Kind of crazy how for decades Mussolini was the commiest commie ever and then suddenly he found his faith in God and the nation just as the prospect of being able to seize power made itself apparent.
>>17996320Socialism fries the brain
>>17996320Mussolini didn't give a shit about god and was still arguably a (now non-Marxist) socialist until his death
>>17996320Musso was an atheist until the end, only mildly tolerating the Catholic Church since he was the biggest compromiser of all time.
>>17996351ThisReminder that, when he got captured by partisans, he got taunted for betraying international socialism and letting Matteotti being killed. That was his crime to the people who killed him: it was not making a dictatorship, or joining forces with Hitler, or losing the war. Same thing happened to Bombacci, who once led Socialists in an election they won and considered himself both a fascist and s communist to the very end
>>17996320>arab rapechild decries raceI wonder if he would still consider race to be a "feeling" looking at modern Rome's rape statistics.
>>17996320Mussolini was a criminal, a wrongdoer, so it makes perfect sense that he was first a commie and then a fascist
>>17996375Nope, he converted in the last part of his life
>>17996491Every single aspect of Hitler's fuckery was also Jewish in roots. Stormfags ignore that Jews sponsored World Wars when it suits them.
>>17996320>Mussolini race quoteSo... The way "race" was used in 1930's Ultra-Nationalist politics is decidedly not the same as today. Today we think of "Whites", "East Asians", "Mexicans" etc. as all being these sufficiently distinct "races" so to speak, with different identities, histories, average behavior, and thus also grievances. When the 1930's Nationalists speak of "race" it's perhaps more fitting to say "ethnicity" or "ethnic identity" than race in the modern tongue..Read this article in its entirety in order to fully understand how the word race was used in 1930's politics, and to better understand the Nazis of the 1930's:https://ubersoy.com/p/what-did-hitler-think-of-slavs-So the idea here is that the Germanic, Anglo and perhaps Nordic people as well were way better than those filthy Russian peasants, because they are largely enjoying a technological advantage at this time and have a slightly different appearance on average. Nationalists also hold that language and culture differences are created by "racial differences", not the other way around, and the Russian tongue was probably not very appealing to many intolerant Germans.
>>17996320>mentally ill freak ping pongs around to different ends of extremismIt happens more often than you'd think.
>>17996531>When the 1930's Nationalists speak of "race" it's perhaps more fitting to say "ethnicity" or "ethnic identity" than race in the modern tongue.They used them interchangeably. Also still used the whole "we are the special ones" rhetoric but tuned a bit here and there
