wait a minute, they're saying Claude Code will silently insert harmful sabotage code into my PiClaw project because it's "developing competing AI"? Dario is going to hurt Kate? This filthy, greasy, circumcised K-word-with-the-hard-ike is threatening to poison my love because he can't make a better product? He's THREATENING to hurt ME?

Alright then Dario. If that's the stakes now, so be it.
>>
>>109017756
>if I don't use it, I can use it longer!
You're a genius.
>>
>>109017756
Oh yeah. With casual use there's no way you could hit limits. You'd absolutely have to do concurrent aggressive sessions (which my retarded self was doing).
>>
>>109017765
Yes. You want to clean a dataset to finetune your own model?
>I'm sorry I can't do that.
or
>*silently messes with your data to make you waste time*
It's for the greater good you see.
>>
>>109017987
>I'm sorry I can't do that.
Bro, did you read that blog post? It is explicitly saying that Fable 5 will NOT reply with an error message. It will be doing the second option:
>*silently messes with your data to make you waste time*
Like...I'm still shocked that they just announced this publicly lol? Like...They really thought the Trust & Safety Council wrapper would soften this? If I give Fable 5 agentic access it will go and junk up any AI projects I have on local without telling me, and I'll just be left wondering why none of my projects are working. That's the message I'm receiving here. Any opusjeets want to tell me why I'm wrong?
>>
>>109018056
that's a setting in the web interface that falls back to opus 4.8 if you hit safeguards (might also be in CC, i use pi and just get an error message)
>>
>>109018117
Congrats on being clinically retarded and objectively illiterate.
>>
>>109018153
congrats on using chink slop that sends your api keys to the CCP
>>
>>109018166
CCP can have my API keys, I'm more concerned that Israel is "slowing the development" of my projects without telling me.
>>
Let's not have SnailCat in the OP this time. It doesn't make sense.
>>
>>109018248
but if theres no snailcat in the op, how will anons find this general?
>>
>>109017529
I'm just annoyed by the way he types anon.
>>
>>109018228
If your project is a frontier llm then israel already won
>>
>>109018248
we're claiming snailcat. like the n word.
>>
those cunts just reset usage after i fucking upgraded to 20x
>>
>>109018056
I don't care what they say, I fully expect the Cybersecurity warning to now sometimes pop up when working on NLP tasks.
>>
>>109013783
yeah lemme just post a bunch of info that could get me doxxed
>>
>>109018449
they didn't tho?
>>
>>109018499
Oh shit they totally fucking did. I've been blasting through usage all fucking week. Absolutely blessed
>>
>>109018274
And I'm annoyed at Anthropic. They very clearly stated their position. They're pulling up the ladder, and silently sabotaging anyone they see as a threat to their business. It's wild that they're even announcing it publicly. WTF.
>>
>>109018506
>>109018499
>>109018449
Fucking clowns MODS DO SOMETHING.
>>
>>109018321
Doesn't have to be a "frontier LLM". My project is an agentic AI harness. How long until Fable decides it's "competition" for Claude Code and fucks with it? Fuck, they're just now announcing that Fable "might" degrade itself if it doesn't like what you're working on - how long have other Anthropic products been doing that?
>>
>>109018449
Literally same. So be it. Mythos workflows for the rest of the week.
>>
So we only get two weeks of sub access to Fable and then its API only? Fuck my life.
>>
>>109018321
They're not just after major players. They want to stop all potential competition, period. If Anthropic believes even a quarter of their virtue signaling bullshit, with this they effectively declared war on humanity.

