Where can I find decent sources and articles on general archaeology? Whether it's material culture of the most varied kinds, from ceramics to weapons, descriptions and funerary/tomb patterns, clothing, artifacts etc., etc., etc., basically this entire framework, as long as it's reliable, because I use Research Gates (and others) a lot when I want to read about archaeology and I've read a lot of nonsense, usually as an "independent author." Could someone help me identify what would be a good source or a place on the Internet where such things accumulate? I'm already a haploaustist and linguistard, but I want to be a successful archeotard.
University networks are only accessible for its members. Universities are mega paywalls for aggregated knowledge like that.
>>17965585are you people retarded or something?learn what the fuck INTERNET SEARCH IS
>>17965628the OP literally said he does this and there's a lot of shit which is not a lie, there are a lot of Indian roles and independent authors in the middle of everything maybe you're the retarded one>>17965623It's true. Most articles are paid.>>17965585Anything pre-70s
>>17965585I base myself on how much the articles are cited and how renewed the authors are and who they base themselves on (other authors)
>>17966386Difficult
>>17965585A good onehttps://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adl2468
>>17965585The UK keeps publicly accessible reports from commerical digs on the Archaeology Data Service. There are also council historic environment records which are also available either through research contact or heritage gateway which are a mapped resource of every archaeological event/find in the county.
>>17966461I would say this to the OP, use articles from Nature and Science, because they are more rigid, not just any garbage of subjective quality that goes in there
>>17966478but are they restricted to the UK?
>>17966486Why would they be?
>>17966478no need to lie to the OP anon, we all know that English archaeology is solely concerned with "dark WHG
>>17965585Check-out
