[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


how Spain superpower when no one live ther?
>>
File: 1744623944459985s.jpg (7 KB, 250x250)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>>17990812
That's the thing anon, it wasn't. It got a headstart from all the incan and aztec gold that carried it for a century or so but after that everyone centralised and modernised their economy and governments and could slap spain about as they wished.
>>
>>17990868
Literally not true.

Spain became a hegemony because silver from the Americas and marriage. The Spanish habsburg ended up controlling a quarter of Europe more or less.

It failed for the same reason most hegemony fails: expensive wars.
Spanish hegemony rose in the 1500s for said reasons, and declined on the 1600s.
It started to wage war everywhere, most of thr conflicts were linked to the reformation (80 years war/Dutch revolution, 30-years war, armada on England etc). Spanish economic mismanagement was a central part of Spanish hegemony decline but that was largely due to inflation.
Successor hegemony was the French hegemony under Louise the sun king which ended the same way: expensive wars. The entire 1700 was marked by major wars which France lost to England (Spanish succession war, Seven years war, Austria succession war, Revolution wars/Napoleonic wars).
The successor hegemony became Britain after winning through the 1700 and rapid industrialization in early 1800, and then the British hegemony declined due to (guess what) expensive wars.
>>
>>17990878
>Spain became a hegemony because silver from the Americas and marriage. The Spanish habsburg ended up controlling a quarter of Europe more or less.
Entirely through luck and not merit, they were in the correct geographical position along with portugal to reach the new world, they didn't have existentially threatening external or internal enemies, they were just retards who spent the last 700 years chimping out against non-christians and felt no need to change their ways. Had the trastamarids not died out and they didn't get entangled in central european politics they still would've still ended up a stagnant shithole dependant on gold from the new world. Everyone else invested their colonial wealth, spain spent it, it caught up to them after the 30 years war when just about everyone larger than portugal matched them in power and eventually surpassed them.
>>
>>17990991
>Everyone else invested their colonial wealth
IIRC Jacob Viner and others showed that, economically, colonialism always sucked and cost more than it produced in revenue, even if some forms of colonialism were particularly retarded in their wastefulness. I think maybe the Dutch were the only ones who might have made it somewhat profitable and even then I'm not sure considering the constant expenditure of military resources and manpower their colonies demanded.
>>
>>17990812
Money from colonies and military might. Also Spain wasn't a superpower until Charles V when they had control of the Netherlands (one of if not the richest parts of Europe), Lombardy (one of the most developed parts of Europe), and Sicily and Naples (the centre of the Mediterranean). There's a reason the Spanish fought the Dutch for 80 years before giving up, it would be like modern Britain without the greater London area, a huge chunk of its economy gone.
>>
>>17990812
The same than Ottoman Empire. Anatolia and Greece were barely populated. It was the plus of all the inhabitants of Spain, Italy, America, Philippines and Flanders that made up the population.


>>17991046
Spain was a power before Charles I.
Aragon kicked the French out of Sicily during XIII century and then expanded into North Africa and Athens. Catholic Kings expelled French from Naples and conquered it. Also expelled the French from Italy.

The political marriage with the Habsbourgs that was led by Ferdinand of Aragon, who also married his other daughter to Henry VIII of England, was just made to cuck French from warmonggering. Aragon also out two Spanish Borgia popes that basically gave Castile the rights over America.

The role of Ferdinand of Aragon was the pillar of Spanish empire, even Philip II wrote about it. The very emperor of HRE, Ferdinand I, was raised by Ferdinand the Catholic while Charles I was raised in Netherlands.
>>
File: 1721714081489.jpg (1.39 MB, 1172x1920)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB JPG
>>17990878
Spain became an hegemon because of Trastamaras. Machiavelli based "Il Principe" around Caesar Borgia and Ferdinand of Aragon.