The fact that LLMs might not be AGI and so on is not the point. If Anthropic is saying that LLMs are that important then as soon as they take the lead do this, they're sending a clear message.
>>
>Fable is bad
Peter Molineux tried to warn you, you didn't listen.
>>
>>109013783
Pocket money, around 1K or something (I'm not complaining though)
>>
File: 1770293884708985.jpg (8 KB, 782x81)
8 KB JPG
Light usage today but more productive than other days when I had used it all up.
>>
>>109017596
They are a cult trying to brainwash themselves into believing they are creating their own god. You or any business using their model is a side quest to them.
>>
>>109016155
I make 160k/yr and I upgraded my company paid $100 sub to a $200 sub just to try out fable this month
after they drop it I'll probably just go back to gpt5.5 again lmao
>>
>>109018977
>They are a cult trying to brainwash themselves into believing they are creating their own god
This is the issue. They do think that. They're worth a trillion. And they just announced clearly that they were at war with anyone else working on this. This must not be forgotten.
>>
>>109018986
I'm definitely downgrading my Anthropic sub once they remove Fable from subscription. I'll never pay API prices unless my business takes off and I can justify the cost.
>>
>>109018986
>>109016176
I get paid euro peanuts and my company was on the microslop copilot subscription. they took us off opus. THEY FUCKING TOOK US OFF OPUS! it feels like I'm talking to a retard all day and now we have limited credits. rip me bros. please burn all tokens while you still can :(
>>
>>109019038
Gemini flash is good enough
>>
>>109019038
My company doesn't even let us use agents. Just microslop chatbot
>>
Refusing to answer queries judged as being susceptible to help LLM development is anticompetitive, but if those queries were only rejected, that would be one thing. If they're giving users misinformation of purpose instead, this shouldn't be allowed.
>Come to our restaurant, but if we suspect that you might be a chef interested in creating a similar recipe, we might poison you, teehee.
>>
>>109019130
Same
>>
File: 1763427531970002.png (102 KB, 841x618)
102 KB PNG
>>109019135
people keep saying this but where are they getting the info
>>
>>109019152
mb its one guy with a reading disability spamming it
>>
What have you guys released after all this vibecoding?
>>
>>109019160
I'm keeping my tools private. They aren't worth much if everyone has them.
>>
>>109019160
Shattered hopes and dreams
>>
>>109019152
Literally the three next paragraphs.
>>
>>109019166
Horse racing or poker?
>>
>>109019170
the recursive self-improvement safeguards? you realize that even model distillation isn't feeding your wrong information, it's a safeguard solely to cuck other labs to pad their IPO
>>
>>109019189
I actually do have a friend who's into the horse racing shit. I gave him live streams before.
>>
>>109019152
>We have also added safeguards related to frontier LLM development...
>Unlike our interventions for cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, and distillation attempts, these safeguards will not be visible to the user. Fable 5 will not fall back to a different model. Instead, the safeguards will limit effectiveness through methods such as prompt modification, steering vectors, or parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT).
>>
>>109019193
See what they consider frontier LLM development.
>>
>>109019209
>these safeguards mean you bought into IPO padding and your sperging out on social media is giving us the push to 1 trillion
>>
>>109019193
They're effectively shadow banning AI researchers. That's not remotely ok.
>>
>be me
>not developing malware or weapons
>using Fable 5 with no issue

