[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1758044508.jpg (860 KB, 2922x2829)
860 KB
860 KB JPG
Nordicists BTFO.
>>
You need mental help. You know this.
>>
>>18001890
Projection.
>>
>>18001890
I'm part scandi, nordicists are niggerfaggots. All white people are great.
>>
File: distance.png (60 KB, 1080x1138)
60 KB
60 KB PNG
>>18001884
You don't understand the tools you are using or what the data means.
For example, the correct way to measure distance to Sub-Saharans is to take an an ancient West African sample where no Eurasian admixture is present, preferably some place like the Congo. Even then, distance is not a measure of admixture. It is possible to be more distant to Sub-Saharans while simultaneously having more Sub-Saharan admixture than some other population.

>How though?
Why would anyone teach a monkey how a PCA or genetics works? Sounds like a waste of time
>>
>>18001913
Didn't you realize who this thread was made by?
>>
File: 1757976107607.png (176 KB, 360x360)
176 KB
176 KB PNG
>>18001913
Cope. Vahadou's Multi Source-Target Admixture JS does not detect real ancestry, but rather forces a mathematical model based only on the similarity of the genetic vectors provided, that is, the result depends 100% on the sources you choose and the order/position in which you insert them. If you input any source models, it will always model the highest one as the one with the highest DNA percentage in the target model, even if genetically, geographically and chronologically this does not make sense. The algorithm is simply trying to minimize the Euclidean distance between the target and the reference sources, not to calculate true ancestry. Furthermore, the position of the groups in the list also influences the model, which has already been noticed by several Vahaduo users, showing that the first groups tend to be favored in the modeling if they are loosely compatible.

This means that you can manipulate the results by just changing the order of the provided ancestors. Therefore, any debate that relies solely on this as proof of genetic makeup is invalid: it may be useful as an exploratory or illustrative tool, but it is not definitive evidence of ancestry, especially when we are talking about populations that we do not yet have hundreds of samples from. Using Vahaduo alone as an argument is like trying to see the color of something in the dark using a red light flashlight, the results are biased by the tool itself.

Nords have haplogroup I, from IJ, which also originates fucking J of Muzzies that supposedly BLACKED Southern Europe. How the hell can they be whiter than Meds, jackass?
>>
File: images (12).jpg (36 KB, 576x429)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>>18001884
Where ever we look dark races outbred the bright races. But not in your case. Yours is special.
>>
>>18001884
>nordicists
Are they in the room with your right now anon?
>>
>>18001884

Geneticfag threads: can't FUCKING FILTER THEM ALL.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.