>christianity is true by the impossibility of the contrary!>how do you know the contrary is impossible?>because it's not possible!>but how do you know that?>by the impossibility of the contrary!
>>17986346I once had a Christian argue without a trace of irony that "Christianity must be true or else I wouldn't be going to Heaven!" These aren't serious people.
>>17986375I just let you present your clunky egg head theory about particles and matter and star dust and then I ask two simple questions>is the universe contracting or expanding?>where did matter originate from?Then I laugh when atheists squirm and look stupid. These cant be serious people
>>17986376You literally believe the Earth is 6000 years old lol.
>>17986376You're genuinely a fucking idiotMatter and energy are necessarily infinite and eternal via th quantum eternity theorem Yes, you're a system of atoms and molecules in a specific arrangement. There is no difference between you and a rock other the arrangement of the particles that constitute the two bodies. The fact that you can't grasp this is because you're very very stupid.
>>17986376I don't knowI don't knowTherfor, Jesus
>>17986381praise da lawd and such
>>17986377I literally dont though lol you dont have to believe things written in a book word for word and the 6000 is a calculation based on someones interpretation of genealogy going back to Adam. Nowhere in the book does it ever say 6000 years once so you are attacking it based on an already flawed assumption so congrats on being dishonest. Care to take a crack at the same two questions I presented? Nope?>>17986378How do you know this energy you speak of is not God, you seem really certain of yourself for some reason
>>17986387You literally believe in magic like a little child. You might as well believe the Earth is 6000 years old.>Care to take a crack at the same two questions I presented?Expanding.No idea.Is that the squirming and looking stupid you were hoping for, boy?
>>17986392Oh it is expanding you say? Because I read that is only a theory and it could be contracting actually. You seem to know for certain, so you must be a leading expert in this field with a doctorate degree from .. where? Never mind you know there is a theory that we are in a false vacuum? Being as hoe nobody has ever touched or seen the edge of the universe it seems we have no idea the actual shape and structure of it and you are making stuff up anon, so congrats!
>>17986387You can call it God if you want, but it isn't personal. It's definitively NOT the Christian GodChristianity is false. Why do you mald and seethe about this
>>17986397>Because I read that is only a theory and it could be contracting actually.Oh, have you? Got a link or something? I like learning new things. Cosmology is way out of my field of expertise so I'm bound to operate with outdated information in many areas.So anyway, why do you think wizardry is real and a Jewish preacher from ancient Levant restored people's damaged ocular tissues with his spit?
>>17986400How do you know that Christians and their Jewish predecessors were not describing your precious energy as God, how do you know all religions have not figured out that simple conclusion that God is infinite energy? Why do you seem to imagine yourself as this supreme enlightenment being who has barely lived a few decades in this place. Seems like hubris you should have checked if not by me
>>17986408Because I can read what they wrote and thought and see that they weren't talking about this. Answer the question: why does the FACT that Christianity is false piss you off so much?
>>17986411Seems like you got it all figured out then anon, enjoy your eternal rest in nothingness, I sure hope you dont return into something else one day, not because it would prove me (and Isaac Newton) correct but it would also prove the Buddha correct and you would have to come back and suffer. You might even need to do it a third time, imagine that
>>17986412Nta but what this post shows most of all is how utterly obsessed you are with showing people that you're correct and they're not. It's like the fulcrum of your entire being.
>>17986417Actually it just shows that I try to push people into admitting “I dont know” because that is the most honest thing they could do. Why do you continue to lie? Not to me but to yourself
>>17986376You justify yourself with mythology instead of the scientific method. You don't care about proof so no one should take your arguments seriously. Unfalsifiable conclusions are worthless.
>>17986424>scientific method cannot explain the big bang>hurr durr curse you and mythologyI would just prefer a more full interpretation than what you are capable of giving me, sorry that hurts your ego
>>17986346If christianity is real why pajjets and niggers exist?
>>17986422You're literally hoping that there is some cosmic system in place that will punish him for saying you're a dummy. Completely maladjusted.