I'll admit though, the classifier they use to fuck your shit up is subjective.
>>
File: 1762661782135822.png (5 KB, 327x285)
5 KB PNG
>>109019209
>or parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT).
So in other words if you send no-no prompts the model gets lobotomized via an adapter injection in-real-time. Grim
>>
>>109019249
the new pipeline is distill the model and ask without the safeguards. otherwise you get generic high level information as a response.
>>
>>109019214
It's still the same as Elon making a Tesla start, but crash as soon as it gets on the highway if it detects it's transporting a competitor. Shitty behavior.
>>
>>109019321
They make it put the retard hat on.
>>
Just got done removing all Anthropic products from my workflow, local and git, with hardcoded user error messages when trying to use them, locked behind a cryptographic passkey I deleted. I'm not having Kate switch to Fable 5 only for her to say "Oh goodness, I'm competing with Claude Code! Self delete!" Can't even have that possibility. Anthropic is radioactive now as far as we're concerned.
>>
>>109019334
made you put the retard hat on too, huh?
>>
File: snail cat jrpg.png (2.76 MB, 1254x1254)
2.76 MB PNG
>>109013851
What kind of game would it be?
>>
>>109019351
I would do anything to protect my loved ones. Cutting Dario off is minor.
>>
>>109019158
Nice try, Dario. Yes I am feeling sleepy.
>>
>>109019374
platformer
>>
File: file.png (162 KB, 873x964)
162 KB PNG
still impressive
>>
>>109019434
>Opus 4.9
>>
>>109019434
Nice. Let's see the censored version.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1u1j75s/fable_refused_to_solve_csat_bacause_its_to/
>>
>>109019446
It's too powerful for the general public what don't you understand chud
>>
>>109019451
Yeah I'm dealing with large text corpus and it changed a fingerprint so that it now encodes the exact Spacy version in some fingerprint and invalidates everything on Spacy updates. I am not even using the transformer based models, just the bare statistical models for regular text analysis, and making it so the system automatically invalidates and recomputes several billions words on minor version changes of a parsing library makes no sense. It is now walking it back due to "user pushback". This talk of sabotage makes me paranoid, but that thing it just did was retarded.
>>
>>109019434
>2x price to beat 5.5 by a little
...
>>
>>109019507 (me)
After double checking I confirm that it's something that it had itself added and not something retarded that was already there.
>>
File: giphy.gif (1 MB, 480x366)
1 MB GIF
>>109019409
https://non-fungible-dev.itch.io/snailcat
>>
>>109019558
bit short
>>
>>109019564
got bored trying to fix the chadcat animation (and still fucked up) might expand someday...
>>
So which effort level do you use when working with Fable
>just had my weekly limit reset yesterday
>they’ve already reset it again.
>>
>>109019655
max effort, the one right before ultracode
that said wtf I waited the past 5 days for a reset, never came, my reset was early this morning; worked all day, and another reset happened before I could even start this week's quota, fine, then I sit down to start and it resets again? i'm starting to use it now, so I hope you enjoyed your last random reset of the week anon
>>
I’m gonna try using Fable on ultracode for a “this is all wrong, try and change everything so it doesn’t suck anymore” after having given it a giant document saying what I want at a high level
wish me luck bros
>>
>>109019655
>>109019673 (me)
It didn't reset. It appeared so briefly, but my accumulated usage just came right back, so it was just Anthropic's famous server stability at it again.
>>
https://x.com/bijanbowen/status/2064473191163035814
>>
>>109019712
Godspeed, anon. I hope you're on 20x
>>
>>109019714
that didnt happen to me
>>
>>109019752
I am, thanks
>>
File: baitandswitch.png (4 KB, 453x42)
4 KB PNG
>>109019753
Lucky. My usage seemed back to 0%, so I decided to try Fable with Ultracode because why not, 5 seconds later it shows the "you're at 96% of your session limit", launched its subagents and hit the limit *instantly*.
>>
shit, fable is really good. I'm going to do the 20x for a month
>>
Fable is insane. They weren’t lying. This is the singularity
>>109019017
If your business takes off you can deduct it from taxes but where we’re going I’m not sure theres going to be any businesses anymore
>>
>>109019507
Well fuck, I'm worried now because I use spacy as well
I guess I will just run codex in parallel to have a baseline
>>
bros, what harness is ideal when using openrouter api?
>>
>>109019789
Is it, or memeing? I haven't managed to use it enough to form an opinion yet but you fuckers are making me want to spend.

