>Hyper statist control>Deeply authoritarian >Used violence for political control>Single party monopoly>State ownership of production>State commanded economy>Syndicates under state supervision>Strong hiarchy of party elites vs masses>Individuals subsumed under the state>Property and market subordinate to the state>Militaristic>Nationslistic>Imperialistic over Eastern Europe>Political religion & culture of personality & foundationI need someone to explain to me how Stalins USSR in practice was not what fascism is in theory.I would argue that Stalins USSR in practice was closer to the doctrines of fascism than it was to the doctrines of communism.
>>17999815Stalin was everything fascism dreamed to be but failed to become. A white ethnostate that China feared unlike the United States
>>17999818>A white ethnostateExcept ethnostate has nothing to do with fascism
>>17999815They were all totalitarian leftist states, the only difference is Soviet wasn't obsessed with schizo esoteric folkish pagan larp
>>17999818>ethnostate Dumbass. The USSR was as multi-culti as the USA is nowadays, because of its size as much as anything.
>>17999818>A white ethnostateIt was a massive multi-ethnic empire. People project a lot of weird stuff onto the USSR.
>>17999827>obsessed with schizo esoteric folkish pagan larpThis is about fascism, not nazism. I dont know why people can't distinguish the two.Fascism wasn't about volkism. It wasn't about race and it wasn't about antisemitism.Fascism was National-Syndicalism. It's core tenants was an authoritarian state that controlled the market and production and organized labour with repressed individualism as everyone was to be subordinate and subservient to the state.
>>17999848Totalitarian leftist states is the core part, the rest is regional attributes
>>17999815Stalinism was vanguard Marxist Leninism Seethe all you want, Stalin was a great leader
>>18000073So you're not actually going to debate the OP?
>>17999815It wasn't nationalist. The idea was globalism. Once you were inside either state it was mostly the same. But there were major differences at the high level, and at the low level. Socialist economies are run different.
>>17999815It subverted White countries and was officially against White countrieshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9CKXz24pxw
Every fascist country ends up subjugating private industry to the government and every communist country ends up with a big fat dictator. They are both projecting crimes on the other that they themselves commit as well to distract you from the simple fact that they want you to be a slave to them. It's that simple, they are fighting over who gets to be your master while pretending you have to pick one of them.
>>18000073Admiration for Stalin is why nobody will ever embrace Marxism ever again, nor give you and your ilk power. You can't help but show your true colors. You lust for blood and death, you long to crush society beneath a bootheel and can't even be bothered to hide this fact.
>>18000073Don't try to argue here, anon. Many people here really, literally really don't understand a damn thing about sociology, economics, or political science. They don't even reach the level of a damn school kid who just read a social studies textbook.
>>18001174In practice the USSR became another state, but people don't realize how much of that talk was going on. It was all "communism marches on the planet for a world socialist republic" and almost always stressed class differences between people in other countries.
Here's some High Stalinism vibes. (In Czechoslovakia)https://youtu.be/WINBYbWIW5I
>>18001184>they are fighting over who gets to be your master while pretending you have to pick one of themUsually it's because liberalism's passive tolerance of decadence leads into one or the other eventually. Authoritarians promise stability if things ever get too rough. Gen Z is the most absurdly split and polarized generation thus far, similar in a way to 100 years ago
