>if the Americans lost the revolutionary war the leaders would have been hanged, drawn, quartered, and beheaded >Brits lose the war and their leaders just completely get away with it with zero consequences How is that fair?
>>18001527The british were stronger, the americans were never going to threaten british existence in the conflict, might be why they seethe to much at Georgie in the constitution.
Too bad, OP, that generic Instagram slut pic means you never meant this as a serious question. Fuck off.
>>18001545das rite. 'picture unrelated' is a vehicle of trolling and should be a bannable offence.
>>18001527What's George Washington going to do? Sail up the Thames and behead King George?
>>18001527>Brits lose the war and their leaders just completely get away with it with zero consequencesThe loyalists were called Tories(really makes you think) and most of them ran away to Canada after a peace treaty was signed exactly to escape potential persecution.>But muh kang georgeHe was on a different continent, Americans couldn't project their power that far.
I'm sick and tired of these meaningless thirst traps.
As a mexican you made me remember that the independentist leaders like hidalgo or morelos were executed in terrible ways
>>18001527>Rochester NY logo in the backgroundthis nasty bitch is addicted to crack
>>18001527that's a lot of floor space for a studio apartmentalso it's because the US couldn't and really didn't want to attack the bong mainland. outside of that one JPJ raid there wasn't any fighting on the bong mainland.
>>18001527The goal of the US was never to fully break and subjugate Britain, but Britain's goal was to fully break and subjugate the US.
>>18001527No consequences? What about all the tea that was lost! Britain never recovered.
>>18001527The Brits did not revolt.When the Brits revolted, heads rolled.
>>18001715That would be funny if he did