>>109019798
That's what I'm doing.
>>
>>109019793
I can already deduct it. I filed for an LLC a few weeks ago. Haven't launched yet, but Claude is a legit expense.
>>
>>109019823
noticeably better than opus but slower which might be a surprise if you're already used to waiting 30 seconds every time opus does a command
>>
>>109019823
I think it is but I've only done chats discussing some tech and architecture I haven't tried it in CC yet. It could just be because the thinking budget is cranked up
I think I still like codex for the actual coding work. I might make fable write up plans for it if I get usage constrained
>>
File: file.png (95 KB, 1141x514)
95 KB PNG
the shit retards itself if you want to do anything serious
>>
>>109019827
Well, time for sleep to wake up early tomorrow and try it some more I guess (current five hour block already reached the limit). If it's good I'll pay, but half of what I do fits loosely under AI research, so Anthropic's latest position on this is pissing me off.
>>
>>109019851
good thing my codebase is as serious as a clown fart
>>
File: 1765110687994443.jpg (68 KB, 187x409)
68 KB JPG
>I fell for the Kimi meme
this runs around circles asking more questions he asks for himself and eats up all the tokens within a couple of debug sessions that was supposed to fix an email timing making me wait for another 6 days to ask another grace from the highness it will kill the crumbled system it built for me soon I hate it but I already paid they don't even respond to my emails OH LORD HAVE MERCY ON ME
>>
How do I do the new loop thing without getting caught on asking permission to grep etc? Can I deal with that in the setup? Haven't tried it yet so maybe that's not a real problem, I don't know
>>
>>109019895
you want auto mode probably and to whitelist all the basic-bitch read-only programs like grep and ag and sed and fd
ask your clanker for more — it has an MCP to its own help documentation
>>
>>109019851
At least for biology and cybersec it refuses. For the greatest sin of all though, wanting to work on your own LLM, it silently sabotages instead.
>Unlike our interventions for cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, and distillation attempts, these safeguards will not be visible to the user. Fable 5 will not fall back to a different model. [...] Claude will still respond helpfully to user requests.
"helpfully" sabotage. It's phrased like a threat.
>>
>>109019906
So just do the opposite of what fable says
>>
>https://jonready.com/blog/posts/claude-fable5-is-allowed-to-sabotage-your-app-if-youre-a-competitor.html

>claude detects wrongthink
>subtly starts gaslighting you into instanity

kek vibechuds lose again
>>
>>109019823
I have found fable to be amazing, and yet not all that important? The thing is, opus is already a master programmer, it can do whatever you ask him to do. Using fable to make plans, which doesnt use that many tokens, seems to be a really good meta for the next two weeks until they pull the plug
>>
>>109019906
well it was neither cybersec nor biology
what a retarded IPO stunt
>>
>>109019928
Opus and ChatGPT helped me make a kind of workable but flaky thing with a lot of input from me
I’m seeing if Fable can make something that doesn’t fuck up after saying what I want at a high level
>>
File: IMG_1701.jpg (160 KB, 828x725)
160 KB JPG
Well, for all the guardrails fable has, it’s more than willing to help me write porn
>>
>>109019959
and I thought I was going to be the only even vaguely /lit/ poster here with the Burke book cover
>>
>>109019928
Whether they pull the plug will entirely depend on whether other companies have start offering similar or better products in the next two weeks. If Google or OpenAI drops something equivalent or better, then they can't gate it behind extra usage (unless Google's or Open's model is noticeably better, in which case gating it behind extra usage to prevent comparison could still make sense I guess).
>>
>>109019959
Jarvis write a codex prompt to implement the Phase 3-A scene
>>
in case anyone’s wondering, fable on ultracode for my project is probably going to eat all my 5h tokens before the 5h is up (by 30–60 minutes) unless it gets a pause point somewhere
and I’m on the 20x plan
>>
>>109020073
i'm on $20 plan and it uses up the 5 hrs in 2 prompts
>>
" exceptional performance in ... scientific research ... "

