>muh the end of historyNow I realize that what Francis Fukuyama wrote was just wishful thinking. The West and Japan refuse to accept that they were defeated by Eurasia
>>17983337wow that logo is so frutiger ero
The battle isn't over yet, that was his mistake.He couldn't rationalize the possibility that any nation would reject the global order when it was so entangled and interconnected.
>"combating regional terrorism, ethnic separatism, and religious extremism">pakistan, indialol, lmao
You idiots don’t bother to actually read it and only think that Fukuyama was trying to say “history is over now!”
>>17983769You see the title and consider it a nice punching bag for scoring “I’m very smart” points. It's basically a textbook example of judging a book by it's cover.In the book he states that liberal democracy *might* end up being the final form of government because it satisfies a lot of our material and non-material needs.HOWEVER, he also discusses the various reasons and scenarios that would lead to liberal democracy backsliding and resurgence of authoritarianism. And what do you know, several of those scenarios are exactly what we’re seeing happen in the world right now.But his core theory is that there will be an inexorable pull back towards liberal democracy. While an airplane may leave the ground, the pull of gravity will eventually force it to come back down to Earth.
>>17983337sand monkeys not allowed outside /pol/ go back
