It's impossible to know for certain if God exists. You just pick whatever you're most comfortable with.
>>17982360I may or may not, but definitely can prove you wrong but OK anon
>>17982366Go ahead.
>>17982371It involved some earnest mediation anon, sorry I cant invite you
>>17982373I meditated on this quite a lot.
>>17982360If God exists, then it is possible to know for certain God exists.
>>17982373>>17982375You can't ever know for sure though if the feelings you have of religious certainty are born from genuine divine connection or mental illness or just plain delusion born from wishful thinking. The best you can do is try to push aside the uncertainty but there will still always be room for lingering doubt. After all, in every faith there are those followers who are 100% true believers.
>>17982405You don’t know the sky is blue because you read it in a book somewhere, but because you look up and realize it through experience.There are ways to experience God anon
>>17982360I converted to Christianity because God exists
>>17982360>>17982401>>17982405If God exists then He can by exercise of His omnipotent power cause me to know with certainty that He exists. If God cannot do this, then He is not omnipotent. If He is not omnipotent, then He is not what theists mean by "God". Therefore, there are absolutely only 2 possibilities 1. If God exists, then it is possible to know with certainty that God exists, therefore agnosticism is false2. It is certain that God does not exist, therefore agnosticism is falseAgnosticism is logically impossible >You can't ever know for sure though if the feelings you have of religious certaintyIt is moving the goalposts to speak of certainty with regard to knowledge and then speak of certainty as a feeling. Likewise positing an irrational feeling of doubt rather than objective doubt is moving the goalposts and irrelevant. The latter is possible to eliminate in this life, not necessarily the former.
>>17982415People hallucinate all the time and believe what they saw was 100% real. The ambiguity you feel you've side-stepped is still present, albeit temporarily ignored.
>>17982428Are you certain that you exist?
>>17982428Are you suggesting you hallucinate the sky being blue every day and negate feeling experience? You may be in a state or depersonalization if you cannot trust your own senses anon
>>17982420How do you know?
>>17982436He revealed Himself
>>17982440How?
>>17982436like this anon said>>17982440I read the Bible and watched some animated Bible shows as a child. My family did not oppose it in any way so I kept going
>>17982449He has revealed Himself in the natural world, and in the conscience of man, but most of all He has revealed Himself by the scriptures in the person of His Son.
this wojak probably looks badass if you're a teenager
Meditating to get a "God experience", to justify your belief in God, sounds a lot like intentionally gaslighting yourself
>>17982478Pretending you dont have a soul inside of you seems like cope behavior, unless you are a legit NPC because that would not surprise me either using terms like gaslighting
>>17982360you can't get any more retarded than thinking the universe arose from natural causes.
>>17982360The only thing I know for certain is; Hindu's are wrong
>>17982485>god is unnaturalenjoy burning!
I love Odin.
>>17982483If you just have a mind, and you don't have a soul. How could you go about figuring that out? What's the differences?
Can you think of any principle differences between "experiencing God" during a meditation, and experience the sky being blue?
What does it feel like to experience God? Is that feeling best explained by a God causing it, or, best explained by human biology - the mental state you put yourself in during meditation
>>17982506>and you dont have a soulProve it?
The cosmic Pachinko: Billions of souls fall from high above crash against lifes obstacles and fall into the pit.
>>17982510"experiencing God" isn't testable
>>17982546I'm asking you howWhat's the difference between having a mind, and having a soul?
>>17982601Why would I know that? Why would you trust me if I said I did? Do you enjoy asking impertinent questions. Does this help you not believe in god?
>>17982585It is when I tested it.I would imagine you have the means as well
>>17982463Literally none of this is true. Try to actually give true points when making an argument.
>>17982510Other people can see the sky?
>>17982716Huh, I tested it too and came to the opposite conclusion as you.
>>17983503Cope
>>17982546Corpus callosotomy proves that the "self" doesn't exist, it's a fiction. One side of the brain does something the other cannot know, and then the other side confabulates a bullshit reason to explain why it did it in order to preserve the narrative of the self. Therefore souls cannot exist as a transcendental cohesive individual, and the mind arises bottom-up from more fundamental neural relationships that give rise to conscious processes and are patched together through the default mode network.
