Why do people, especially Indians, harbor a personal grudge against the "Yamnaya"?(it is not even the source of direct ancestry for the Iranian languages) Why are there desperate attempts to prove how they were "non-European"? Beyond attempts to base their arguments on abstract characteristics like facial features, there is a pseudo-argument that posits that they cannot be classified as European, even though they lived in European territory, due their base genotype.The argument consists of claiming that the "CHG" ancestry present in their genotype would place them outside the European spectrum.. besides a craze in postulating that CHG is synonymous with "iran_N", which is not true, even people like lazaridis do not buy this idea.
>>17977434Practically due to the popularity of the Yamnaya. That's all, these geniuses lack the basic knowledge of recent archaeogenetics to realize that the "Yamnaya" wasn't some kind of new ethnic group formed by the mixture of "CHG + EHG." In fact, the Yamnaya themselves didn't have much direct interaction with the "CHG" or any Caucasian pop (" CHG" no longer existed in 3200 BC)they're a group that exhibits continuity with older Eneolithic groups in Ukraine since at least the CLV. they were basically identical to Sredny Stog.So, to say that the Yamnaya were formed by the mixture of churkas and CHG is not only outdated but also ignorant.The "CHG" component (usually used as Kotias?) was present even before the existence of any Yamnaya. And these CHG quantities if not taken from mind, I'm afraid to say they are ideologically motivated. There's no more than 35% CHG in all the samples; the Yamnaya core had only 37% "churka," and furthermore, they are described by craniometry as "robust Europeans."
>>17977474It's even worse, I read the studies of the Pontic square beast (which you call Lazaridis) and he didn't even elaborate on which proxy "CHG" was sexually devoured by the Eneolithic populations, is it really Kotias? I suspect it could be a Churka source with a northern admixture, like Maykop. Although he says the steppe component would be Berezhnovka
>>17977434It's very brave to say that about him here, do you have the courage to answer him there? Female behavior
>>17977434Holy shit, I follow this guy, I've already gotten a lot of information from him. I didn't know he was a pooper for opposing their nationalist arguments and not denying the Pie homeland.
>>17977503Hello sameer, stop coping about crap that you have no idea
>>17977434Larp
>>17977434When you act obnoxiously, you invite scrutiny.
>>17977640Not a real argument
Bump
>>17977434how much CHG did they have exactly? and how similar is it to iran_J?
>>17978523Avarage 35%See picthey were somewhat related, but not the same population as the OP's photo retards postulate
>>17977434Indians envy and resent Whites. The fact that their civilization was founded by Whites sends them into a seething hot rage. "They weren't really white" is one of the many copes for their seethe.
OIT supporters are mostly Pajeets who just don't want to accept the fact that they have steppe ancestry in general.
>>17978550Not the sameer, tard
>>17977666/thread OP BTFO
