Do ethnocapitalists (nazis/fascists) and socially conservative libs not see anything wrong with their societies eventually morphing into dystopia shitholes like picrel? Is it considered trad? Or is this considered good for eugenics/La hispanidad race?
>>17962428Whoops. Wrong pic
>>17962428>Dystopia shitholes like places with fast mobile internetThe horror.Anyway. Most western right wingers and nationalists are not actually nazis or fascist, they would just prefer a democratic society that votes for the benefit and the continued existence of the white population. Very few are in favour of dictatorship, mass surveillance, chinese-style population control with social credit systems or stuff like that.
>>17962438How is that an effect of "ethnocapitalism" (not a word btw. please explain what you mean) or social conservatism?
>>17962446Not what I asked. And I'm not talking about contemporary politics.What did ethnocapitalists and libs have to say about their ethnostate's women and men being forced into prostitution for money?
>>17962455Capitalists strongly oppose welfare. Ethnocapitalists like nazi germany planner to limit welfare to promote strife and assure that the "strongest" survive.
>>17962470Not true, nazi germany did in fact increase welfare, for desirable people. Undesirables were to be prevented from breeding in the first place.You have a bit of a point about current day american republicans who would basically have americans live in squalor like the early modern underclass, barely sustaining themselves, but that's another matter.
China is a gooky shithole, not a true fascist society. When Franco spoke about la Hispanidad, this is not what he had in mind.
>>17962491Nazi welfare was more a stipend to incentivized population growth. It was not a promise to the german people the same way marxist distribution was. What was considered ideal then would change overtime. As the nazis lost, the iranians became pure Aryan to boost recruitment, but turkics, who were by far the most loyal soldiers of nazis, were not considered aryan. It's not too out of the picture to assume that people with brown hair or green eyes would be dehumanized after the wars were over.
>>17962491>You have a bit of a point about current day american republicans who would basically have americans live in squalor like the early modern underclass, barely sustaining themselves, but that's another matter.It isn't though. They follow the same economics.>>17962494China is a model marxist state. It just so happens to have an insular endogamous society.The second image is what I meant to put up.
>>17962500>It's not too out of the picture to assume that people with brown hair or green eyes would be dehumanized after the wars were overRidiculous. There's more brown and black haired germans than blondes.
>>17962507>It isn't though. They follow the same economics.That's because americans are stupid and the american right is especially stupid. Most european right wingers are in favour of the system of economic regulation and social welfare that we currently have, just only in favour of the native population.
>>17962538>the system of economic regulation and social welfare that we currently haveWhich is dysgenic though. People with more foresight would establish a system that incentivizes productive citizens to procreate and unproductive citizens to not procreate. Obviously that kind of thinking is considered nazi by the leftist establishment and not the most pressing matter either, so the right doesn't currently have a coherent opinion on the matter.
>>17962523It's not ridiculous because the blonde german was their poster child.It was going to devolve into that at some point.>>17962538European right are fully in favor of the dismantling of all welfare programs and privatization of government and health care services. They don't want the programs at all lol. Have you actually talked to them? They're practically led by Russian and American reactionaries
>>17962428>YELLOW PERILfresh oc
I have no idea why china is considered a threat. They have always been a starving insular people.Why do americans insist on making them look like some kind of threat?
>>17962543Ever since we got AI the productivity of citizens has become irrelevant.
>>17963044because they have territorial ambitions
>>17962428>>17962446>>17962494>>17963044OPs image is (unsurprisingly) misleading, it's an ultra-wideband single chip solution, but China didn't invent ultra-wideband wireless internet, that's already a thing and many Smartphones already support ultra-wideband internet. They also compare it to "rural US speed" which is extremely ambiguous and likely cherrypicked, in fact it's pretty telling they didn't even bother comparing it to typical US network speed.In any case, it's going to be awhile before anyone sees 6G internet anyways, and it remains to be seen whether or not it even has an advantage to 5G in the real world.
>>17963126>They also compare it to "rural US speed" which is extremely ambiguous and likely cherrypicked, in fact it's pretty telling they didn't even bother comparing it to typical US network speedThe US has a notorious issue with providing broadband coverage. That's why they get mentioned because providing the bare minimum for many communities hasn't really been accomplished yet. Most developed states sdon't have such an issue asides from self-induced ones innthe Anglosphere.
>>17962543>incentivizes productive citizens to procreate and unproductive citizens to not procreate.What is or isn't productive is super ambiguous and situational.
>>17963136>The US has a notorious issue with providing broadband coverage.Yeah but not really no
>>17963126They compared it to rural american speeds because those are their enemies and rivals.City Americans aren't the enemies of China.
>>17963143Whe multiple third party and several governnetvkevel bodies say so you can't really deny it. Especially with how ass fibre rollout have been due to ISP mono/duopolies allover NA.
>>17963158>Whe multiple third party and several governnetvkevel bodies say so you can't really deny it.Well yeah, there's nothing wrong with pushing for higher network speeds, but it's in all likeliness telecom lobbyists pushing this narrative. Most people fit any reasonable definition of broadband coverage (which the FCC defines as 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload on a single given device under controlled network tests)
>>17963162>it's in all likeliness telecom lobbyists pushing this narrativeIt's not. It's many rural people and towns/villages that basically have to live with dogshit internet in an era where having decent and consistent speeds is pretty much a necessity in the job markets.
>>17962428>ethnocapitalistsLMAO>>17963044The reason China is considered a threat is because they simply big enough to fill the power vacuum of a hypothetical American hegemony collapse. It's only through total ineptitude on America's part that China could ever truly rise.>>17963154City americans are the ones who work in various industries that directly support, strengthen, or supply the DOD with weapons that they aim at the Chinese 24/7. It's retarded backwoods hicks from flyover shitholes that think China would treat them any better than it treats their own citizens who aren't Han.
>>17962428>ethnocapitalists Doesn't apply to Fascism. Read D'Annunzio and Freda.>>17962494Also Franco wasn't a fascist