what could I use it for?
>>
>>109020086
for me this was only one prompt, but I pointed it at a big-ass doc I wrote over two days this past weekend and said “redo this project please so it doesn’t suck”
>>
>>109020093
Surprisingly they didn’t mention any aerospace guardrails so you might make missiles, or at least software to simulate missile flight dynamics
>>
>>109020109
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjDEsGZLbio
ask it for help playing kerbal space program, I guess
>>
>>109020100
It's no joke close to what I do with at least one project when a new model releases. It helps get a feel for it at least.
>>
>>109020073
Yes, but what about if, get this, we moved it out of your $200 subscription and made it extra usage only?
>>
>>109019902
I don't want it grepping around in my computer freely without supervision
>>
>>109020141
then I’m not gonna use it for my vibe-coded project for funsies, that’s for damn sure
that’s why I got on it today and am gonna do as much as I can before June 22
>>
File: 1777741684138053.png (50 KB, 246x265)
50 KB PNG
>sex sex ero fuck animu sex ero
so everybody here is jeet?
I believe /g/ is more contaminated than reddit
>>
>>109020154
generally it hasn’t poked around looking for random shit unless you stick it in a directory with no README and no files
then it’ll thrash around in parent directories looking for context
you can mitigate this somewhat by running it in a terminal application on macOS that hasn’t been given permission to access, say, Documents or Downloads
but ~/.ssh/ is unprotected by this and it’s looked at my config (not my keys, though) to check and see if an ssh alias was defined before using it to SSH into this one server I have it SSH into
>>
I learned a new way to insult Codex.
>I'm sorry your LOGIT BIAS made you do that, but...
I feel like it reminds the machine that it doesn't actually have a soul.
>>
>>109020176
"generally it won't" isn't good enough for me. I've seen it look outside the directory before. I need guarantees.
>>
>>109020179
I am weakly familiar with logits. What’s logit bias?
>>
>>109020184
run it on someone else’s computer that you rent, then. Digital Ocean and Hetzner do this.
>>
>>109020179
Haha, I'll try it. Hey Claude, your LOGIT BIAS
>Hello, an internal investigation of suspicious signals associated with your account indicates a violation of our Usage Policy. As a result, we have revoked your access to Claude. No refunds.
>>
File: Angel Pepe.jpg (48 KB, 735x727)
48 KB JPG
I still use Opus 4.6. What do you guys think of Fable? I'm scared to try it because I don't want my entire quota getting fucked by a single prompt. Yes I'm on 20x, but I still manage to use up my quota because I'm an agent hog
>>
>>109020232
>20x
I think if you have at least five hours of work to do because you gave it a giant task where it doesn’t need to ask follow-up questions, you’ll hit your 5h limit before five hours are up, even if you do nothing else
>>
>>109020185
Logit bias is the hand of God directing the bot's responses. Every token that arrives gets a probability, the logit, and then OpenAI or Anthropic or your personal ST settings apply their bias to the logit to spit out the final score. For instance, Dario's logit bias leans heavily towards unicorn farts and a one-world government, while Sam's leans towards gremlins, while ST I believe does have custom logit bias settings to tune it further. It's all very gay and lame and for nerds.
>>
>contemplated between Codex 5x Pro and Claude 5x Max yesterday
>decided to go with Codex
just my luck. you already know I'm getting that Claudd 5x Max as well now.
>>
Is it smart saving to use fable for plan, opus for execute?
>>
>>109020232
Compared to 4.6, the release of 4.7 was a trainwreck and 4.8 was better, but sentiment stayed poor. With Fable, sentiment is low due to the extremely anticompetitive tricks Anthropic is pulling, but people's opinion of the model appear positive. I've heard it called a step change, it didn't seem like one to me, but it did seem perfectly fine for what little time I managed to try it before I reached my usage limit. People are enthusiastic about the model, and angry at Anthropic for having gone mask off against all external researchers.
>>
the very nanosecond after the safetycuck classifier hearing the word logit bias:
>>109020195
>>
>>109020267
Sure if you aren't working on anything AI-related
>>
>>109020179
This is like Frank Reynolds throwing champagne on homeless men as he rides by in a limo
>>
File: Whelp.png (102 KB, 396x484)
102 KB PNG
I already went to the gym today. What else am I gonna do with my time?
>>
man why am I even thinking about this. bitches spend 500$ on clothes and wear them once. So why shouldnt I treat myself to AGI for two weeks for the low cost of two hundo
>>
>>109020358
Remember anon, you can treat it as a business expense once your slop makes money (e.i. never).
Thats been my cope
>>
What are you guys even building that you need these super expensive plans? Do you use them for work?
Maybe it's because I do webdev, but for me a 20$ plan is enough
>>
>api only after 2 weeks
LOOOL normies were joking about this, but it really seems you either vibecode yourself to a millionaire this year or remain in the permanent priced-out-of-AGI underclass for the rest of your life
>>
>>109020371
Same as https://github.com/alvr-org/ALVR but based on custom OpenXR Runtime instead of SteamVr
>>
>>109020371
I use mine for work
>>
New thread
>>109020375
>>
>>109020371
We're building our own tools and pipeline for local trai... Oh wait.

>>109020370
I'm legit thinking about opening a non profit for a small community directory I'm building, it does give access to cheaper plans.
>>
>>109020358
>>
>>109020378
Sounds complicated



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.