The atheist and the theist both make the mistake of self confidence. They build their foundations out of stone rather than mud in a vain attempt to impose objectivity only to then ask why their home is rotting. Their narcissistic drive for peace can only lead towards conclusion and instead of accepting that they preempt it.
>>17984134>some wording issues
>>17984134There's no magical genie in the sky, lil bro.
>>17984134No we don't, Abrahamic religions are just three different versions of the same whiny womanly crybullying>endlessly bitch, moan, whine and annoy>someone rightfully kicks the fuck out of you>play the oppressed victim>repeat endlesslyThat's it. If you find that in any way 'spiritual', you're either a psychopath or a literal schizo
>>17984228Objectively or subjectively? More importantly does the distinction matter?
>>17984371How in the fuck can the (non)existence of a magical genie in the sky be subjective? Go get your brain checked out, el retardo.>inb4 5d petersonian sophistryNot interested in highschool dropout philosophy.
>>17984394How can 4 out 5 doctors recommending Colgate be subjective?
>>17984400Ah ok, I didn't realize I was talking to an actual retard who cannot differentiate between recommendations and matters of fact. I predict that next you will confuse yourself by equivocating between matters of fact and claims regarding matters of fact because you can't into linguistic recursion.
>>17984134The wheel and the computer metaphors are correct though.
>>17984417Actually my trip is currently on narcissism and the way it plays a role in ideology. That both sides fall into the same traps and don't realise they're in the same hole as each other.
>>17984134But the theist is the biggest loser. He is committed to claiming he has possession of absolute truth, whereas the skeptic, if not the atheist, has no such obligation. The skeptic can admit ignorance, but the theist can't.
>>17984450Can the atheist admit that there might be truth within the words of the theist? Regardless of belief can the secular mind gain worth from the intuitive mind?
>>17984437>actually my trip is currently in using buzzwords to claim that everyone aside from me (the enlightened centrist that I am) is a malicious retard>there can subjectively be a magical genie in the sky btw
>>17984491What about my post made you think I was calling you a malicious retard? What would I have to gain from that?
>>17984504>hehehe I totally wasn't saying both sides are le bad because of narcissism nooooh oh boy that sure couldn't be me hahaKill yourself, maybe you'll meet that subjective genie of yours.
>>17984465It is possible that the theist might attain truth, in the sense that anything is possible. The skeptic can not make any metaphysical or epistemic commitment he is only permitted to be arbitrary, but that doesn't mean that he can't function.
>>17984230SAAR
>>17984546But can worth be found within the intuitive or is it all worthless because it hasn't been measured? Are there tools that the wizard uses that the scientist could benefit from?
>>17984565We have no knowledge of worth, value, or truth. It all has to be presupposed or as the theist puts it we need a leap of faith.
>>17984565Saying that the ramblings of the god-botherer are intuitive as opposed to the atheist's view is begging the question.
>>17984604What makes you think I'm referring to Christians?
>>17984612I never mentioned Christians, retard. Fucking hell, talking to 85IQs really is a chore.
>>17984134>self-confidence badlol, you've got it all wrong, kid
