[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1659439287420.webm (2.53 MB, 640x1138)
2.53 MB
2.53 MB WEBM
Why were the romans so short and brown?
>>
File: retarded.png (121 KB, 241x364)
121 KB
121 KB PNG
>>17984962
you are mentally ill
>>
they didn't NEED to
>>
Skeletal remains, frescoes, and modern DNA studies of ancient Italian populations tell us they were not.
>>
>>17985299
>The average Roman was shorter than the average modern person, with men around 5' 5" to 5' 6" (about 168 cm) and women around 5' 1" to 5' 2" (about 155 cm), based on skeletal studies from the period between 500 BCE and 500 CE. While specific figures vary by location and study, the general trend shows a shorter stature compared to today's populations.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.