>The King of France complains that I have twice deceived him. He lies, the fool; I have deceived him ten times and more.
—Ferdinand the Catholic


The Spanish army during XV, XVI and XVII centuries was at its peak after centuries of war against Arabs. The Tercios were the first modern army in Europe after the Dark Ages.
>>
>>17990868
>It got a headstart from all the incan and aztec gold that carried it for a century or so
You could say the same about all empires. Like how Britain used the India cheat code to get rich as fuck.
>>
>>17991067
>Spain became an hegemon because of Trastamaras.
True, the Trastamaras were the true architects of the Spanish Empire. A shame the Habsburgs took over and squandered all of the progress they did.
>>
>>17991498
Not really, Britain wasn't the first european nation to get to India and by the time they were there the Indians had guns and missiles.
Meanwhile the Spanish stumbled upon a previously unknown continent, filled with gold and populated by people who barely knew how to use iron. They got given it by the pope and had a full century of it all to themselves before anyone else showed up in force.
>>
>>17992493
Spain peaked with Habsbourgs at military power, political influence, arts, humanities, etc. The authentic decline was under Bourbons.
>>
>>17990991
O algo ese ese
>>17991046
Spain was already the main european power during the rule of the catholic king
>>
>>17992511
You say that as if Spain is the only country in Europe with an Atlantic coast.
That the other took more than a century to catch up is not Spain problem
And Spain was anyway the main military power of Europe before the Azyec and Inca conquest
>>
>>17993082
And for worse because among Atlantic nations, Spain had a worse position than Britain and Morocco which had a direct link to the maritime routes of the north Atlantic and south Atlantic. The Canary Islands were a base from where the ships made stops before taking the south atlantic route.
Britishand French lasted almost 2 centuries to start their own naval expansion projects and Moroccans never did it.
>>
>>17993070
The Habsburg project was entirely based on the Trastamara one, but worse, because Spain wasted so many time, men and money in defending the low countries, problem that the Trastamara wouldn't have had, in the first place.
>>
Spain was never as economically strong as England.
>>
>>17993567
Bourbons directly had not a political project besides using Spain as paypig colony of France. You may hate all you want the Habsbourgs but they kept, as you say, the political project of Trastamaras and expanded an empire into its peak.
>>
>>17993079
>during the rule of the catholic king
Who is?
>>
>>17991061
>two Spanish Borgia popes that basically gave Castile the rights over America
This is an exaggeration. If the Pope was really that biased, he would have kicked Portugal out of the Americas, thing that didn't happen, but should have.
>>
>>17993082
>You say that as if Spain is the only country in Europe with an Atlantic coast.
Aye, but it is it also the one furthest away from the gulf stream and the easterly winds and closest to the Westerly winds of the tropics. There's a reason French and English sailors traveled down to Spain when they wanted to sail to the Americas, even when in opposition to that country.
>That the other took more than a century to catch up is not Spain problem
Why not? They controlled the existing trade routes and got the pope to disallow other catholics colonizing lands.
>And Spain was anyway the main military power of Europe before the Azyec and Inca conquest
Irrelevant to my point and something I doubt.
>>17993289
The British did charter a sailor - Cabot and he discovered... Newfoundland, a territory worthless to all but fishermen. Spain's closeness to the westerly winds of the tropics gave it the advantage over England to be able to access the true riches of the new world.
Your statement is however true of Morocco and I suppose much of Africa. But they're not European so meh.
>>
>>17993289
And they started their naval expansion BECAUSE THEY STOLE the naval maps from the Spaniards in some raids. They literally copied the maps because they did not know how to really navigate the oceans and the currents.
>>
>>17994157
>and he discovered... Newfoundland, a territory worthless to all but fishermen
Newfoundland was discovered by Basque whalers.
>>
>>17990991
>Entirely through luck and not merit, they were in the correct geographical position along with portugal to reach the new world
And yet Portugal proceeded to do nothing with Brazil for about 200 years.
>>
>>17994688
They founded cities, evangelized natives, and had plantations there, like sugar, which was highly profitable before gold was found. When the gold rush started, Brazil exploded in population and was the biggest gold producer in the world, which contributed heavily to building the country
>>
>>17993701
The first Bourbons were not bad, but the ones after Charles III? Yeah
>>
>>17990812
Population was more important in those times because you could raise bigger armies but even in that time it was more important having a good economy, intelligent people and armed forces.

Tell me how Portugal or The Netherlands got so powerful when they are not even the biggest european nations in terms of population or land.
>>
>>17991061
>Aragon kicked the French out of Sicily during XIII century
No, they kicked a Frenchman out of Sicily.

