Remember that thread a few years ago where some guy was trying to Photoshop a picture of a woman to look like she was made out of stone? Dozens of anons took a stab at it and all of them fucking sucked, even ones made by seasoned designers. This was made by ChatGPT in less than 3 (THREE) minutes. Point being it's so fucking over for this field it's not even funny. >it even gave her some pokey nipples when I didn't even ask it toBOW TO YOUR AI OVERLORDS NOW!!!
original for reference
also>inb4 some sperg nitpicks a few things like the strands of hairnothing that even your grandma couldn't touch up with som app if they really cared enough (most people don't)
>>460845>...>Anonymous>07/19/25(Sat)15:11:09 No.460845> also> >inb4 someone with eyes points out how remarkably shitty this one is too and all I can do is REEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>460845https://willrobotstakemyjob.com/graphic-designers>Moderate Risk (41-60%): Occupations with a moderate risk of automation usually involve routine tasks but still require some human judgment and interaction. The number of 'Graphic Designers' job openings is expected to rise 2.5% by 2033
>>460843But it's not the same pose and looks different to the person?
>>460846>sperg starts sperging like clockworkMost people don't give a fuck + the tech gets better every day. Let's see your hand-made take (I already know it's gonna look as bad as all the ones from the old thread in 2019 or whatever)>>460848doesn't matter, even with slight inaccuracies it looks vastly better than anything that was hand-made on this board
>>460849it seems more like another tool for designers
>>460849>calls any and all critique of actual inconsistencies in the results "sperging">claims all previous non AI efforts "fucking sucked" but won't actually show them because he'd have to defend doing EXACTLY the same kind of critique he calls "sperging"> demands to see more non AI results so he can sperg out on them
>>460843>Dozens of anons took a stab at it and all of them fucking sucked, even ones made by seasoned designers> it's so fucking over >it's not the same pose and looks different to the person>people don't give a fuck >doesn't matter
>>460849>>460843>doesn't matter, even with slight inaccuracies it looks vastly better than anything that was hand-made on this boardtopkekbases his assumptions about the use of designers as a profession on what people upload to the weaving forum.what even is your metric? would a human also be allowed to co tribute an image with different pose and even person if you are fine with the AI doing it? did anyone try? your whole argument is shaky
>Can I commission you to make a picture of my pet.Sure I will use AI>But it doesn't look like my pet.WHY ARE YOU SPERGING.That's what you sound like man.
>>460843>>460844It looks nothing like the original
are the AI skeptics in this thread under the impression that the massive leaps in AI GD performance over the past five years will come to a grinding halt this year? I suspect none of you are high-level AI researchers, so I'm curious to see what your reasoning looks like. Unless, of course, you are on elephantine doses of copium.
>>460888>none of youthis board has been dead for years anon and even before that there was only one or two real designers here the rest are just newfags with pirated photoshop, also one of the main ai problems is owning the output result copyright, and recently there was an online poll and more than 80% of designers said they use ai either to generate ideas and speed up their workflow. right now the biggest problem for designers is not ai but those new companies that are offering unlimited designs for $5/month not even fiverr can compete with them
>>460888Recognizing that the OP is talking out of his ass and his entire premise is retarded isn't "AI skepticism"AI bros sound increasingly like the self driving car and alternative energy shills>just you wait > it will do everything promised> it will be unstoppable>everything will change forever>trust me nowOne thing that you and developers aren't considering (because developers never do) is that wirh creative tools many users don't need or want endless upgrades and perfection. >inb4 some sperg nitpicks a few things like the strands of hair>nothing that even your grandma couldn't touch up with som app if they really cared enough (most people don't)If thats the case why wouldn't the>massive leaps in AI GD performance over the past five years come to a grinding halt this year???People don't care that it's shit now meaning it's already good enough ...but just wait till it's so much better?Nobody cares.
>>460844terrible source gets you terrible results?