God of the bible is all made up by ancient goat lovers who liked their cocks mutilated. That being said..A generic God doesnt matter if it exists or not, after we die we dissapear completly so this life is everything we got.
>>17982360> tfw brainlets think "whatever you're most comfortable with" changes objective reality
>>17984073There's no proof that any religion is objective reality
>>17982436the most powerful intuition of all is the illogical nature of the 2nd law of thermodynamics: where did this energy come from, and what does its finitude imply?
>>17983753>my nitpicked scenario I pulled off chatgpt actually proves there is no soul, chudit's so tiresome.
>>17982478You're right, we should all just be mindless consoomerist faggots shitposting on a mongolian basket weaving forum. Thank you once again for informing my popular consensus based worldview, Mr. CIA.
>>17984536It does prove there is no souk.Why do you dislike the fact that your brain is the mind and souls don't exist?
>>17984536Corpus callosotomies have been studied long before LLMs m8, wtf are you on about?
>>17982360Magic and Spritual Powers do exist tho.
>>17984611God is El who exists aswell.
>>17982463>most of all He has revealed Himself by the scriptures in the person of His SonDo you know you're not hallucinating the text into being? Surely you would reqognize that people with an halicinatory mental state exists, so what makes you think you're not one of them?
>>17984563>It does prove there is no souk.it's amazing how this isn't even a universal opinion among trained (majority does not mean conclusive) neuroscientists then. nor is the same tired "if I hit your head with a hammer you'll lose consciousness blah blah" argument even a refutation of the immateriality of the soul.>Why do you dislike the fact that your brain is the mind and souls don't exist?the fact it invokes such an intense, visceral reaction in you is what's truly interesting.>>17984596bot post
>>17984616>Do you know you're not hallucinating the text into being?Yes.>Surely you would reqognize that people with an halicinatory mental state exists, so what makes you think you're not one of them?1. I do not recognize that people with perpetual and universal hallucinatory mental states exist, such that they truly live in a fantasy world totally divested of connection to reality 2. Such a scenario as the revelation of God being hallucinated would require it to not exist, which is self-refuting and impossible
>>17982360>It's impossible to know for certain if God exists...Unless you define God. Then you can know.
>>17984663>perpetual and universal hallucinatory mental statesUnnecessary for the argument to work, but do people possessed by demons in the gospels count?>Such a scenario as the revelation of God being hallucinated would require it to not exist, which is self-refuting and impossibleNot the whole text, just parts of it, if such people exist can you know you're not one of them?
>>17982420based
>>17984750>Unnecessary for the argument to workAbsolutely necessary, since for example, if the scriptures were my hallucination, so too necessarily would be this conversation.>but do people possessed by demons in the gospels count?We essentially do not "know what it's like" to be possessed by a demon, so no>Not the whole text, just parts of itIf only parts were a hallucination, then the parts which are real would be sufficient to refute this silly nonsense.
>>17983710You're a moron. Nothing in >>17982463 is true. You need to say true things when making an argument.
>>17982463All of this is true.
>>17984654>this isn't even a universal opinion among trained (majority does not mean conclusive) neuroscientistsWrong, the self is well understood to be a fiction. It's literally a no-go scenario, it's impossible for it to exist given the evidence from corpus callosotomy.
>>179845231 Energy cannot be created or destroyed2 God, if he real - created energyC Therefor, God not real
Can a Theist just explain to me their PoV on the Problem of Evil? I've been thinking about it a lot recently, and I don't know how you can reconcile love with something like the Rape of Nanjing, Holocaust, insert other big bad thing that proves people are animals here.
>>17985129We create things we want, not things we dont want. The inverse of what we create is evil. If a being intentionally creates something that is precieved as evil by another being, that intentionally evil being is defined as Satan, and its energy is converted into another form that will create the good things we want.
Agreed. Everyone is wired differently and have had unique experiences and so there's a huge variety of what counts as good reasoning and evidence.
>>17982360Comfortable? That is the worst metric ever. If there is a God, they are either incompetent or a sadist... So why worship that? If there isn't, we are just smart apes making up meaning to feel better. Either way, the only based choice is to pick the option that pisses off the most people who think they have it all figured out.
