Was big booba considered sexual in minoan society?
No.
>>17985438Proof?
>>17985456
>>17985472This reply is based and quirky, upvoted.
>>17985436In antiquity breast were non-sexual but feet were sexual - this is because the ancients had higher spirits than us moderns ..
>>17985436
Is there any proof of the open booba thing among actual people or was that not just some idol of a godess that has given us that picture
>>17986166Every single depiction of Minoan women has them bare chested. Every one.
We still haven't deciphered Linear A so we have effectively no understanding of Minoan thought or cultural values other than what we can extrapolate from archaeology.
>>17985436Probably not, scarcity and taboo create erotica. You see women ankles and skin routinely so just the sight of a woman's ankle doesn't arouse you like it would a village Muslim in Yemen.Same would apply to the minoans and african tribes that do similar
>>17986175How many Linear A writings do we have?Captcha: 4THRD
>>17985436Michael Jackson?
>>17986358Idk senpai, I see asses all the time thanks to yoga pants, thong bikinis etc and it never gets old
No. Instead, large breasts probably symbolized social status, not sexual attractiveness per se.
>>17986406Shitloads from Crete, Thira and the Mainland, plus Cretan hieroglyphics plus whatever the fuck the Phaistos Disk is.
Everyone has always liked breasts, even places where bare breasts were the norm, its just human nature.
>>17985436>Coltish women with wasp thin waists and giant bolt ons and trim peachy buttsThey truly were the Atlanteans. After Santorini was buried in that eruption civilization spent 4000 years in the thicc/chubby chaser dark ages.
>>17985436No. Taboo makes things erotic. Incas used to think that large foreheads were erotic.