>then expanded into North Africa and Athens
And lost it all

>Catholic Kings expelled French from Naples and conquered it.
No, they expelled a French guy from Naples.

>Also expelled the French from Italy.
The Italian Wars were under the Hapsburgs who had control over Spain, its colonies, the low countries, and Austria. Spanish power wasn't treated seriously until the Italian Wars.
>>
>>17995856
>No, they expelled a French guy from Naples.
Yes, the King of France, the man who represented all Frenchmen.
>>
>>17990878
no it failed because of usury
stick to wikipedia edit wars
>>
>>17994657
Newfoundland was discovered by the Irish monk St Brendan the Navigator
>>
Quality over quantity, also the terrain made it difficult to have such large populations. France and germany had it so easy having endless plains and fields to farm as well as navigable rivers, from the alps and the pyrenees.
>>
>>17991061
>Aragon kicked the French out
Catalans did that
>>
>>17996373
>Newfoundland was discovered by the Irish monk St Brendan the Navigator
A monk that did not know how to write a book telling us that supposed discovery? He did not discover anything or was not smart enough to know that he discovered an island.
>>
>>17996398
Cope
Columbus didn't think he had discovered anything new
>>
>>17996476
>Columbus didn't think he had discovered anything new
That is why he took Spanish navigators and priests. because they knew that they discovered something big and wrote about them in several chronicles.

The merit was not Columbus. The merit was the Spanish sailors, soldiers, historians, priests, governors,etc. In fact, Columbus was almost going back to Spain after some weeks but an experimented sailor told him to wait because he has just seen some coastal birds and they found America 3 days later.
>>
>>17996616
>In fact, Columbus was almost going back to Spain after some weeks but an experimented sailor told him to wait because he has just seen some coastal birds and they found America 3 days later.

How is possible to know that happened? Because another sailor said that happened?
>>
>>17997074
Yes, there is a well-known episode in Christopher Columbus's first voyage where the sighting of birds played a crucial role in convincing the crew that land was near. This event is documented in Columbus's journal, as transcribed by Bartolomé de las Casas.

The Role of Birds in Indicating Land

According to the journal, on September 14, 1492, the crew of the Niña observed a type of tern that never ventures more than twenty-five leagues from land. This observation was significant because it suggested that land was nearby. Later, on September 17, a tropic bird was seen, which does not sleep at sea, further indicating proximity to land. Then, on September 19, a pelican came aboard, a species not accustomed to venturing more than twenty leagues from shore. These sightings provided hope and reinforced the belief that land was close
Archivo Americano
.

Journal Reference

These entries are part of the journal that Columbus kept during his voyage. The original manuscript has been lost, but Bartolomé de las Casas made a transcription in the 16th century, which serves as the primary source for these accounts. The journal covers events from August 3, 1492, to March 15, 1493, and includes detailed descriptions of the voyage, encounters with indigenous peoples, and observations of the natural environment
Wikipedia
.

Significance of the Bird Sightings

The sightings of these birds were pivotal moments in the voyage. They not only provided tangible evidence that land was near but also boosted the morale of the crew, who had been growing increasingly anxious and skeptical about the journey. These observations exemplify how sailors of the time relied on nature's signs to navigate and make critical decisions during long voyages.
>>
>>17990812
Why does noone want to live in Spain anyway? You'd think being the most visited country in the world would mean people were also flocking to live there, but no.
>>
>>17990812
It was a vassal of the Habsburgs and Vatican
>>
>>17992493
Trasmataras and Habsburgs were both Germanic clans. That’s why Spain failed.
>>
>>17997286
Making a life for yourself has different requirements from having an enjoyable vacation. When visiting for a short time you don't have to worry about what to do for work or the monotony of a year round hot climate, or the expensive real estate in the areas that attracted you to the country in the first place. There's also the fact that the country's immigration policy may not be welcoming to people attempting to settle permanently.
>>
>>17997286
LOL. You are obvious a new worlder.

There are like 2-3 million northEuropean retirees living all the year in Spain: from the nordics, UK, Germany, Dutch, etc.
>>
>>17994765
>*Enslaved natives
Fixed
>>
File: 1757876321748.jpg (346 KB, 1087x1087)
346 KB
346 KB JPG
>>17994169
Spain joining the Seven Years' War after Britain was already steamrolling is funny as fuck.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.