>>17986431I dont care about punishment and I dont wish it on others, you are imagining that part. I wanted exactly what I said I wanted, anon to meet me in the middle of “I dont know” rather than saying science can prove everything, which is clearly a lie
>>17986444>I dont care about punishmentLiar, liar, pants on fire
I just think it's TRUE that there's a cosmic system in place that will punish people who disagree with me, I don't CARE about it
>>17986444I don't care about your lies, you were clearly fantasizing about him getting punished in an earlier post. You will try to dispute this to protect your ego, but again, I don't care. You know I can go back and reread the posts, right? He never says "science can prove everything". You made a cope post where you were like "if I redefine "God" to mean energy, God exists", to which he replied that you can do that but it's not the personal God of Christianity, you then made another cope post saying that maybe the ancient goat herders thought what currentyear scientists call "energy" wants them to mutilate their dicks, he called it out as idiotic and then you threw a tantrum.
>>17986451Seems like you do? Why is that all that is on your mind right now?>>17986456Your ego is so damaged when a sensible person comes and asks you why your daddy science god cannot prove the simplest and most basic questions about the universe. I can see you unravel
>>17986456Would it not be a shame if the mutilated dick parts was just a flawed understanding of man and his social laws, but that God is still the infinite energy that abounds the universe. Would it be a shame if both those things were true at the same time? It would huh
>>17986429Not a very good attempt at trying a "No, you!" since it doesn't work here, retard.
>>17986462Cope. >>17986467What do you even think energy is?
>>17986477It is more about what I think energy *isnt* , and I have no idea what that could be lol. Do you?There is no energy outside God, so
>>17986479Nice attempted dodge, but sadly for you I'm not completely retarded. When a physicist says "energy", what do you think he is referring to? And I don't mean that in the sense of "what is the hidden truth about this energy thing woooo" but simply what is he attempting to communicate by using the word. Do you know that, or are you just being a linguistic parasite and attempting to steal a vibe off the scientist's usage while replacing the actual semantic content?
>>17986494Point to me energy that is not God and I will give you all the money I have, its a fair amount desu
>>17986495Your refusal to answer is duly noted, sophist. You can go back to wishing that people who say you're wrong will be punished for it by some sort of cosmic force.
>>17986346I'm almost convinced pre-supp arguments are designed to be as much of a waste of the interlocutor's time as possible.
>>179863761 Energy cannot be created or destoyed2 God, if he real, created energyC Therfor, God not real
>>17986502It is a lot of money, like tens of thousands of dollars if you are interested. You seem so smart and confident yet you have doubts that you can show me energy outside of God. That is a shame
>>17986376An interesting postulate. Now tell me: how do you reconcile the idea that "souls" exist with the clear proof that there is no such thing as a unitary self, as evidenced by phenomena such as phantom limbs, split-brain confabulation, blindsight, Cotard's delusion and asomatognosia? How can there be a "soul" if the self empirically does not exist?
>>17986408We understand that ancient jews stole real science and philosophy from egypstians and greeks and bastardized it into their abominable religion, yes. You imagine jews are the supreme enlightened beings? lmao. Well, you literally worship one as god. If anything this logic is affirming "paganism">>17986429>le dork matterScientism is religion, yes. nice self-own, retard
When your argument relies on itself, it doesn’t actually prove the conclusion.
>>17986615Science is not a religion, retard. The fundamental premise is that it's possible to derive conclusions from experimentation. Even if you were to argue that we can't know anything in terms of essence you still have no reason to ascribe it to a willful creator. One is the act of observation and experimentation, the other is believing in one of thousands of meme beliefs, all of which have 0 evidence for their assertions I know the idea of god not existing is scary, but behaving like a child and believing in magic instead is even worse. Deluding yourself for a safety blanket, knowing on some level that you're wallowing in mud, when you have the gift of consciousness. What a disappointing waste of a life.
>Christians: There is no other way for X.>malscript_error>proveitspam.exeIt's always fascinating to see atheists with their pure unfiltered unhinged behavior.
