Possibly the greatest white woman of our time. If people had her level of rigor and multi-perspective thinking, we wouldn't be such political sheep.
Top 7 white woman of the 21st century no doubt. YouTube lectures can be fun
Literally who?
>>18002459>Possibly the greatest white woman of our time.She's pretty good, yeah. >>18002495>Literally who?Sarah Paine: military historian/professor specializing in East-Asia and South-East Asia. She taught and lectured at some American military academy, but a bunch of her lectures/interviews have been circulating on Youtube recently.
Self-promotion threads are bad
Same physiognomy as Victor Davis Hanson
>>18002459She's an American apologist who will burn for her lies.
>>18003344shut the fuck up Tojiyou’re not supposed to be posting anything on company time
>>18003025Why would Sarah Paine feel the need to promote to /his/ troglodytes?
>>18002459Her YT videos popped up on my feed and she has only surface level midwit takes, this for example.https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vSbAJSjDsjo>it takes blitzkrieg for the british to go "uh oh" and then they're willing to team up with the russiansDid she forget the molotov ribbentrop pact? Why is she mentioning the holocaust when no one was really aware what was happening until after the war was over? The British were aware Germany was "lethal" when they invaded Poland. The Soviets assisted Germany in this invasion until they were in turn invaded. Then and only then did the British side with the Soviets.
>>18003381>watches a short and thinks that's the entire videoActually watch the long form video. Though to be fair the jeet who posts and interviews her is annoying>why is she mentioning the holocaust when no one was really aware what was happeningNo one as in the thousands SS men in charge of those camps? And even if the general populace is unaware the money to round up and kill jews (or send them to luxurious olympic sized pools) will still have significant impacts outside the camps
>>18003498In what context could that sentence be correct?>it takes blitzkrieg for the british to go "uh oh" and then they're willing to team up with the russiansIt makes no causal sense.1939: British realize nazis bad1939: Soviets side with Nazi Germany and participate in the invasion of Poland1941: British side with Soviets after Soviets get invaded1945: the scale of the holocaust becomes apparent to the BritishThe point the British went "uh oh" was in 1939, at this point literally nothing she describes is happening.>No one as in the thousands SS men in charge of those camps?no, even the SS guards didn't know what was happening or the jews in the gas chambers as they pulled the gas release lever, that is clearly what I meant by "no one", I mean "no one" in complete literal absolute autistic terms
>>18003546The British likely didn't want to ally with the Russians until they realized that they would be singlehandedly fighting the war by themselves. 1939 is when Britian realized the Nazis were enemies, and the Blitzkrieg is when they realized they were the number one enemy. That what it sounds like to me but once again I'd have to actually watch the entire video to know what she's talking about.>no, even the SS guards didn't know what was happening or the jews in the gas chambers as they pulled the gas release lever, that is clearly what I meant by "no one", I mean "no one" in complete literal absolute autistic termsThis is just blatantly wrong. The guys running the camps had no clue what the fuck they were doing? Sounds like a load of shit
All these normie academics are being pushed by the algoThis must be a way to fight alternative or extremist ideasEven the chinese professor going viral, if you actually listen to what he says, he sounds like a jewish apologist with a strong modern liberal and progressive bias
>>18003649How is an academic normie? Maybe you're just a troglodyte
>I LOVE FDR SO MUCH HE WAS SO RIGHT FOR SELLING US OUT TO STALIN FOR LITERALLY ZERO GAINSuddenly I don't care about any of her other views
