Diaper girl thread 2.0Some faggot janny set the other diaper thread to autosage and now it can't be bumped. Move here when the other thread 404s.If jannies are going to delete this thread as a duplicate, then fix whatever the fuck has been done to the other thread.
Fucking trannitor has autosaged this thread too
>>2569377Take your disgusting fucking pedoshit back to plebbit WE DO NOT TOLERATE THIS EVIL SHIT HERE
>>2569455Someone needs a change...
>>2569455I usually wouldn’t reply to shitposts like this but I am amused by the implication that you will tolerate “pedoshit” on the Internet as long as it isn’t on a site you use lmao
>>2569455>Images of grown women are TOTALLY PEDO guys!
>>2569455>>2569474>Images of grown women are TOTALLY PEDO guys!This is the thing I don't get. Like it literally doesn't compute to me. You see this thread full of ADULT women. Big tits, juicy asses, everyone jerking off to attractive women. And yet somehow you think everyone here is still a pedo? It's fucking crazy.
>>2569574it's called projection, babyfucker gets hard seeing abdl and assumes since he got turned on being a pedo is the only reason to have a diaper fetish>>2569432as a troon, we do not claim jannies. they belong with the nonces
>>2569455yeah you do, fag. You tolerate it because it's fine and you can't do anything about it
>>2569455How fucking young and/or gay are you?There were regular diaper threads on /b/ 15 years ago. This was 4chan's favorite fetish because of how cute and cozy it was. People would post diapergirls in cozy gaming threads.You are an absolute faggot if you don't think these girls in diapers are cute.Massive, disgusting newfag energy.
Holy shit, you don't ALL need to reply to him. Just fucking ignore and move on.
>>2569879I'd love something new from her. Honestly still kinda pissed. It was quite a unique and good thing to have our own girl for such a niche thread
>>2569920I know.
>>2569931Obviously it's of no surprise that people in this fetish just can't act fucking normal and not harass posters but I still don't really understand it all.
>>2569879>>2569931There have been others.
>>2569951Like who
>>2569996Read the image, blindanon
>>2569951Why the question mark. And the watermark. Someone probably paid them to do it
>>2570027>Why the question markBecause it's a question?>diaper thread? :3Cutsie shit>And the watermarkBitches watermark theirs shit nowadays. Scotty always fucking bitched people would use her pics for more than just impersonating her, you can catfish people with unwatermarked picturesAbsolute cope
>captcha: POOPR
>>2570034Timestamps generally don't include a question mark. Was that all you got? Paywhores posting one or two pics with advertisement doesn't strike me as the same thing
>>2570056>Timestamps generally don't include a question markShe started the fucking thread with the image, she wasn't asked for a timestamp.You're acting so schizo over some diaper thot starting a thread with a cutsie message
>>2570058OK and the rest of the pictures she posted free and regularly as one of us? I'm not slating her really. Must be good advertisement
>>2570061Come on. She'd only have ended up doxed and slandered if she had done that
>>2570061>OK and the rest of the pictures she posted free and regularlyYou know the watermark is a twitter handle, you can go see her free content if you wantI'll never understand self-hating diaperfags like you. You're so obsessed with the idea of being some weirdo loner, almost like you cling to it. There couldn't possibly be women into diapers without being paid for every little thing!!!! When you're in a fetish that has literally hundreds of thousands of images uploaded for free to tumblr and twitter
>>2570069You're deliberately missing the point and making up your own narrative now. You claimed there was others like scotty. There wasn't. I don't give a shit if these girls are into it or not. It's porn. And if a girl advertises her porn on 4chan with one picture then I'm not going to act like she's one of us.
>>2570078Nail firmly hit on head.
>>2570078>You claimed there was others like scotty. There wasn't.Yes there are diaper girls who post on 4chan, I just happened to have that picture of one doing exactly that.You then went full 'tism tantrum mode and started raving about how she must have been paid to do so because she put a fucking question mark in a sentence on the timestamp
>>2570082I'm merely skeptical of one post from a girl. My point stands. Nothing like scotty. And judging by her lack of activity on all her diaper socials for years now she can't have been particularly into it. Straight up paywhore advertising. You're the one who started sperging about.. well this nonsense>>2570069
>>2570300>>There couldn't possibly be women into diapers without being paid for every little thing!!!!>>literal paywhore advertising one timeNever even claimed she wasn't into it but hey
>>2570303It's the implication of saying that her own reason to start a thread was to advertize and make money. If a femoid can't even post herself on 4chan for attention without you assuming there is financial gain, then she can't have fetishes either, because if she was just into it and did something cos she's into it rather than for money you could not be as certain as you claim to be
