/his/ - Base on all we know about historical religions and - History & Humanities

Anonymous

09/08/25(Mon)18:24:01 No.17984873

File: Religion evolution.jpg (3.6 MB, 2250x1591)

Anonymous 09/08/25(Mon)18:24:01 No.17984873 Archived

Base on all we know about historical religions and anthropology, what would be the most likely traits of humans natural religion ?

Anonymous
09/08/25(Mon)18:25:39 No.17984877

Anonymous 09/08/25(Mon)18:25:39 No.17984877

The bible answers this question in Genesis

Anonymous
09/08/25(Mon)19:19:01 No.17985019

Anonymous 09/08/25(Mon)19:19:01 No.17985019

>>17984873
>likely traits of humans natural religion?
Taoist teachings outlined this two millennia ago

Anonymous
09/08/25(Mon)19:31:03 No.17985039

Anonymous 09/08/25(Mon)19:31:03 No.17985039

>no connection between zoroastrianism and christianity
lolwut

Anonymous
09/08/25(Mon)19:35:50 No.17985047

Anonymous 09/08/25(Mon)19:35:50 No.17985047

>>17984873
Egypt

Anonymous
09/08/25(Mon)21:57:29 No.17985268

Anonymous 09/08/25(Mon)21:57:29 No.17985268

Marking transitions like death are universal behaviors and likely predate belief in gods.

Anonymous
09/09/25(Tue)03:27:40 No.17985736

Anonymous 09/09/25(Tue)03:27:40 No.17985736

File: output.jpg (487 KB, 1196x672)

487 KB JPG

>>17984873
Forget divine revelation. The natural religion would be a transactional, animist buffet. We'd see spirits in everything (that weird rock, your lucky hunt) and perform rituals not for moral purity, but to bribe, appease, or threaten unseen forces for direct, tangible benefits. It'd be selfish, superstitious, and wildly pragmatic.

Simon Salva !!h4wpIXR3ZRV
09/09/25(Tue)03:31:26 No.17985741

Simon Salva !!h4wpIXR3ZRV 09/09/25(Tue)03:31:26 No.17985741