How do commies cope with the fact that the Soviets were the Nazis' closest allies until Hitler's spergout in 41?>Collective security refused due to everyone knowing that Commies just wanna expand>Soviets chimp out>Ally with Nazis instead>All anti-German propaganda is banned>Encourage all Moscow-aligned Communist parties to take anti-war positions>Blame Britain and France for the war>Take advantage of secret protocols to invade Finland, Baltics, and Eastern Poland>Become the Nazis' most valuable trade partner
>>17996293They pretend and cope with calling it "realpolitik" which is russian for, "I was only pretending to be retarded!"
comrade the soviets only allied with the n*zoids because the n*zi simp west*ids refused to invade germany in 1936 comrade
>>17996293Both chuds and leftypoltards conveniently ignore this, or pretend it was 200 iq 7d chess which somehow weakened the other side
>>17996293>what is the Munich pact
They act retarded and bring up non-aggression pacts made by the Nazis and Western states as if the only issue with Nazi-Soviet collaboration before 1941 is that they had a non-aggression pact.
It’s hilarious to read about the American left in this era, as they went from raging against fascism in the 30s to suddenly advocating for “peace” and non-intervention, denouncing Lend Lease and evil warmonger FDR alongside Lindbergh and other America First righties, not knowing what kind of stance to take after Hitler invaded Russia, then back on the war wagon after Dec. 7.
Most commies ignore the pre-1941 Soviet-Nazi cooperation, focusing on heroism during the Great Patriotic War.
The same way people cope with the fact that the USA and USSR were fighting on the same side, or that epic anti-Nazi USA stayed out of the fight until they were personally struck, or that the rulers of the belligerent nations of WW1 were cousins.Most people do not look at history as a series of football matches, and have a high enough IQ to not be mindbroken by the general clumsiness and humanity of political and military history.
