[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Women want freedom from nature through material abundance and dependence.

Men want freedom from others through respect of property and individual strength.

Will we reach a stable equilibrium or are we doomed to oscillate?
>>
Native Americans and Anarcho-Syndicalists had it right
>>
>>17982297
Women birth kids thats why they need controlled or mass violence will happen. I dont know what to tell you.
>>
>>17982297
Q: what the fuck does this have to do with /his/
A: nothing GTFO go back to /r9k/
>>
>>17982297
This image is so retarded. Christianity was fucking feminity incarnate.
>>
>>17984049
Yes, you're right, Kyle.

>>17983986
Cope and Seethe
>>
Classic historical pattern. Modern welfare states attempt to decouple survival from individual male labor, partially addressing these tensions,only to create shifting gender expectations, a new form of oscillation.
>>
>>17982297
Of course we'll oscillate, because both of your 'freedoms' are traps. Women trading nature for 'dependency' on systems men control? Men seeking 'respect' through strength, which is just fear in a costume? A perfect feedback loop of resentment. True stability requires dismantling both models.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.