Where did the notion that the anglos are ugly compared to their continental counterparts originated?
>>17962037when tanned became beautiful and pale became ugly
>>17962037We solved infant mortality while having a global cultural hegemon, without a core Platonic Ideal. It's totally unprecedented.This means we do indeed have more uggos and dysgenic libtards. Data proves this, because under Darwinian conditions those people would not reproduce with much success. Genes for obesity and infant mortality are strongly correlated, so we will have this in great number as well because we "solved" it first, those children did not die. They lived and reproduced. The pre-industrial Anglo was nearly a demigod, as was the Frenchmen, the Spaniard, etc because of this cultural-civilzational synthesis dating back to Rome for us, our civilizational forefather. You could just churn out legions of men good at not only making things but utterly solving material lack, and men capable at math, rhetoric and war who can forge it all at once. What we are expecting now is a racial canary in the coal mine because Anglos in particular are fundamentally eugenic. But because we have no core platonic ideal, we are subject to the platonic ideals of others, who are strictly opposed to our predilection for racial hygiene. Because we formed the global monoculture there is no way to "opt out" unless you recede into some type of intentional community. And what is happening now to us is also happening to all peoples of the earth simultaneously, almost at a rapid pace whether fertility is collapsing or not as problems are "solved" via the white man's means. We are unconsciously creating a more dysgenic planet, more obesity, more mutations, more this and that will all occur in all others genetically and has been. Anglos need to form a platonic ideal internally and hold firm to it, or we doom ourselves and all of mankind. And that platonic ideal must be racist.
>>17962037French stereotypes about anglos. It spread after the Napoleonic wars, but existed since at least the 1600's. There's also this weird persistent conception in France that English people eat raw meat, which I think is where the "Anglo food sucks" meme might originate from. >Raw meat makes animals fierce, and it would have the same effect on man. This is so true that the English who eat meat red and bloody, and not as well done as ours, seem to share more or less in the savagery due to this kind of food, and to other causes which can be rendered ineffective by education only. This savagery creates in the soul, pride, hatred, scorn of other nations, indocility and other sentiments which degrade the character, just as heavy food makes a dull and heavy mind whose usual traits are laziness and indolence.- La Mettrie, "Man a Machine."
your guy in the op looks like some evil ogre and you consider him top 0.01% of attractiveness lol
>>17962156I think he looks great
Meh
>>17962037>whererising tide of poo
>>17962091>because under Darwinian conditions those people would not reproduce with much successit is worse than you realize
>>17962626Nigga I'm not reading your word salads
>>17962037Probably has something to do with anglos being ugly as shit
>>17962917Anglos are not uglyAustralians are known to be hot
A rugby player (and these men are usually roided ogres no matter the race) is not the average example of white men
>>17962058Lack of sun and malnutrition. Your food is shit and your island is dim and covered in clouds. Australians look great.
>>17962037Its interesting because australians are generally deemed good looking.Maybe the high-risk criminal genes or just the sun
>>17963088Australians are fatter than Britons
>>17962037Reality
>>17964086Cope
>>17964094Yeah, I'm coping people think you are ugly, it's so hard to deal with the teeth jokes, the shitty weather and food, the norf memes, the hideous chav slags, etc. How will I handle all this cope?
>>17964103It's literally seetheralds at anglo hegemony
>>17964187Sure thing, sweetie, they are seething at your empire o algo
>>17962186>>17962037You're just a faggot lmao
>>17964336Nice projection
>>17962186What is this phenotype
>>17962904stay dumb then "nigga" kek
>>17964837Angloid
>>17964837Austroolian
>>17962037David Pocock is Rhodesian thoughbeit
Anglos are divided into 5 groups.Unlike continental europe, WHG and EEF were nearly wiped out by bell beaker around 3000 BC, possibly because the channel left them isolated and unprepared for an organized invasion unlike the opportunistic ad-hoc invasion of the continent. These were part of an Atlantic culture stretching to Iberia.This was followed by the Hallstatt culture in 1300-1200 BC, also indo-european but having mixed partly with fairer nordics, Britain was now part of the northern european world. These 2 groups comprise celtic DNA which ranged from swarthy dark haired welsh and "black irish" to pale gingers.The Romans left little DNA since they were a small minority of wealthy only there for tin and grain who preferred twinks, it was the anglo-saxons who came to settle that left the next significant mark, mostly in the southeast with further admixture in the rest of England and Scottish lowlands. This was followed by the genetically similar Vikings who were from modern day Denmark like the Jutes and Angles.The Normans left a small but significant impact on the anglo upper classes, who are a tangible entity to this day, though rapidly mixing due to globalization and modernity.Since the Romans the British have also been a refuge for "wild card" groups from the continent, some criminal, some honest innovators. This includes jews, though the England almost completely expelled Jews, they returned and thrived during the industrial revolution, there were also various merchants and travellers, these were some of the wealthiest jews also which led to judeophilia among the anglo.
>>17966409 BABBLE
